Skip to main content

Abstract

This chapter describes a preliminary randomly controlled trial of Family Court Judges’ evaluation of custody evaluations based on the Egregious/Promotive Factors Model vs. evaluation as usual. Although a key measure is the predictive validity of various models, data from this study can at least give preliminary information about the construct validity of the proposed model.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ackerman, M. J., & Ackerman, M. (1997). Custody evaluation practices: A survey of experienced professionals (revisited). Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 28, 137–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bow, J. N., & Quinnell, F. A. (2002). A critical review of child custody evaluation reports. Family Court Review, 40(2), 164–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emery, R. E. (1999). Marriage, divorce, and children's adjustment. California: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gourley, E. V., & Stolberg, A. L. (2000). An empirical investigation of psychologists’ custody evaluation procedures. Journal of Divorce and Remarriage, 33(1/2), 1–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guttman, J., Ben-Archer, C., & Lazar, A. (1999). Withdrawal threshold in interpersonal conflict among adolescents of divorced parents. Educational Psychology: An International Journal of Experimental Educational Psychology, 19(2), 181–190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keilin, W. G., & Bloom, L. J. (1986). Child custody evaluation practices: A survey of experienced professionals. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 17, 338–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rounsaville, B. J., Carroll, K. M., & Onken, L. S. (2001). NIDA’s stage model of behavioral therapies research: Getting started and moving on from Stage I Clinical Psychology: Science & Practice, 8, 133–142.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Tolle, L.W., O’Donohue, W.T. (2012). Methodology. In: Improving the Quality of Child Custody Evaluations. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3405-4_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics