Skip to main content

Solid-State Phase Transformations and Reactions

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Ceramic Materials

Abstract

In Chapters 14 and 15, we discussed grain boundaries (GBs) and phase boundaries (PBs), respectively. Those two chapters described the interfaces and crystal defects. In Chapter 24, we then examined how the movement of GBs can lead to sintering, grain growth, and densification. In the present chapter, we examine how the movement of PBs leads to transformations and reactions. Some examples of reactions involving the movement of a PB are given in Table 25.1: Not all of these are solid-state reactions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

General references

  • Christian JW (2002) The theory of transformations in metals and alloys (Part I + II), 3rd edn (Hardcover). Elsevier, Oxford, 1216 pages written by the expert: not easy reading

    Google Scholar 

  • Journals: Cement Concrete Res, J Mater Sci, Appl Clay Sci, Clays Clay Miner (the Clay Minerals Society)

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmalzried H (1981) Solid state reactions, 2nd edn. Verlag Chemie, Weinheim and (1995) Chemical kinetics of solids. VCH (now Wiley-VCH), Weinheim, Two texts by the master. Very condensed!

    Google Scholar 

Specific references

  • Butman MF, Smirnov AA, Kudin LS, Munir ZA (2000) Determination of the sign of the intrinsic surface charge in alkali halides from ionic sublimation measurements. Surf Sci 458:106, Using an electric field to studying ion vaporization

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke DR, Levi CG (2003) Materials design for the next generation of thermal barrier coatings. Annu Rev Mater Res 33:383, Discusses the background to Figure 25.3

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • He T, Becker KD (1997) Optical in-situ study of a reacting spinel crystal. Solid State Ion 101–103:337, Studying solid-state reactions by weighing the products

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson MT, Schmalzried H, Carter CB (1997) The effect of an applied electric field on a heterogeneous solid-state reaction. Solid State Ion 101–103:1327, More applicable than it might seem

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Odler I (2000) Special inorganic cements. E&FN Spon, London, A very helpful resource

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith DC (1998) Development of glass-ionomer cement systems. Biomaterials 19:467–478

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to C. Barry Carter .

1 People and history

Schmalzried, Hermann (1932–). An exception to the rule. Formerly a postdoctoral student with Carl Wagner, Hermann has been a mentor and inspiration to many of the current generation of researchers in the field of solid-state reactions in ceramic systems and is profusely thanked by the authors.

Wagner, Carl (1901–1977). He was born in Leipzig and died in Göttingen. He wrote the seminal text with Schottky and laid the foundations for understanding corrosion and reactions between oxides.

2 Exercises

  1. 25.1

    Two cubes (400 m long on each side) of NiO and Al2O3 are reacted at 1,600°C. Assuming that the reaction takes place without significant movement of electrons or oxygen and that a reaction layer is produced that is 100 m thick, what are the respective thicknesses of the remaining NiO and Al2O3?

  2. 25.2

    Given the densities of some of the polymorphs of SiO2, should it be possible to convert -cristobalite to some of the other forms by applying pressure? Briefly explain the reasoning behind your answer and indicate to which of the four forms, if any, the transformation might occur.

  3. 25.3

    Calcium carbonate (CaCO3) exists in two polymorphic forms: calcite and aragonite. The standard state enthalpy of calcite is −1,207.37 kJ/mol, and that of aragonite is −1,207.74 kJ/mol. The entropies of aragonite and calcite under the same conditions are 88 J mol−1 K−1 and 91.7 J mol−1 K−1, respectively. What is the stable polymorph at 25°C and 1 atm? Is there a temperature above which the other polymorph would be the equilibrium phase? If so, what is that temperature? If not, why not?

  4. 25.4

    You want to prepare a sample of mullite by reacting alumina and silica powders. If the activation energy is 210 kJ/mol and the reaction is 10% complete at 1,400°C, how long would it take to convert 50% to mullite at 1,400°C and at 1,500°C? How do you determine that 50% has indeed been converted?

  5. 25.5

    You place two perfect crystals of alumina and magnesia in contact with flat (0001) and (111) surfaces in contact. What orientation do you choose to produce the fast reaction when you heat these to 1,400°C for 1 h? You make the assumption that oxygen does not move during this heat treatment, but this cannot be strictly true. Explain.

  6. 25.6

    You react two samples of alumina and magnesia at 1,400°C for 1 h. This time the MgO is a perfect single crystal, but the alumina is 100-nm grain size polycrystalline material. Does the reaction proceed more quickly or more slowly on average?

  7. 25.7

    Explain the geometry of the precipitates in Figure 25.5 and the defects they contain.

  8. 25.8

    Consider Figure 25.13. What can you determine about the activation energies involved and the diffusion processes?

  9. 25.9

    Consider Figure 25.21. How do you explain the experimental observations in the images in view of the phase diagram and other factors you know about these materials?

  10. 25.10

    Consider Figure 25.24. What can you determine about the energies involved in this reaction?

  11. 25.11

    Imagine the particle in Figure 25.7 growing as the sample is internally reduced. Discuss the diffusion of point defects that must occur.

  12. 25.12

    Draw a schematic to show six atomic planes of Fe2O3 and six of NiFe2O4 aligned with (0001) and parallel to (111). Label them as if they were hexagonal close-packed (hcp) and face-centered cubic (fcc) crystals and suggest how the hematite might grow in the spinel by exsolution.

  13. 25.13

    Draw a nucleus of the particle of the type shown in Figure 25.5, and then draw it again as it begins to grow. Thereby, suggest when and how the twins might form.

  14. 25.14

    Consider Figure 25.10. Which surface of the sapphire is reacting the fastest, and why do you think this is so?

  15. 25.15

    Determine equation 25.5 for yourself and suggest reasonable values for each of the variables and “constants” for the case of water penetrating through a layer of slip.

  16. 25.16

    A layer of MgO reacts with a layer of Al2O3 such that only the cations move. By considering Figure 25.12, show that the spinel grows into the sapphire faster than into the periclase.

  17. 25.17

    Consider equation 25.12 and Figure 25.15. What can you deduce about the average diffusion coefficient?

  18. 25.18

    Consider Figure 25.18B. Explain quantitatively why the spinel nucleates where the grain boundary (GB) meets the substrate surface.

  19. 25.19

    Consider Figure 25.20. Are the three straight lines consistent with one another? (Is T the only factor that is different in the three experiments?)

  20. 25.20

    Consider Figure 25.24. What can you deduce about the dissolution of sapphire in silicate glass?

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Carter, C.B., Norton, M.G. (2013). Solid-State Phase Transformations and Reactions. In: Ceramic Materials. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3523-5_25

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics