The Role of Equality in Negotiation and Sustainable Peace

Chapter
Part of the Peace Psychology Book Series book series (PPBS)

Abstract

This chapter critically examines the role of equality, as both a procedural and a distributive principle, for sustainable peace. We first examine the extent to which equality is a preferred principle in negotiations, and its contribution to the durability of agreements. The wider role and benefits (or not) of equality in society are then discussed. Research findings demonstrate that equality in negotiations enhances the durability of agreements. As evidence from civil war negotiations suggests, however, societal stability and longer-term sustainable peace depend in part on connecting the results of negotiations with effective peacemaking and peace-building in a broader sense.

Keywords

Income Turkey Expense Posit Defend 

References

  1. Albin, C. (1995). The global security challenge to negotiation: Toward the new agenda. The American Behavioral Scientist, 38, 921–948.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Albin, C. (2001). Justice and fairness in international negotiation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Albin, C. (2005). Explaining conflict transformation: How Jerusalem became negotiable. Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 18(3), 339–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Albin, C. (2009). Peace versus justice – and beyond. In J. Bercovitch, V. Kremenyuk, & I. W. Zartman (Eds.), The Sage handbook of conflict resolution. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  5. Albin, C., & Druckman, D. (2010). The role of justice in negotiation. In D. Kilgour & C. Eden (Eds.), Handbook of group decision and negotiation. Dordrecht/ New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  6. Aristotle II. (1952). Nicomachean ethics book V. In M. R Hutchins (Ed.), Great books of the Western world. Chicago: Encyclopedia Britannica.Google Scholar
  7. Axelrod, R. (1984). The evolution of cooperation. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  8. Balinski, M. L., & Young, H. P. (2001). Fair representation. Washington, DC: Brookings.Google Scholar
  9. Barry, B. (1995). Justice as impartiality. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
  10. Bartos, O. J. (1974). Process and outcome of negotiations. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Boulding, K. (1975). Ecodynamics: A new theory of societal evolution. Beverly Hills: Sage.Google Scholar
  12. Brown, R., & Adams, D. (1986). The effects of intergroup similarity and goal interdependence on intergroup attitudes and task performance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 22, 78–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Buchanan, R. (2003). Perpetual peace or perpetual process: Global civil society and cosmopolitan legality at the World Trade Organization. Leiden Journal of International Law, 16, 673–699.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Caprioli, M. (2005). Primed for violence: The role of gender inequality in predicting internal conflict. International Studies Quarterly, 49, 161–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Carnevale, P. J., & Leung, K. (2002). Cultural dimensions of negotiation. In M. A. Hogg & R. S. Tindale (Eds.), Group processes: Vol. 3. of the Blackwell handbook of social psychology (pp. 482–496). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  16. Collier, P., & Hoeffler, A. (2002). Greed and grievance in civil war (CSAE Working Paper Series, No. 1, WPS/2002-01). Oxford: Centre for the Study of African Economies. http://www.csae.ox.ac.uk/workingpapers/pdfs/2002-01text.pdf
  17. Cross, J. G. (1977). Negotiation as a learning process. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 21, 581–606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Curle, A. (1971). Making peace. London: Tavistock Publications.Google Scholar
  19. Deutsch, M. (1985). Distributive justice: A social psychological perspective. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Druckman, D. (1968). Ethnocentrism in the inter-nation simulation. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 12, 45–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Druckman, D., & Albin, C. (2011). Distributive justice and the durability of peace agreements. Review of International Studies, 37, 1137–1168.Google Scholar
  22. Druckman, D., & Bonoma, T. V. (1976). Determinants of bargaining behavior in a bilateral monopoly situation II: Opponent’s concession-rate and attraction. Behavioral Science, 21, 252–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Druckman, D., & Harris, R. (1990). Alternative models of responsiveness in international negotiation. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 34, 234–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Elster, J. (1994). The psychology of Tocqueville’s Democracy in America. In The great ideas today (pp. 84–126). Chicago: Encyclopedia Britannica.Google Scholar
  25. European Commission, Directorate-General for Employment, Social Affairs and Equal Opportunities. (2006). Report on the equality between men and women. February.Google Scholar
  26. Gauthier, D. (1986). Morals by agreement. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Gibbard, A. (1990). Wise choices, apt feelings. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Gouldner, A. W. (1960). The norm of reciprocity: A preliminary statement. American Sociological Review, 25, 161–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Heyzer, N. (2005). Women, war and peace: Mobilizing for security and justice in the 21st century. In F. Dodds & T. Pippard (Eds.), Human and environmental security: An agenda for change. London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
  30. Hopmann, P. T. (1995). Two paradigms of negotiation bargaining and problem-solving. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 542, 24–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Iklé, F. C. (1964). How nations negotiate. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  32. Jensen, L. (1988). Bargaining for national security: The post-war disarmament negotiations. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press.Google Scholar
  33. Larson, D. W. (1998). Exchange and reciprocity in international negotiation. International Negotiation, 3, 121–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Lederach, J. P. (1995). Preparing for peace: Conflict transformation across cultures. Syracuse: Syracuse University Press.Google Scholar
  35. LeVine, R. A., & Campbell, D. T. (1972). Ethnocentrism: Theories of conflict, ethnic attitudes, and group behavior. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  36. Locke, J. (1988). Two treatises of government (P. Laslett, Ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Lutzker, D. (1960). Internationalism as a predictor of cooperative behavior. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 4, 426–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Makdisi, S., & Marktanner, M. (2009). Trapped by consociationalism: The case of Lebanon. In Topics in Middle Eastern Economies and North Africa, 11. http://www.luc.edu/orgs/meea/volume11/PDFS/Paper-by-Makdisi%26Marktanner.pdf
  39. McClintock, C. G., & Nuttin, J. M., Jr. (1969). Development of competitive game behavior in children across two cultures. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 5, 203–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. McClintock, C. G., Harrison, A., Strand, S., & Gallo, P. S. (1963). Internationalism, isolationism, strategy of the other player and two-person game behavior. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 67, 631–636.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Melander, E. (2005). Gender equality and intrastate armed conflict. International Studies Quarterly, 49, 695–714.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Montada, L., & Kals, E. (2000). Political implications of psychological research on ecological justice and pro-environmental behavior. International Journal of Psychology, 35, 168–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Nakaya, S. (2003). Women and gender equality in peace processes: From women at the negotiating table to postwar structural reforms in Guatemala and Somalia. Global Governance, 9, 459–476.Google Scholar
  44. Neale, M. A., & Bazerman, M. H. (1985). The effects of framing and negotiator overconfidence on bargaining behaviors and outcomes. The Academy of Management Journal, 28, 34–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Paris, R. (2004). At war’s end: Building peace after civil conflict. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Piaget, J. (1948). The moral judgment of the child. Glencoe: Free Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Rawls, J. (1958). Justice as fairness. Philosophical Review, 67, 164–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Rawls, J. (1971). A theory of justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  49. Rawls, J. (1996). Political liberalism. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  50. Rothchild, D., & Roeder, P. (2005). Power sharing as an impediment to peace and democracy. In P. Roeder & D. Rothchild (Eds.), Sustainable peace: Power and democracy after civil wars. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  51. Rousseau, J.-J. (1983). On the social contract. Discourse on the origin of inequality. Discourse on political economy (D. A. Cress, Ed. & Trans.). Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  52. Schelling, T. C. (1960). The strategy of conflict. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  53. Schwab, K. (2010). The global competitiveness report (2010–2011). Geneva: World Economic Forum.Google Scholar
  54. Sen, A. (1973). On economic inequality. New York: Norton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Singer, J. E., Radloff, L. S., & Work, D. M. (1963). Renegades, heretics, and changes in sentiment. Sociometry, 26, 178–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Solomon, D., & Druckman, D. (1972). Age, representatives’ prior performance, and the distribution of winnings with teammates. Human Development, 15, 244–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Spiro, M. (1965). Children of the Kibbutz. New York: Schocken Books.Google Scholar
  58. Stoll, R. J., & McAndrew, W. (1986). Negotiating strategic arms control, 1969–1979. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 30, 315–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Tajfel, H. (Ed.). (1982). Social identity and intergroup relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  60. Terhune, K. W. (1968). Motives, situation, and interpersonal conflict within the prisoner’s dilemma. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 8, 2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Tesser, A., & Campbell, J. (1980). Self-definition: The impact of the relative performance and similarity of others. Social Psychology Quarterly, 43, 341–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Tessler, M., & Warriner, I. (1997). Gender, feminism, and attitudes toward international conflict. World Politics, 49, 250–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. The Economist. (2009, December 30). Women in the workforce – Female power. The Economist. http://www.economist.com/node/15174418/print
  64. Turner, J. C. (1987). Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
  65. Walton, R. E., & McKersie, R. B. (1965). A behavioral theory of labor negotiations: An analysis of a social interaction system. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  66. World Factbook. (2010). Country comparison: Distribution of family income – Gini index. Washington, DC: Central Intelligence Agency. https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/rankorder/2172rank.html
  67. Zartman, I. W., & Kremenyuk, V. A. (Eds.). (2005). Peace vs. justice: Negotiating backward- and forward-looking outcomes. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Peace and Conflict ResearchUppsala UniversityUppsalaSweden
  2. 2.Department of Public and International AffairsGeorge Mason UniversityFairfaxUSA

Personalised recommendations