Advertisement

Modeling the Graduate Business School Admissions Process

  • Thomas L. Saaty
  • Luis G. Vargas
Chapter
Part of the International Series in Operations Research & Management Science book series (ISOR, volume 175)

Abstract

Each year thousands of individuals seek admission to graduate schools of business in order to pursue courses leading to a master’s degree such as the MBA. From late autumn through early spring, graduate admissions committees within schools of business expend enormous amounts of effort and resources to select an appropriate mix of entering students [1]. The overall decision-making process is usually complex and time consuming. Quantitative and qualitative selection criteria must be agreed upon. Thousands of pieces of application materials must be collected and evaluated. Prospective candidates must be interviewed and their performance judged. Final selections must be made [7]. The entire process must be thorough, fair, and carefully executed.

Keywords

Analytic Hierarchy Process Grade Point Average Admission Process Application Information Analytic Hierarchy Process Model 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Bibliography

  1. 1.
    Dickason DG (1987) Identification, recruitment and admissions of graduate students. In: Council of graduate schools, proceedings of the 27th annual meeting, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Forman EH, Saaty TL (1983) Expert choice manual. Decision Support Software Inc, McLeanGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Messick SJ (1985) Ethical issues in selection. Selections Autumn, pp 27–29Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Saaty TL (1982) Decision making for leaders, RWS Publications, 4922 Ellsworth Ave., Pittsburgh, 1986; Original version published by Lifetime Learning Publications, BelmontGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Saaty TL (1980) Decision making, the analytic hierarchy process, RWS Publications, 4922 Ellsworth Ave., Pittsburgh, 1988; Original version published by McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Saaty TL, France JW, Valentine KR (1991) Modeling the graduate business school admissions process. Socio-Econ Planning Sci 25(2):155–162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Swanberg C, William M, Kevin D (1991) KGSB Admissions Decision Advisor, Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of Course Requirements BA AIM 211Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Turcotte RB (1983) Enrollment management at the graduate level. J College Admissions, pp 24–28 AprilGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Katz Graduate School of Business and College of Business AdministrationUniversity of PittsburghPittsburghUSA

Personalised recommendations