Skip to main content

New Markers of Vascular Risk

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover The Kidney in Heart Failure

Abstract

Although statins and LDL-C reduction reduce CV events, there remains a significant residual risk for events in both primary and secondary prevention populations, especially in patients with metabolic syndrome, diabetes, or renal impairment. The advent of novel biomarkers, advanced lipid testing, and platelet reactivity has the potential to identify and treat these high-risk patients. The integration of biomarkers for the early detection and the extent of myocardial necrosis, genomic testing, and platelet function assessment to measure improper response to antiplatelet therapy and inflammatory markers with advanced lipid testing to identify inadequate antiatherosclerotic treatment may hopefully markedly reduce the cardiovascular morbidity associated with ACS.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Report of the National Cholesterol Education Program Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults. Arch Intern Med. 1988;148:36–69.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults: Third report of the national cholesterol education program (NCEP) expert panel on detection, evaluation, and treatment of high blood cholesterol in adults (adult treatment panel III) final report. Circulation. 2002;106:3143–421.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Robinson JG, Wang S, Smith BJ, Jacobson TA. Meta-analysis of the relationship between non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol reduction and coronary heart disease risk. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009;53:316–22.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Davidson MH, Maki KC, Pearson TA, et al. Results of the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) evaluation project utilizing novel E-technology (NEPTUNE) II survey and implications for treatment under the recent NCEP Writing Group recommendations. Am J Cardiol. 2005;96:556–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Drexel H, Aczel S, Marte T, Vonbank A, Saely CH. Factors predicting cardiovascular events in statin-treated diabetic and non-diabetic patients with coronary atherosclerosis. Atherosclerosis. 2010;208:484–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Fioretto P, Dodson PM, Ziegler D, Rosenson RS. Residual microvascular risk in diabetes: unmet needs and future directions. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2010;6:19–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Blake GJ, Ridker PM, Kuntz KM. Potential cost-effectiveness of C-reactive protein screening followed by targeted statin therapy for the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease among patients without overt hyperlipidemia. Am J Med. 2003;114:485–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Biasucci LM, Liuzzo G, Grillo RL, et al. Elevated levels of C-reactive protein at discharge in patients with unstable angina predict recurrent instability. Circulation. 1999;99:855–60.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Sachdeva A, Cannon CP, Deedwania PC, et al. Lipid levels in patients hospitalized with coronary artery disease: an analysis of 136,905 hospitalizations in Get With The Guidelines. Am Heart J. 2009;157:111–7.e2.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Daubert MA, Jeremias A. The utility of troponin measurement to detect myocardial infarction: review of the current findings. Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2010;6:691–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Dokainish H, Pillai M, Murphy SA, et al; TACTICS-TIMI-18 Investigators. Prognostic implications of elevated troponin in patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome but no critical epicardial coronary disease: a TACTICS-TIMI-18 substudy. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005;45:19–24. Erratum in: J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005;45:1911

    Google Scholar 

  12. Palacol Roppolo L, Fitzgerald R, Dillow J, et al. A comparison of troponin T and troponin I as predictors of cardiac events in patients undergoing chronic dialysis at a Veteran’s Hospital: a pilot study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1999;34:448–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Gurbel PA, Tantry US, Shuldiner AR, Kereiakes DJ. Genotyping: one piece of the puzzle to personalize antiplatelet therapy. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010;56:112–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Damani SB, Topol EJ. The case for routine genotyping in dual-antiplatelet therapy. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010;56:109–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Grubel PA, Tantry US. An initial experiment with personalized antiplatelet therapy: the GRAVITAS trial. JAMA. 2011;305:1136–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. de Lemos JA, Morrow DA, Bentley JH, et al. The prognostic value of B-type natriuretic peptide in patients with acute coronary syndromes. N Engl J Med. 2001;345:1014–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Manenti ER, Bodanese LC, Camey SA, Polanczyk CA. Prognostic value of serum biomarkers in association with TIMI risk score for acute coronary syndromes. Clin Cardiol. 2006;29:405–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Ray KK, Cannon CP, Cairns R, et al, for the PROVE IT-TIMI 22 Investigators. Relationship between uncontrolled risk factors and c-reactive protein levels in patients receiving standard or intensive statin therapy for acute coronary syndromes in the PROVE IT-TIMI 22 trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005;46:1417–24.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Ray KK, Cannon CP, Cairns R, et al. Prognostic utility of ApoB/AI, total cholesterol/HDL, non-HDL cholesterol, or hs-CRP as predictors of clinical risk in patients receiving statin therapy after acute coronary syndromes: results from PROVE IT–TIMI 22. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2009;29:424–30.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Braun LT, Davidson MH. Lp-PLA2: a new target for statin therapy. Curr Atheroscler Rep. 2010;12:29–33.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Zalewski A, Nelson JJ, Hegg L, Macphee C. Lp-PLA2: a new kid on the block. Clin Chem. 2006;52:1645–50.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Mudd JO, Borlaug BA, Johnston PV, et al. Beyond low-density lipoprotein cholesterol: defining the role of low-density lipoprotein heterogeneity in coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007;50:1735–41.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael H. Davidson .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Davidson, D., Davidson, M.H. (2012). New Markers of Vascular Risk. In: Bakris, G. (eds) The Kidney in Heart Failure. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3694-2_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3694-2_14

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-3693-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-3694-2

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics