Skip to main content

Molluscs and Echinoderms

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Environmental Archaeology

Part of the book series: Manuals in Archaeological Method, Theory and Technique ((MATT))

  • 3349 Accesses

Abstract

Three invertebrate groups (Crustacea, Mollusca, Echinodermata) are of particular importance in multiproxy studies because many were widely used by people, often are abundant, or at least highly visible, in archaeological deposits, and are sensitive to environmental conditions. Crustacea are discussed in Chap. 10 with other arthropods. In this chapter, Mollusca and Echinodermata are reviewed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Andrus, C. F. T. (2011). Shell midden sclerochronology. Quaternary Science Reviews, 30, 2892–2905.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andrus, C. F. T., & Crowe, D. E. (2000). Geochemical analysis of Crassostrea virginica as a method to determine season of capture. Journal of Archaeological Science, 27, 33–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andrus, C. F. T., & Thompson, V. D. (2012). Determining the habitats of mollusk collection at the Sapelo Island Shell Ring Complex, Georgia, USA using oxygen isotope sclerochronology. Journal of Archaeological Science, 29, 215–228.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brusca, R. C., & Brusca, G. J. (2003). Invertebrates (2nd ed.). Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, G. (2008a). A preliminary study of methods for identifying archaeological sea urchin remains in the Pacific Northwest. Canadian Zooarchaeology, 25, 15–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, G. (2008b). Sorry, wrong phylum, a neophyte archaeomalacologist’s experiences in analyzing a European Atlantic sea urchin assemblage. Archaeofauna, 17, 77–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, N. A., Reece, J. B., Urry, L. A., Cain, S. A., Wasserman, S. A., Minorsky, P. V., et al. (2008). Biology (8th ed.). San Francisco, CA: Pearson Benjamin Cummings.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cannon, A., & Burchell, M. (2009). Clam growth-stage profiles as a measure of harvest intensity and resource management on the central coast of British Columbia. Journal of Archaeological Science, 36, 1050–1060.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carré, M., Klaric, L., Lavallée, D., Julien, M., Bentaleb, I., Fontugne, M., et al. (2009). Insights into early Holocene hunter-gatherer mobility on the Peruvian southern coast from mollusk gathering seasonality. Journal of Archaeological Science, 36, 1173–1178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carter, S. P. (1990). The stratification and taphonomy of shells in calcareous soils: Implications for land snail analysis in archaeology. Journal of Archaeological Science, 17, 495–507.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Claassen, C. (1998). Shells. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Culleton, B. J., Kennett, D. J., & Jones, T. L. (2009). Oxygen isotope seasonality in a temperate estuarine shell midden: A case study from CA-ALA-17 on the San Francisco Bay, California. Journal of Archaeological Science, 36, 1354–1363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davies, P. (2003). The interpretation of Mollusca from Holocene overbank alluvial deposits: Progress and future directions. In A. J. Howard, M. Macklin, & D. G. Passmore (Eds.), Alluvial archaeology in Europe (pp. 291–302). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: A. A. Balkema.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, P. (2008). Snails: Archaeology and landscape change. Oxford, UK: Oxbow Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deith, M. R. (1983). Molluscan calendars: The use of growth-line analysis to establish seasonality of shellfish collection at the Mesolithic site of Morton, Fife. Journal of Archaeological Science, 10, 423–440.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deshpande-Mukherjee, A. (2005). Marine shell utilisation by the Chalcolithic societies of the western Deccan region of India. In D. E. Bar-Yosef (Ed.), Archaeomalacology: Molluscs in former environments of human behavior (pp. 174–184). Oxford, UK: Oxbow Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eggers, S., Petronilho, C. C., Brandt, K., Jericó-Daminello, C., Filippini, J., & Reinhard, K. J. (2008). How does a riverine setting affect the lifestyle of shellmound builders in Brazil? HOMO-Journal of Comparative Human Biology, 69, 405–427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans, J. G. (1972). Land snails in archaeology, with special reference to the British Isles. London: Seminar Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giovas, C. M. (2009). The shell game: Analytic problems in archaeological mollusc quantification. Journal of Archaeological Science, 36, 1557–1564.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grayson, D. K. (1984). Quantitative zooarchaeology: Topics in the analysis of archaeological faunas. Orlando, FL: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hallmann, N., Burchell, M., Schöne, B. R., Irvine, G. V., & Maxwell, D. (2009). High-resolution sclerochronological analysis of the bivalve mollusk Saxidomus gigantea from Alaska and British Columbia: Techniques for revealing environmental archives and archaeological seasonality. Journal of Archaeological Science, 36, 2353–2364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henshilwood, C. S., d’Errico, F., van Niekerk, K. L., Coquinot, Y., Jacobs, Z., Lauritzen, S.-E., et al. (2011). A 100,000-year-old ochre-processing workshop at Blombos Cave, South Africa. Science, 334, 219–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hillson, S. (2005). Teeth (2nd ed.). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Holden, T. G. (2001). Dietary evidence from the coprolites and intestinal contents of ancient humans. In D. R. Brothwell & A. M. Pollard (Eds.), Handbook of archaeological sciences (pp. 403–413). Chichester, UK: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jerardino, A., & Navarro, R. (2008). Shell morphology of seven limpet species from coastal shell middens in southern Africa. Journal of Archaeological Science, 35, 1023–1029.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, D. S., Arthur, S. M. A., & Allard, D. J. (1989). Sclerochronological records of temperature and growth from shells of Mercenaria mercenaria from Narragansett Bay, Rhode Island. Marine Biology, 102(2), 225–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krogh, D. (2009). Biology: A guide to the natural world (4th ed.). San Francisco, CA: Pearson, Benjamin Cummings.

    Google Scholar 

  • Losey, R. J., Yamada, S. B., & Largaespada, L. (2004). Late-Holocene Dungeness crab (Cancer magister) harvest at an Oregon coast estuary. Journal of Archaeological Science, 31, 1603–1612.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marriner, N., Morhange, C., & Carayon, N. (2008). Ancient Tyre and its harbours: 5000 years of human-environmental interactions. Journal of Archaeological Science, 35, 1281–1310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, C. (2005). The shell material from Suwayh I (Oman, Neolithic). In D. E. Bar-Yosef (Ed.), Archaeomalacology: Molluscs in former environments of human behavior (pp. 166–173). Oxford, UK: Oxbow Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meehan, B. (1982). Shell bed to shell midden. Canberra: Australian Institute of Aboriginal Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milner, N. (2001). At the cutting edge: Using thin sectioning to determine season of death of the European oyster, Ostra edulis. Journal of Archaeological Science, 28, 861–873.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newsom, L. A., & Wing, E. S. (2004). On land and sea: Native American use of biological resources in the West Indies. Tuscaloosa, AL: University of Alabama Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Okumura, M. M. M., & Eggers, S. (2005). The people of Jabuticabeira II: Reconstruction of the way of life in a Brazilian shellmound. HOMO-Journal of Comparative Human Biology, 55, 263–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orton, C. (2000). Sampling in archaeology. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Osborne, P. J. (1983). An insect fauna from a modern cesspit and its comparison with probable cesspit assemblages from archaeological sites. Journal of Archaeological Science, 10, 453–463.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pearsall, D. M. (2000). Paleoethnobotany: A handbook of procedures (2nd ed.). San Diego, CA: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quitmyer, I. R., Hale, H. S., & Jones, D. S. (1985). Paleoseasonality determination based on incremental shell growth in the hard clam, Mercenaria mercenaria, and its implications for the analysis of three southeast Georgia coastal shell middens. Southeastern Archaeology, 4(1), 27–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quitmyer, I. R., & Jones, D. S. (1992). Calendars of the coast: Coastal seasonal growth increment patterns in shells of modern and archaeological southern quahogs, Mercenaria campechiensis, from Charlotte Harbor, Florida, In: W. H. Marquardt (Ed.), Culture and environment in the domain of the Calusa (pp. 247–264). Institute of Archaeology and Paleoenvironmental Studies Monograph 1. Gainesville, Florida.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quitmyer, I. R., Jones, D. S., & Arnold, W. S. (1997). The sclerochronology of hard clams, Mercenaria spp., from the south-eastern U.S.A.: A method of elucidating the zooarchaeological records of seasonal resource procurement and seasonality in prehistoric shell middens. Journal of Archaeological Science, 24, 825–840.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reitz, E. J., & Wing, E. S. (2008). Zooarchaeology (2nd ed.). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rigaud, S., d’Errico, F., Vanhaeren, M., & Neumann, C. (2009). Critical reassessment of putative Acheulean Porosphaera globularis beads. Journal of Archaeological Science, 36, 25–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodrigues, S. I., Porsini, J. L., Santos, V. R. N., DeBlasis, P. A. D., & Giannini, P. C. F. (2009). GPR and inductive electromagnetic surveys applied in three coastal Sambaqui (shell mounds) archaeological sites in Santa Catarina state, South Brazil. Journal of Archaeological Science, 36, 2081–2089.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosendahl, D., Ulm, S., & Weisler, M. I. (2007). Using foraminifera to distinguish between natural and cultural shell deposits in coastal eastern Australia. Journal of Archaeological Science, 34, 1584–1593.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruscillo, D. (2005). Reconstructing Murex Royal Purple and Biblical Blue in the Aegean. In D. E. Bar-Yosef (Ed.), Archaeomalacology: Molluscs in former environments of human behavior (pp. 99–106). Oxford, UK: Oxbow Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russo, M. (1991). A method for the measurement of season and duration of oyster collection: Two case studies from the prehistoric south-east U.S. coast. Journal of Archaeological Science, 18, 205–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shannon, C. E., & Weaver, W. (1949). The mathematical theory of communication. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheldon, A. L. (1969). Equitability indices: Dependence on the species count. Ecology, 50, 466–467.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turgeon, D. D., Quinn, J. F., Bogan, A. E., Coan, E. V. Hochberg, F. G., Lyons, W. G., et al. (1998). Common and scientific names of aquatic invertebrates from the United States and Canada: Mollusks (2nd ed.). American Fisheries Society Special Publication 26. Bethesda, MD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vermeij, G. J. (1993). A natural history of shells. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiner, S. (2010). Microarchaeology: Beyond the visible archaeological record. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wheeler, A., & Jones, K. G. (1989). Fishes. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitaker, A. R. (2008). Incipient aquaculture in prehistoric California?: Long-term productivity and sustainability vs. immediate returns for the harvest of marine invertebrates. Journal of Archaeological Science, 35, 1114–1123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilkens, B. (2005). The use of marine shells at Sumhuram, Oman. In D. E. Bar-Yosef (Ed.), Archaeomalacology: Molluscs in former environments of human behavior (pp. 159–165). Oxford, UK: Oxbow Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson, K., & Stevens, C. (2003). Environmental archaeology: Approaches, techniques, and applications. Stroud, UK: Tempus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, J. (2006). Clam gardens: Aboriginal mariculture on Canada’s West Coast. Vancouver: New Star Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolverton, S., Randklev, C. R., & Kennedy, J. H. (2010). A conceptual model for freshwater mussel (Family: Unionidae) remain preservation in zooarchaeological assemblages. Journal of Archaeological Science, 37, 164–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Reitz, E.J., Shackley, M. (2012). Molluscs and Echinoderms. In: Environmental Archaeology. Manuals in Archaeological Method, Theory and Technique. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3339-2_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics