Skip to main content

Ethical Dimensions of Urology: Four Case Studies

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Male Infertility

Abstract

In recent years, the progression of medical science has led to what used to be extremely rare ethical problems on the cutting edge of urological management of male infertility to become a more routine part of urological practice. These ethical problems, even though they have become more common in urological practice, still cause significant issues for the physician. In this chapter we discuss four cases that illustrate the ethical problems associated with identification and framing of the ethical problem, analysis of the problem, and the resolution of the problem. The basic purpose of these case discussions is that it is much easier to avoid and/or satisfactorily resolve an ethical problem when it is recognized early before a crisis mode arises or before poor ethical decisions are made and have to be unraveled after the fact. These cases represent four possible scenarios but are by no means exhaustive of the possible ethical issues that may arise from the current urological practice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Neal MS, Nagel K, Duckworth J, Bissessar H, Fischer MA, Portwine C, Tozer R, Barr RD. Effectiveness of sperm banking in adolescents and young adults with cancer: a regional experience. Cancer. 2007;110:1125–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Miller VA, Drotar D, Kodish E. Children’s competence for assent and consent: a review of empirical findings. Ethics Behav. 2004;14:255–96.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Covey Stephen R. The seven habits of highly effective people: powerful lessons in personal change. New York: Simon and Schuster Inc; 1990. p. 237.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Goldstein MM. Health information technology and the idea of informed consent. J Law Med Ethics. 2010;38:27–36.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Howard G. Who asks for vasectomy reversal and why? Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1982;285:490–3.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Lachance D. In re Grady: the mentally retarded individual’s right to choose sterilization. Am J Law Med. 1981;6:559–91.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Zuba-Ruggieri R. Making links, making connections: internet resources for self-advocates and people with developmental disabilities. Intellect Dev Disabil. 2007;45:209–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marc S. Cohen MD .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Cohen, M.S., Moseley, R.E. (2012). Ethical Dimensions of Urology: Four Case Studies. In: Parekattil, S., Agarwal, A. (eds) Male Infertility. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3335-4_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3335-4_16

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-3334-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-3335-4

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics