Skip to main content

The Evaluation of Gas Swing Contracts with Regime Switching

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Topics in Numerical Methods for Finance

Part of the book series: Springer Proceedings in Mathematics & Statistics ((PROMS,volume 19))

Abstract

A typical gas swing contract is an agreement between a supplier and a purchaser for the delivery of variable daily quantities of gas, between specified minimum and maximum daily limits, over a certain period at a specified set of contract prices. The main constraint of such an agreement that makes them difficult to value are that there is a minimum volume of gas (termed take-or-pay or minimum bill) for which the buyer will be charged at the end of the period (or penalty date), regardless of the actual quantity of gas taken. We propose a framework for pricing such swing contracts for an underlying gas forward price curve that follows a regime-switching process in order to better capture the volatility behavior in such markets. With the help of a recombining pentanomial tree, we are able to efficiently evaluate the prices of the swing contracts and find optimal daily decisions in different regimes. We also show how the change of regime will affect the decisions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Chiarella et al. [8] suggest a two-factor regime-switching forward curve model. However, for simplicity and for the purpose of demonstrating the implementation of the pentanomial tree approach we use a one-factor model here. We also argue that a multifactor model is necessary for hedging and risk management purposes a one-factor model is a good approximation for pricing. Also, it is not hard to generalize the approach in the paper to handle two or more factor models but the computational effort will of course increase.

  2. 2.

    This ratio needs to be adjusted accordingly if we have N > 2 regimes, see [14] for more details.

  3. 3.

    The determination of l depends on the different alternative branching processes for the mean reverting processes. For instance, in Fig. 3, from left to right, l is equal to k − 2, k − 1, k, k + 1, and k + 2, respectively.

References

  1. Bardou, O., Bouthemy, S., Pagès, G.: Optimal quantization for the pricing of swing options. Appl. Math. Finance 16(2), 183–217 (2009)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Barrera-Esteve, C., Bergeret, F., Dossal, C., Gobet, E., Meziou, A., Munos, R., Reboul-Salze, D.: Numerical methods for the pricing of swing options: a stochastic control approach. Meth. Comput. Appl. Probab. 8, 517–540 (2006)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Bollen, N.: Valuing options in regime-switching models. J. Derivatives 6, 38–49 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Boogert, A., Jong, C.D.: Gas storage valuation using a monte carlo method. J. Derivatives 15(3), 81–98 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Breslin, J., Clewlow, L., Strickland, C., van der Zee, D.: Swing contracts: take it or leave it? Energy Risk February 2008 64–68 (2008a)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Breslin, J., Clewlow, L., Strickland, C., van der Zee, D.: Swing contracts part 2: risks and hedging. Energy Risk March 2008 56–60 (2008b)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Carmona, R., Ludkovski, M.: Valuation of energy storage: an optimal switching approach. Quant. Finance 10(4), 359–374 (2010)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Chiarella, C., Clewlow, L., Kang, B.: Modelling and estimating the forward price curve in the energy market. Quantitative Finance Research Centre, University of Technology Sydney. Working Paper No. 260 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Clewlow, L., Strickland, C.: Valuing energy options in a one factor model fitted to forward prices. QFRC Research Paper Series 10, University of Technology, Sydney (1999a)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Clewlow, L., Strickland, C.: Energy Derivatives-Pricing and Risk Management, Lacima Group, London (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Clewlow, L., Strickland, C., Kaminski, V.: Valuation of swing contracts in trees. Energy and Power Risk Management, 6(4) 33–34, (2001a)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Clewlow, L., Strickland, C., Kaminski, V.: Risk analysis of swing contracts. Energy and Power Risk Management, 6(5) 32–33, (2001b)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kiesel, R., Gernhard, J., Stoll, S.: Valuation of commodity-based swing options. J. Energy Markets 3(3), 91–112 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Wahab, M., Lee, C.: Pricing swing options with regime switching. Ann. Oper. Res. 185(1), 139–160 (2009)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Carl Chiarella .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this paper

Cite this paper

Chiarella, C., Clewlow, L., Kang, B. (2012). The Evaluation of Gas Swing Contracts with Regime Switching. In: Cummins, M., Murphy, F., Miller, J. (eds) Topics in Numerical Methods for Finance. Springer Proceedings in Mathematics & Statistics, vol 19. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3433-7_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics