Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Varicocele

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Male Infertility

Abstract

This chapter discusses the current concepts and controversies regarding the epidemiology, pathophysiology, diagnosis, treatment, and significance of clinical and subclinical varicoceles in male infertility. It also reviews the management of varicoceles in azoospermic patients and the novel indications of varicocelectomy in the era of assisted reproductive technology (ART). A critical commentary, based on the author’s 15-year experience treating infertile men with varicoceles, and a review of important publications from the last 5 years are included. Varicocele is still one of the most controversial issues in the field of male infertility, especially regarding why, when, and to whom treatment should be applied. Varicocele repair is considered the treatment of choice for varicocele-associated infertility, but its effectiveness has been discussed for several years. Although the ultimate end point for the treatment of male factor infertility is a live birth, efforts to maximize the couple’s fertility potential by improving testicular function should be the main purpose of varicocele treatment. Approximately 8% of men in reproductive age seek for medical assistance for fertility-related problems. Of these, 1–10% carry conditions that compromise the reproductive potential, and varicocele accounts for 35% of the cases. In a group of 2,875 infertile couples attending our tertiary center for male reproduction, a varicocele was identified in 21.9% of the male partners.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Vital and Health Statistics, series 23, no.26, CDC. http://www.cdc.gov. Accessed 10 Dec 2009.

  2. Saypol DC. Varicocele. J Androl. 1981;2:61–71.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Tulloch WS. A consideration of sterility factors in the light of subsequent pregnancies. Edinburgh Med J. 1952;59:29–34.

    Google Scholar 

  4. MacLeod J. Seminal cytology in the presence of varicocele. Fertil Steril. 1965;16:735–57.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Akbay E, Cayan S, Doruk E, et al. The prevalence of varicocele and varicocele-related testicular atrophy in Turkish children and adolescents. BJU Int. 2000;86:490–3.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Callam MJ. Epidemiology of varicose veins. BJU Int. 1994;81:167–73.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Canales BK, Zapzalka DM, Ercole CJ, et al. Prevalence and effect of varicoceles in an elderly population. Urology. 2005;66:627–31.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Raman JD, Walmsley K, Goldstein M. Inheritance of varicoceles. Urology. 2005;65:1186–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Handel LN, Shetty R, Sigman M. The relationship between varicoceles and obesity. J Urol. 2006;176:2138–40.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Luigi L, Gentile V, Pigozzi F, et al. Physical activity as a possible aggravating factor for athletes with varicocele: impact on the semen profile. Hum Reprod. 2001;16:1180–4.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Nistal M, Gonzalez-Peramato P, Serrano A, et al. Physiopathology of the infertile testicle. Etiopathogenesis of varicocele. Arch Esp Urol. 2004;57:883–904.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Goldstein M, Eid JF. Elevation of intratesticular and scrotal skin surface temperature in men with varicocele. J Urol. 1989;142:743–5.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Chehval MJ, Purcell MH. Varicocelectomy: incidence of external vein involvement in the clinical varicocele. Urology. 1992;39:573–5.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Shafik A, Bedeir GAM. Venous tension patterns in cord veins in normal and varicocele individuals. J Urol. 1980;123:383–5.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Tilki D, Kilic E, Tauber R, et al. The complex structure of the smooth muscle layer of spermatic veins and its potential role in the development of varicocele testis. Eur Urol. 2007;51:1402–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Marmar JL. The pathophysiology of varicoceles in the light of current molecular and genetic information. Hum Reprod Update. 2001;7:461–72.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Simsek F, Turkeri L, Cevik I, et al. Role of apoptosis in testicular damage caused by varicocele. Arch Esp Urol. 1998;9:947–50.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Benoff S, Gilbert BR. Varicocele and male infertility: Part I. Preface. Hum Reprod Update. 2001;7:47–54.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Naugton DK, Nangia AK, Agarwal A. Varicocele and male infertility: Part II. Pathophysiology of varicoceles in male infertility. Hum Reprod Update. 2001;7:473–81.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Koksal IT, Ishak Y, Usta M, et al. Varicocele-induced testicular dysfunction may be associated with disruption of blood-testis barrier. Arch Androl. 2007;53:43–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Wang YX, Lei C, Dong SG, et al. Study of bilateral histology and meiotic analysis in men undergoing varicocele ligation. Fertil Steril. 1991;55:152–5.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Agarwal A, Prabakaran S, Allamaneni SS. Relationship between oxidative stress, varicocele and infertility: a meta-analysis. Reprod Biomed Online. 2006;12:630–3.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Kamyar Ghabili K, Shoja MM, Agutter PS, et al. Hypothesis: intracellular acidification contributes to infertility in varicocele. Fertil Steril. 2009;92:399–401.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Naughton CK, Nangia AK, Agarwal A. Pathophysiology of varicoceles in male infertility. Hum Reprod Update. 2001;7:473–81.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. World Health Organization. The influence of varicocele on parameters of fertility in a large group of men presenting to infertility clinics. Fertil Steril. 1992;57:1289–93.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Jarow JP. Effects of varicocele on male fertility. Hum Reprod Update. 2001;7:59–64.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Evers JL, Collins JA. Assessment of efficacy of varicocele repair for male subfertility: a systematic review. Lancet. 2003;361:1849–52.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Νieschlag E, Hertle L, Fischedick A, et al. Update on treatment of varicocele: counseling as effective as occlusion of the vena spermatica. Hum Reprod. 1998;13:2147–50.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Redmon JB, Carey P, Pryor JL. Varicocele-the most common cause of male factor infertility? Hum Reprod Update. 2002;8:53–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Dubin R, Amelar RD. Varicocele size and results of varicocelectomy in selected subfertile men with varicocele. Fertil Steril. 1970;21:606–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Trum JW, Gubler FM, Laan R, van der Veen F. The value of palpation, varicoscreen contact thermography and colour Doppler ultrasound in the diagnosis of varicocele. Hum Reprod. 1996;11:1232–5.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Gat Y, Bachar GN, Zukerman Z, et al. Physical examination may miss the diagnosis of bilateral varicocele: a comparative study of 4 diagnostic modalities. J Urol. 2004;172:1414–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Geatti O, Gasparini D, Shapiro B. A comparison of scintigraphy, thermography, ultrasound and phlebography in grading of clinical varicocele. J Nucl Med. 1991;32:2092–7.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Chiou RK, Anderson JC, Wobig RK, et al. Color Doppler ultrasound criteria to diagnose varicoceles: correlation of a new scoring system with physical examination. Urology. 1997;50:953–6.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Hirsh AV, Cameron KM, Tyler JP, et al. The Doppler assessment of varicoceles and internal spermatic vein reflux in infertile men. Br J Urol. 1980;52:50–6.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Nagler HM, Luntz RK, Martinis FG. Varicocele. In: Lipshultz LI, Howards SS, editors. Infertility in the Male. 3rd ed. Mosby; 1997. pp. 336–359.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Report on varicocele and infertility. Fertil Steril. 2006 Nov;86(5 Suppl 1):S93–5. Review. PubMed PMID: 17055852.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Cavallini G, Ferraretti AP, Gianaroli L, et al. Cinnoxicam and L-carnitine/acetyl-L-carnitine treatment for idiopathic and varicocele-associated oligoasthenospermia. J Androl. 2004;25:761–70.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Unal D, Yeni E, Verit A, Karatas OF. Clomiphene citrate versus varicocelectomy in treatment of subclinical varicocele: a prospective randomized study. Int J Urol. 2001;8:227–30.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Micic S, Tilic C, Dotlic R. Kallikrein therapy of infertile men with varicocele and impaired sperm motility. Andrologia. 1990;22:179–83.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. De Rose AF, Gallo F, Giglio M, et al. Early use of menotropin in the treatment of varicocele. Arch Ital Urol Androl. 2003;75:53–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Oliva A, Dotta A, Multigner L. Pentoxifylline and antioxidants improve sperm quality in male patients with varicocele. Fertil Steril. 2009;91(Suppl):1536–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Paradiso Galatioto G, Gravina GL, Angelozzi G, et al. May antioxidant therapy improve sperm parameters of men with persistent oligospermia after retrograde embolization for varicocele? World J Urol. 2008;26:97–102.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Cayan S, Shavakhabov S, Kadioglu A. Treatment of palpable varicocele review in infertile men: a meta-analysis to define the best technique. J Androl. 2009;30:33–40.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Shlansky-Goldberg RD, Van Arsdalen KN, Rutter CM, et al. Percutaneous varicocele embolization versus surgical ligation for the treatment of infertility: changes in seminal parameters and pregnancy outcomes. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 1997;8:759–67.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Bahren W, Lenz M, Porst H, et al. Side effects, complications and contraindications for percutaneous sclerotherapy of the internal spermatic vein in the treatment of idiopathic varicocele. Rofo. 1983;138:172–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Matthews RD, Roberts J, Walker WA, et al. Migration of intravascular balloon after percutaneous embolotherapy of varicocele. Urology. 1992;39:373–5.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Sharlip ID, Jarow JP, Belker AM, et al. Best practice policies for male infertility. Fertil Steril. 2002;77:873–82.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Sautter T, Sulser T, Suter S, et al. Treatment of varicocele: a prospective randomized comparison of laparoscopy versus antegrade sclerotherapy. Eur Urol. 2002;41:398–400.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Al-Kandari AM, Shabaan H, Ibrahim HM, et al. Comparison of outcomes of different varicocelectomy techniques: open inguinal, laparoscopic, and subinguinal microscopic varicocelectomy: a randomized clinical trial. Urology. 2007;69:417–20.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Hopps CV, Lemer ML, Schlegel PN, et al. Intraoperative varicocele anatomy: a microscopic study of the inguinal versus subinguinal approach. J Urol. 2003;170:2366–70.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Tuccar E, Yaman O, Erdemli E, et al. Histomorphological differences of spermatic cords regarding subinguinal versus inguinal levels: a cadaveric study. Urol Int. 2009;82:444–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Schlesinger MH, Wilets IF, Nagler HM. Treatment outcome after varicocelectomy. A critical analysis. Urol Clin North Am. 1994;21:517–29.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Colpi GM, Carmignani L, Nerva F, et al. Surgical treatment of varicocele by a subinguinal approach combined with antegrade intraoperative sclerotherapy of venous vessels. BJU Int. 2006;97:142–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Steckel J, Dicker AP, Goldstein M. Relationship between varicocele size and response to varicocelectomy. J Urol. 1993;149:769–71.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Matkov TG, Zenni M, Sandlow J, et al. Preoperative semen analysis as a predictor of seminal improvement following varicocelectomy. Fertil Steril. 2001;75:63–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Marks JL, McMahon R, Lipshultz LI. Predictive parameters of successful varicocele repair. J Urol. 1986;136:609–12.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Yoshida K, Kitahara S, Chiba K, et al. Predictive indicators of successful varicocele repair in men with infertility. Int J Fertil. 2000;45:279–84.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. Cayan S, Lee D, Black LD, Reijo Pera RA, Turek PJ. Response to varicocelectomy in oligospermic men with and without defined genetic infertility. Urology. 2001;57:530–5.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. Pryor JL, Kent-First M, Muallem A, et al. Microdeletions in the Y chromosome of infertile men. N Engl J Med. 1997;336:53453–9.

    Google Scholar 

  61. Kondo Y, Ishikawa T, Yamaguchi K, et al. Predictors of improved seminal characteristics by varicocele repair. Andrologia. 2009;41:20–3.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  62. Yamamoto M, Hibi H, Hirata Y, et al. Effect of varicocelectomy on sperm parameters and pregnancy rate in patients with subclinical varicocele: a randomized prospective controlled study. J Urol. 1996;155:1636–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. Zini A, Boman J, Jarvi K, et al. Varicocelectomy for infertile couples with advanced paternal age. Urology. 2008;72:109–13.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Libman J, Jarvi K, Lo K, Zini A. Beneficial effect of microsurgical varicocelectomy is superior for men with bilateral versus unilateral repair. J Urol. 2006;176:2602–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Kantartzi PD, Goulis ChD, Goulis GD, et al. Male infertility and varicocele: myths and reality. Hippokratia. 2007;11:99–104.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  66. Zheng YQ, Gao X, Li ZJ, Yu YL, Zhang ZG, Li W. Efficacy of bilateral and left varicocelectomy in infertile men with left clinical and right subclinical varicoceles: a comparative study. Urology. 2009;73:1236–40.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Elbendary MA, Elbadry AM. Right subclinical varicocele: how to manage in infertile patients with clinical left varicocele? Fertil Steril. 2009;92:2050–3.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Dhabuwala CB, Hamid S, Moghisi KS. Clinical versus subclinical varicocele: improvement in fertility after varicocelectomy. Fertil Steril. 1992;57:854–7.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  69. Amelar RD, Dubin L. Right varicocelectomy in selected infertile patients who have failed to improve after previous left varicocelectomy. Fertil Steril. 1987;47:833–7.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  70. Carpi A, Sabanegh E, Mechanick J. Controversies in the management of nonobstructive azoospermia. Fertil Steril. 2009;91:963–70.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Esteves SC, Glina S. Recovery of spermatogenesis after microsurgical subinguinal varicocele repair in azoospermic men based on testicular histology. Int Braz J Urol. 2005;31:541–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Matthews GJ, Matthews ED, Goldstein M. Induction of spermatogenesis and achievement of pregnancy after microsurgical varicocelectomy in men with azoospermia or severe oligoasthenospermia. Fertil Steril. 1998;70:71–5.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  73. Kim ED, Leibman BB, Grinblat DM, et al. Varicocele repair improves semen parameters in azoospermic men with spermatogenic failure. J Urol. 1999;162:737–40.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  74. Kadioglu A, Tefekli A, Cayan S, et al. Microsurgical inguinal varicocele repair in azoospermic men. Urology. 2001;57:328–33.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  75. Cayan M, Altug U. Induction of spermatogenesis by inguinal varicocele repair in azoospermic men. Arch Androl. 2004;50:145–50.

    Google Scholar 

  76. Poulakis V, Ferakis N, de Vries R, et al. Induction of spermatogenesis in men with azoospermia or severe oligoteratoasthenospermia after antegrade internal spermatic vein sclerotherapy for the treatment of varicocele. Asian J Androl. 2006;8:613–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. Ishikawa T, Kondo Y, Yamaguchi K, et al. Effect of varicocelectomy on patients with unobstructive azoospermia and severe oligospermia. Br J Urol Int. 2007;101:216–8.

    Google Scholar 

  78. Lee JS, Park HJ, Seo JT. What is the indication for varicocelectomy in men with nonobstructive azoospermia? Urology. 2007;69:352–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. Weedin JW, Khera M, Lipshultz LI. Varicocele Repair in Patients with Nonobstructive Azoospermia – A Meta-Analysis. J Urol. 2010 Jun;183(6):2309–15.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  80. Esteves SC. Editorial comment. J Urol. 2010 Jun;183(63):2315.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  81. Esteves SC, Verza Jr S, Gomes AP. Successful retrieval of testicular spermatozoa by microdissection (micro-TESE) in nonobstructive azoospermia is related to testicular histology. Fertil Steril. 2006;86(Suppl):354.

    Google Scholar 

  82. Verza Jr S, Esteves SC. Sperm defect severity rather than sperm source is associated with lower fertilization rates after intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Int Braz J Urol. 2008;34:49–56.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  83. Schlegel PN, Kaufmann J. Role of varicocelectomy in men with nonobstructive azoospermia. Fertil Steril. 2004;81:1585–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  84. Inci K, Hascicek M, Kara O, et al. Sperm retrieval and intracytoplasmic sperm injection in men with nonobstructive azoospermia, and treated and untreated varicocele. J Urol. 2009;182:1500–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  85. Esteves SC. Editorial comment. J Urol. 2009;182:1504–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  86. Collodel G, Capitani S, Iacoponi F, et al. Retrospective assessment of potential negative synergistic effects of varicocele and tobacco use on ultrastructural sperm morphology. Urology. 2009;74:794–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  87. Zampieri N, Zamboni C, Ottolenghi A, et al. The role of lifestyle changing to improve the semen quality in patients with varicocele. Minerva Urol Nefrol. 2008;60:199–204.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  88. Agarwal A, Deepinder F, Cocuzza M, et al. Efficacy of varicocelectomy in improving semen parameters: new meta-analytical approach. Urology. 2007;70:532–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  89. Giulini S, Sblendorio V, Xella S, et al. Seminal plasma total antioxidant capacity and semen parameters in patients with varicocele. Reprod Biomed Online. 2009;18:617–21.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  90. Blumer CG, Fariello RM, Restelli AE, et al. Sperm nuclear DNA fragmentation and mitochondrial activity in men with varicocele. Fertil Steril. 2008;90:1716–22.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  91. Talebi AR, Moein MR, Tabibnejad N, et al. Effect of varicocele on chromatin condensation and DNA integrity of ejaculated spermatozoa using cytochemical tests. Andrologia. 2008;40:245–51.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  92. Shiraishi K, Takihara H, Naito K. Testicular volume, scrotal temperature, and oxidative stress in fertile men with left varicocele. Fertil Steril. 2009;91 Suppl 4:1388–91.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  93. Caretta N, Palego P, Schipilliti M, et al. Testicular contrast harmonic imaging to evaluate intratesticular perfusion alterations in patients with varicocele. J Urol. 2010;183:263–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  94. Jeng SY, Wu SM, Lee JD. Cadmium accumulation and metallothionein overexpression in internal spermatic vein of patients with varicocele. Urology. 2009;73:1231–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  95. Ichioka K, Nagahama K, Okubo K, et al. Genetic polymorphisms in glutathione S-transferase T1 affect the surgical outcome of varicocelectomies in infertile patients. Asian J Androl. 2009;11:333–41.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  96. Meng MV, Greene KL, Turek PJ. Surgery or assisted reproduction? A decision analysis of treatment costs in male infertility. J Urol. 2005;174:1926–31.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  97. Ficarra V, Cerruto MA, Liguori G, et al. Treatment of varicocele in subfertile men: the Cochrane Review–a contrary opinion. Eur Urol. 2006;49:258–63.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  98. Marmar JL, Agarwal A, Prabaskan S, et al. Reassessing the value of varicocelectomy as a treatment for male subfertility with a new meta-analysis. Fertil Steril. 2007;88:639–48.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  99. Cervellione RM, Cervato G, Zampieri N, et al. Effect of varicocelectomy on the plasma oxidative stress parameters. J Pediatr Surg. 2006;41:403–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  100. Chen SS, Huang WJ, Chang LS, Wei YH. Attenuation of oxidative stress after varicocelectomy in subfertile patients with varicocele. J Urol. 2008;179:639–42.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  101. Zini A, Blumenfeld A, Libman J, et al. Beneficial effect of microsurgical varicocelectomy on human sperm DNA integrity. Hum Reprod. 2005;20:1018–21.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  102. Moskovtsev SI, Lecker I, Mullen JB, et al. Cause-specific treatment in patients with high sperm DNA damage resulted in significant DNA improvement. Syst Biol Reprod Med. 2009;55:109–15.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  103. Smit M, Romijn JC, Wildhagen MF, et al. Decreased sperm DNA fragmentation after surgical varicocelectomy is associated with increased pregnancy rate. J Urol. 2010;183:270–4.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  104. Cayan S, Erdemir F, Ozbey I, et al. Can varicocelectomy significantly change the way couple use assisted reproductive technologies? J Urol. 2002;167:1749–52.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  105. Esteves SC, Oliveira FV, Bertolla RP. Clinical outcomes of intracytoplasmic sperm injection in infertile men with treated and untreated clinical varicocele. J Urol. 2010 Oct;184(4):1442–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

The author is indebted to Mrs. Fabiola Bento for her editorial assistance and text revision.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Center for Male Reproduction, ANDROFERT, Andrology & Human Reproduction Clinic, Av. Dr. Heitor Penteado, 1464, Campinas, SP, 13075-460, Brazil

    Sandro C. Esteves MD, PhD

Authors
  1. Sandro C. Esteves MD, PhD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sandro C. Esteves MD, PhD .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. University of Florida, Director, Robotic Surgery, Winter Haven Hospital &, 200 Avenue F. N.E., Winter Haven, 33881, Florida, USA

    Sijo J. Parekattil

  2. Center for Reproductive Medicine, Department of Urology, Cleveland Clinic, Euclid Avenue 9500, Cleveland, 44195, Ohio, USA

    Ashok Agarwal

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Esteves, S.C. (2012). Varicocele. In: Parekattil, S., Agarwal, A. (eds) Male Infertility. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3335-4_24

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3335-4_24

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-3334-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-3335-4

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation