Customized Opinion Mining using Intelligent Algorithms

  • Pablo Cababie
  • Alvaro Zweig
  • Gabriel Barrera
  • Daniela Lopéz De Luise
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering book series (LNEE, volume 151)


Since the INTERNET outburst, consumer perception turned into a complex issue to be measured. Non-traditional advertising methods and new product exhibition alternatives emerged. Forums and review sites allow end users to suggest, recommend or rate products according to their experiences. This gave raise to the study of such data collections. After analyze, store and process them properly, they are used to make reports used to assist in middle to high staff decision making. This research aims to implement concepts and approaches of artificial intelligence to this area. The framework proposed here (named GDARIM), is able to be parameterized and handled to other similar problems in different fields. To do that it first performs deep problem analysis to determine the specific domain variables and attributes. Then, it implements specific functionality for the current data collection and available storage. Next, data is analyzed and processed, using Genetic Algorithms to retro feed the keywords initially loaded. Finally, properly reports of the results are displayed to stakeholders.


Opinion mining Crawling Genetic algorithms 


  1. 1.
    Bharat K, Broder A (1998) A technique for measuring the relative size and overlap of the public web search engines. Comput Netw 30:107–117Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kahle B (1997) Preserving the internet. Sci Am 276(3):82–83Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Howe J (2006) The rise of crowdsourcing. Wired Mag 14(6):1–4Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ding X, Liu B, Zhang L (2009) Entity discovery and assignment for opinion mining applications. KDD’09, Paris, June 2009Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Dave D, Lawrence A, Pennock D (2003) Mining the peanut gallery opinion extraction and semantic classification of product reviews. WWW’03, 2003Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ding X, Liu B, Yu P (2008) A holistic lexicon-based approach to opinion mining. WSDM’08, 2008Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hu M, Liu B (2004) Mining and summarizing customer reviews. In: Proceedings of the KDD-2004, Seattle, 2004Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Pang B, Lee L, Vaithyanathan S (2002) Thumbs up sentiment classification using machine learning techniques. In: Proceeding of EMNLP’02, Philadelphia, 2002Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Malesh J, Carolyn P-R (2009) Generalizing dependency features for opinion miningGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bing L (2008) Opinion mining. Invited contribution to encyclopedia of database systemsGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Esuli A, Sebastiani F (2006) Determining term subjectivity and term orientation for opinion mining. EACL’06, 2006Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hatzivassiloglou V, McKeown K (1997) Predicting the semantic orientation of adjectives. In Proceedings of the ACL-EACL’97, 1997Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Jindal N, Liu B (2006) Mining comparative sentences and relations. In: Proceedings of the twenty first national conference on artificial intelligence AAAI’06, Boston, 2006Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kaji N, Kitsuregawa M (2007) Building lexicon for sentiment analysis from massive collection of HTML documents. EMNLP’07Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kanayama H, Nasukawa T (2006) Fully automatic lexicon expansion for domain-oriented sentiment analysis. EMNLP’06Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Jindal N, Liu B (2008) Opinion spam and analysis. Proceedings of first ACM international conference on web search and data mining (WSDM-2008). Stanford University, Stanford, 11–12 Feb 2008Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Mario J, Luis S (2010) The design of optimist and opinion mining system for portuguese politics. J Soc Criminol 1:2 (Spring/Summer 2010)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Lawrence S, Giles CL (1998) Searching the world wide web. Science 280(5360):98–100Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Chakrabarti S (1999) Focused crawling a new approach to topic-specific Web resource discoveryGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Chakrabarti S (2002) Acelerated focused crawling through online relevance feedback. In: WWW 2002, Hawaii, May 2002Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    De Bra PME, Post RJD (1994) Information retrieval in the world wide web: making client-based searching feasibleGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Hersovici M (1998) The shark search algorithm—An application: tailored web site mappingGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Menczer F, Belew RK (2000) Adaptative retrieval agents: internalizing local context and scaling up to the web. Mach learn 39(2/3):203–242Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Bharat K, Henzinger M (1998) Improved algorithms for topic distillation in hyperlinked environment. ACM SIGIR conference, 1998Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Aggarwal CC (2001) Intelligent crawling on the world wide web with arbitrary predicates. In: Proceedings of the 10th international conference on World Wide Web, Hong Kong, May 2001Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Brooks CH (2008) Web crawling as an AI project. In: Proceedings of the AAAI 2008 AI education colloquium. Chicago, July 2008Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Ravi Kumar S, Raghavan P (2000) Stochastic models for the web graph. In: FOCS, Redondo Beach, November 2000Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Machine learning definition,

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Pablo Cababie
    • 1
  • Alvaro Zweig
    • 1
  • Gabriel Barrera
    • 1
  • Daniela Lopéz De Luise
    • 1
  1. 1.Univesidad de PalermoBuenos AiresArgentina

Personalised recommendations