Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Patterns of Game Playing Behavior as Indicators of Mastery

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Assessment in Game-Based Learning

Abstract

Every game is a serious one, i.e., every game is appropriate for some learning. How it works and what is learned depends on the context of game playing. Assuming suitable formalizations, there are patterns of game playing behavior. In digital games that are difficult to play, certain occurrences of instances of patterns are indicators of the human player’s mastery or, vice versa, failure. Logically represented pattern concepts set the stage for formal reasoning about characteristics of human game playing experiences and even for automatically learning patterns from instances.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abt, C. C. (1970). Serious games. New York: Viking.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, C. (1979). The timeless way of building. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Angluin, D. (1980). Finding patterns common to a set of strings. Journal of Computer and System Sciences, 21(1), 46–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bauer, F. L., Möller, B., Partsch, H., & Pepper, P. (1989). Formal program construction by transformations-computer-aided, intuition-guided programming. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 15(2), 165–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Björk, S., & Holopainen, J. (2005). Patterns in game design. Hingham: Charles River Media.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borchers, J. (2001). A pattern approach of interaction design. Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brehme, M. (2010). Gray Matter. PC Games, 12/2010, 112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Costikyan, G. (2005). I have no words & I must design. In K. Salen & E. Zimmerman (Eds.), The game design reader: A rules of play anthology (pp. 192–211). Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drachen, A., Nacke, L. E., Yannakakis, G., & Pedersen, A. L. (2010). Correlation between heart rate, electrodermal activity and player experience in first-person shooter games. In S. N. Spencer (Ed.), Proc. of the 5th ACM SIGGRAPH Symposium on Video Games, Los Angeles, USA (pp. 49–54). New York: ACM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Egenfeldt-Nielsen, S. (2007). Educational potential of computer games. London: Continuum Intl. Publ. Group Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehrig, H., Mahr, B., Claßen, I., & Orejas, F. (1992). Introduction to algebraic specification. Part 1 & Part 2. The Computing Journal, 35(5), 460–467 & 468–477.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helm, M., & Theis, F. (2009). Serious Games als Instrument der Führungskräfteentwicklung. In A. Hohenstein & K. Wilbers (Eds.), Handbuch E-Learning (pp. 6.10.1–6.10.12). Köln: Deutscher Wirtschaftsdienst.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holopainen, J., Nummenmaa, T., & Kuittinen, J. (2010). Why gamers don’t learn more. An ecological approach to games as learning environments. In P. Lankoski, A. M. Thorhauge, H. Verhagen, & A. Waern (Eds.), Proc. DIGRA Nordic 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopcroft, J. E., & Ullman, J. D. (1979). Introduction to automata theory, languages, and computation. Reading: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawlitschek, A. (2010). Ein digitales Lernspiel für den Geschichtsunterricht: Konzeption und Evaluation. In S. Hambach, A. Martens, D. Tavangarian, & B. Urban (Eds.), Proceedings of the 3rd International eLBa Science Conference, Rostock, Germany, July 2010 (pp. 278–288). Stuttgart: Fraunhofer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jain, S., Osherson, D., Royer, J. S., & Sharma, A. (1999). Systems that learn. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jantke, K. P. (2007). Serious games—eine kritische analyse. In P. Klimsa (Ed.), 11. Workshop Multimedia in Bildung und Unternehmen (pp. 7–14). Ilmenau: Techn. University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jantke, K. P. (2008). Patterns in Digital Game Playing Experience Revisited: Beiträge zum tieferen Verständnis des Begriffs Pattern. Report DB 33, Ilmenau: TUI, IfMK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jantke, K. P. (2009). The pattern experience evaluation program. In A. Ligeza & G. J. Nalepa (Eds.), DERIS 2009, Intl. Workshop on Design, Evaluation and Refinment of Intelligent Systems (pp. 70–75). Kraków: AGH University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jantke, K. P. (2010). The Gorge approach. Digital game control and play for playfully developing technology competence. In J. Cordeiro, B. Shishlov, A. Verbraeck, & M. Helfert (Eds.), 2nd Intl. Conference on Computer Supported Education, CSEDU (pp. 411-414). Valencia: INSTICC, Apr 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jantke, K. P. (2011). Potenziale und Grenzen des spielerischen Lernens. In M. Metz & F. Theis (Eds.), Digitale lernwelt—serious games (pp. 77–84). Bielefeld: W. Bertelsmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jantke, K. P., & Gaudl, S. (2010). Taxonomic contributions to digital games science. In P. Lankoski, A. M. Thorhauge, H. Verhagen, & A. Waern (Eds.), 2nd International Games Innovation Conference (pp. 27–34), Hong Kong, 22–23 Dec 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kivikangas, J. M., Ekman, I., Chanel, G., Järvelä, S., Cowley, B., Salminen, M., et al. (2010). Review on psychophysiological methods in game research. In Proceedings of DIGRA Nordic 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klinge, H. (2011). Gray matter. GameStar, 1(2011), 92–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lampert, C., Schwinge, C., & Tolks, D. (2009). Der gespielte Ernst des Lebens: Bestandsaufnahme und Potenziale von Serious Games (for Health). Medienpädagogik—Zeitschrift für Theorie und Praxis der Medienbildung, Themenheft 15/16: Computerspiele und Videogames in formellen und informellen Bildungskontexten.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lemezma, M. (2003). Mind magic. Extraordinary tricks to mystify, baffle and entertain. London: New Holland Publ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lenerz, C. (2009). Layered Languages of Ludology—Eine Fallstudie. In A. Beyer & G. Kreuzberger (Eds.), Digitale Spiele—Herausforderung und Chance (pp. 35–64). Boitzenburg: Verlag Werner Hülsbusch.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linderoth, J. (2010). Why gamers don’t learn more. An ecological approach to games as learning environments. In P. Lankoski, A. M. Thorhauge, H. Verhagen, & A. Waern (Eds.), Proceedings of DIGRA Nordic 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Löwgren, J., & Stolterman, E. (2007). Thoughtful interaction design: A design perspective on information technology. Boston: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Philips, B. (2006). Talking about games experience—a view from the trenches. Interactions, 13(5), 22–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Popper, K. (1934). Logik der Forschung. Tübingen, Germany.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ritterfeld, U., Cody, M., & Vorderer, P. (2009). Serious games: Mechanisms and effects. New York: Routledge, Taylor and Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sawyer, B., & Smith, P. (2009). Serious games taxonomy. Retrieved April 14, 2012, from http://www.dmill.com.

Download references

Acknowledgements

Particular thanks go to Anja Hawlitschek for her work on the game “1961” and for providing the database of her evaluation and to Christian Woelfert for implementing the touch screen version of the author’s little game “Gorge.” The present work has been partially supported by the Thuringian Ministry for Education, Science and Culture (TMBWK) within the project iCycle under contract PE-004-2-1.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Children’s Media Department, Fraunhofer IDMT, Kindermedienzentrum, Erich-Kästner-Straße 1a, Erfurt, 99094, Germany

    Klaus P. Jantke

Authors
  1. Klaus P. Jantke
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Klaus P. Jantke .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. , Fakultät für Sozialwissenschaften, University of Mannheim, Gebaudeteil B A5,6, Mannheim, 68131, Baden-Württemberg, Germany

    Dirk Ifenthaler

  2. , College of Education, University of Oklahoma, Van Vleet Oval 820, Norman, 73019, Oklahoma, USA

    Deniz Eseryel

  3. Van Fleet Oval 820, Norman, 73019, Oklahoma, USA

    Xun Ge

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Jantke, K.P. (2012). Patterns of Game Playing Behavior as Indicators of Mastery. In: Ifenthaler, D., Eseryel, D., Ge, X. (eds) Assessment in Game-Based Learning. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3546-4_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation