Skip to main content

Family Dynamics and Caregiving for People with Disabilities

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Multiple Dimensions of Caregiving and Disability

Abstract

Caregiving is at the heart of family life. Parents care for children, spouses care for each other, and, when illness or disability occurs, family members care for each other. At least 80 % of primary caregivers for individuals with severe disabilities are family members. Families affected by a disability experience a host of relational opportunities and challenges. In this chapter, we will discuss factors that shape family dynamics in caregiving for individuals with disabilities related to chronic illness, trauma, or congenital conditions and how clinicians, educators, researchers, and policymakers can promote health family dynamics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    In this chapter, we often refer to “illness and disability” together. These terms are not technically interchangeable. Illness does not always lead to disability, and many disabilities are not a result of illness. We have chosen an inclusive stance toward defining our focus of study for several reasons. First, many of the family dynamics we address pertain to circumstances in which one or more individuals in a family experiences a change in physical functioning, irrespective of the source. Second, from a conceptual and political level, we believe there is much to be gained for families when those with caregiving needs unite around common concerns. Finally, much of our clinical experience and previous writing has focused on families and chronic illness and we wished to draw from that knowledge base.

  2. 2.

    This description is of an actual case. Details of the family have been camouflaged to protect their confidentiality.

References

  • Administration on Aging (AOA). (2006). Legislation and budget. http://www.aoa.gov/about/legbudg/current_budg/legbudg_current_budg.asp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, H., Goolishian, H., & Winderman, L. (1986). Problem determined systems: Towards transformation in family systems. Journal of Strategic and Systemic Therapies, 5, 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • ARCH Respite Coalition. (2009). Lifespan respite to receive $2.5 million for this fiscal year. http://chtop.org/ARCH/ARCH-National-Respite-Coalition.html.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arno, P. S. (2006). Economic value of informal caregiving. Paper presented at the Care Coordination and the Caregiving Forum, Dept. of Veterans Affairs, NIH, Bethesda, MD, January 25–27, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arno, P. S., Levine, C., & Memmott, M. M. (1999). The economic value of informal caregiving. Health Affairs, 18, 182–188.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bakan, D. (1969). The duality of human existence. Chicago: Rand McNally.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloch, D. (1983). Family systems medicine: The field and the journal. Family Systems Medicine, 1, 1–3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boss, P. (1999). Ambiguous loss. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carter, B., & McGoldrick, M. (Eds.). (2005). The expanded family life cycle: Individual, family, and social perspectives (3rd ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, J. C. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94, 95–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engel, G. L. (1977). The need for a new medical model: A challenge for biomedicine. Science, 196, 129–136.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Engel, G. L. (1980). The clinical application of the biopsychosocial model. American Journal of Psychiatry, 137, 535–544.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Helgeson, V. (1994). Relation of agency and communion to well-being: Evidence and potential explanations. Psychological Bulletin, 116, 412–428.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • House, J. S., Landis, K. R., & Umberson, D. (1988). Social relationships and health. Science, 241, 540–545.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Library of Congress. (2006a). Lifespan Respite Care Act of 2002 (S 2489 IS). http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/getdoc.cgi?dbname = 107_cong_bills&docid = f:s2489is.txt.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Library of Congress. (2006b). Title XXIX—Lifespan Respite Care, Ronald Reagan Alzheimer’s Breakthrough Act of 2004 (S. 2533). http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/F?c108:20:./temp/~mdbsu0yPm4:e2490.

    Google Scholar 

  • Library of Congress. (2006c). Bill summary and status for the 109th Congress. http://thomas.loc.gov/bss/abt_stat.html.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyons R. F., Sullivan, M. J. L., Ritvo, P. G., & Coyne, J. C. (1995). Relationships in chronic illness and disability. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacFarlane, W. (2002). Multifamily groups in the treatment of severe psychiatric disorders. New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshak, L. E., Seligman, M., & Prezant, F. (1999). Disability and the family life cycle. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDaniel, S. H., & Campbell, T. L. (Eds.). (1999). Genetic testing and families: A special issue. Families, Systems & Health, 17, 1–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDaniel, S. H., & Cole-Kelly, K. (2003). Gender, couples, and illness: A feminist analysis of medical family therapy. In L. Silverstein & T. J. Goodrich (Eds.), Feminist family therapy (pp. 267–280). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • McDaniel, S. H., Hepworth, J., & Doherty, W. (1992). Medical family therapy: A biopsychosocial approach to families with health problems. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDaniel, S. H., Campbell, T. L., Hepworth, J., & Lorenz, A. (2003). Family-oriented primary care (2nd ed.). New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, S., McDaniel, S. H., Rolland, J., & Feetham, S. (2006). Individuals, families & the new genetics: A biopsychosocial perspective. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mittleman, M. S., Ferris, S. H., Shulman, E., Steinberg, G., & Levin, B. (1996). A family intervention to delay nursing home placement of patients with Alzheimer’s disease: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of the American Medical Association, 276, 1725–1731.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Alliance for Caregiving (NAC) and AARP. (2004). Caregiving in the U.S. http://assets.aarp.org/rgcenter/il/us_caregiving.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olkin, R. (2001). What psychotherapists should know about disability. New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patterson, J. M. (2002, October 14). Personal communication.

    Google Scholar 

  • Penn, P. (1983). Coalitions and binding interactions in families with chronic illness. Family Systems Medicine, 1, 16–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Public Law 109–442. (2006, December 21). 120 STAT. 3291. Lifespan Respite Care Act of 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rolland, J. (1994). Illness, families & disabilities. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seaburn, D. B., & Erba, G. (2003). The family experience of “sudden health”: The case of intractable epilepsy. Family Process, 42, 453–468.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Seaburn, D. B., Lorenz, A. D., Gunn, Jr., W. B., Gawinski, B. A., & Mauksch, L. B. (1996). Models of collaboration: A guide for mental health professionals working with health care practitioners. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Census Bureau. (1997, December). Census brief (CENBR/97–5). http://www.census.gov/prod/3/97pubs/cenbr975.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Census Bureau. (2005). Facts for features (CB05-FF.10–2). http://www.census.gov/Press-release/www/releases/archives/facts_for_features_special_editions/004998.html.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Census Bureau. (2006). http://factfinder.census.gov/servlet/STTable?_bm=y&-geo_id=01000US&-qr_name=ACS_2006_EST_G00_S1801&-ds_name=ACS_2006_EST_G00_&-_lang=en&-_caller=geoselect&-redoLog=false&-format=.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walsh, F. (2003). Family resilience: A framework for clinical practice. Family Process, 42, 1–18.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Walsh, F. (2006). Strengthening family resilience. New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weihs, K., Fisher, L., & Baird, M. (2002). Families, health, and behavior—A section of the commissioned report by the Committee on Health and Behavior: Research, Practice, and Policy, Division of Neuroscience and Behavioral Health and Division of Health Promotion and Disease Prevention, Institute of Medicine, National Academy of Sciences. Families, Systems & Health, 20, 7–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wynne, L. C. (2003). Systems theory and the biopsychosocial model. In R. Frankel, T. Quill, & S. H. McDaniel (Eds.), The biopsychosocial approach: Past, present, and future (pp. 219–230). Rochester: University of Rochester Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Susan H. McDaniel or Anthony R. Pisani .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

McDaniel, S., Pisani, A. (2012). Family Dynamics and Caregiving for People with Disabilities. In: Talley, R., Crews, J. (eds) Multiple Dimensions of Caregiving and Disability. Caregiving: Research • Practice • Policy. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3384-2_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics