Discussion II of Part II

Digital Technologies and Transformation in Mathematics Education
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter is a commentary on a collection of chapters that focus on the transformational potential of digital technologies for learning mathematics. I suggest that the theoretical perspectives represented within the collection cohere around theories that predominantly derive from sociocultural theory, with a focus on the mediating role of technologies in human activity. All of the chapters acknowledge the role of the teacher, and the importance of designing activities to exploit the semiotic potential of digital technologies for learning mathematics. However I argue that the chapters do not adequately take into account students’ out-of-school uses of digital technologies which are likely to impact on their in-school use of ‘mathematical’ technologies, and also the societal and institutional factors that structure the use of technologies in schools. I also argue for the importance of scaling-up the design based studies represented in the collection and developing a model of professional development that exploits the potential of networked communities of mathematics teachers in order to initiate large-scale transformation in mathematics classrooms.

Keywords

Alan 

References

  1. Artigue, M., & Cerulli, M. (2008) Connecting theoretical frameworks: the TELMA perspective. In O. Figueras et al. (eds), Proceedings of the Joint Meeting of PME 32 and PME-NA XXX, Vol 2, pp 81–88, Morelia, Michoacan (Mexico)Google Scholar
  2. Assude, T., Buteau, C., & Forgasz, H. (2010). Factors influencing technology-rich mathematics curriculum and practices. In C. Hoyles & J.-B- Lagrange (eds.), Mathematics Education and Technology-Rethinking the Terrain. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  3. Bartolini Bussi, M., & Mariotti, A. (2008). Semiotic mediation in the mathematics classroom: Artefacts and signs after a vygotskian perspective. In L. English (ed.), Handbook of International research in Mathematics Education, Second Edition. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  4. Brousseau, G. (1997). Theory of Didactical Situations in Mathematics. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  5. Brown, A. L. (1992). Design experiments: Theoretical and methodological challenges in creating complex interventions in classroom settings. Journal of Learning Sciences, 2(2), 141–178.Google Scholar
  6. Chevallard, Y. (1992). Concepts fondamentaux de la didactique: perspectives apportées par une approche anthropologiques. Recherches en Didactique des Mathématiques, 12(1), 77–111Google Scholar
  7. Cobb, P., & McClain, K. (2011). The Collective Mediation of a high-stakes accountability program: Communities and networks of practice. In E. Yackel, K. Gravemeijer, & A. Sfard (eds.), A Journey in Mathematics Education Research: Insights from the Work of Paul Cobb. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  8. Davis, B., Dennis, S., & Luce-Kapler, R. (2000). Engaging minds: Learning and teaching in a complex world. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Publishers.Google Scholar
  9. Drjvers, P., Kieran, C., & Mariotti, M. (2010). Integrating technology into mathematics education: theoretical perspectives. In C. Hoyles & J.-B. Lagrange, (eds.), Mathematics Education and technology-rethinking the terrain. New York: SpringerGoogle Scholar
  10. Hoyles, C., & Sutherland, R. (1989). Logo mathematics in the classroom. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  11. Hoyles, C., & Lagrange, J. B., Eds (2010). Mathematics Education and Technology- Rethinking the Terrain. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  12. Kaput, J., Noss, R., & Hoyles, C. (2008). Developing new notations for a learnable mathematics in the computation era. In L. D. English (ed.), Handbook of International Research in Mathematics Education. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  13. Küchemann, D. E. (1981). Algebra. In K. hart (ed), Children’s understanding of mathematics: 11–16. London: Murray.Google Scholar
  14. Moll, L. C., & Greenberg, J. B. (1990). Creating zones of possibilities: Combining social contexts for instruction. In L. C. Moll (Ed.), Vygotsky and Education: Instructional implications and applications of sociohistorical psychology. (pp. 319–348) New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Pring, R. (2010). The need for a wider vision of learning. International Studies. Sociology of Education, 20(1), 83–91.Google Scholar
  16. Rabardel, P. (2001) Instrument mediated activity in Situations. In A. Blandford, J. Vanderdonckt & P. Gray (Eds.), People and Computers XV—Interactions Without Frontiers, (p. 17–30) New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  17. Selwyn, N. (2011). It’s all about standardisation’—exploring the digital (re)configuration of school management and administration, Cambridge Journal of Education, 41(4), 473–488.Google Scholar
  18. Steiner, J. V., & Mahn, H. (1996). Sociocultural approaches to learning and development: A Vygoskian framework. Educational Psychologist, 31(3/4), 191–206.Google Scholar
  19. Strässer, R. (2009). Instruments for learning and teaching mathematics an attempt to theorize about the role of textbooks, computers and other artefacts to teach and learn mathematics.In M. Tzekaki & H. Sakonidis (Eds.), Proceedings of the 33rd Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 1, pp. 67–81). Thessaloniki, Greece: PMEGoogle Scholar
  20. Sutherland, R. (1989). Providing a computer-based framework for algebraic thinking. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 20(3), 317–344.Google Scholar
  21. Sutherland, R. (2007). Teaching for Learning Mathematics. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Sutherland, R., Eagle, S., & Joubert, M. (2012). A vision and strategy for technology enhanced learning: Repot from the STELLAR Network of Excellence, available at http://www.teleurope.eu/pg/file/read/152343/a-vision-and-strategy-for-technology-enhanced-learning-report-from-the-stellar-network-of-excellence
  23. Sutherland, R., Robertson, S., & John, P. (2009). Improving classroom learning with ICT. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  24. Sutherland, R., & Rojano, T. (1993).A spreadsheet approach to solving algebra problems. Journal of Mathematical behavior, 12, 353–383Google Scholar
  25. Triggs, P., & John, P. (2004). From transaction to transformation: ICT, Professional development and the formation of communities of practice. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning Special Issue, 20(6), 426–439.Google Scholar
  26. Vergnaud, G. (1994). Multiplicative conceptual field: What and why? In G. Harel, & J. Confrey (Eds.), The development of multiplicative reasoning in the learning of mathematics (pp. 41–59). Albany: University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  27. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Wertsch, J. (1991). Voices of the mind: A sociocultural approach to mediated action, Harvester: LondonGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Graduate School of EducationUniversity of BristolBristolUnited Kingdom

Personalised recommendations