Abstract
In recent years, the progression of medical science has led to what used to be extremely rare ethical problems on the cutting edge of urological management of male infertility to become a more routine part of urological practice. These ethical problems, even though they have become more common in urological practice, still cause significant issues for the physician. In this chapter we discuss four cases that illustrate the ethical problems associated with identification and framing of the ethical problem, analysis of the problem, and the resolution of the problem. The basic purpose of these case discussions is that it is much easier to avoid and/or satisfactorily resolve an ethical problem when it is recognized early before a crisis mode arises or before poor ethical decisions are made and have to be unraveled after the fact. These cases represent four possible scenarios but are by no means exhaustive of the possible ethical issues that may arise from the current urological practice.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Neal MS, Nagel K, Duckworth J, Bissessar H, Fischer MA, Portwine C, Tozer R, Barr RD. Effectiveness of sperm banking in adolescents and young adults with cancer: a regional experience. Cancer. 2007;110:1125–30.
Miller VA, Drotar D, Kodish E. Children’s competence for assent and consent: a review of empirical findings. Ethics Behav. 2004;14:255–96.
Covey Stephen R. The seven habits of highly effective people: powerful lessons in personal change. New York: Simon and Schuster Inc; 1990. p. 237.
Goldstein MM. Health information technology and the idea of informed consent. J Law Med Ethics. 2010;38:27–36.
Howard G. Who asks for vasectomy reversal and why? Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1982;285:490–3.
Lachance D. In re Grady: the mentally retarded individual’s right to choose sterilization. Am J Law Med. 1981;6:559–91.
Zuba-Ruggieri R. Making links, making connections: internet resources for self-advocates and people with developmental disabilities. Intellect Dev Disabil. 2007;45:209–16.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Cohen, M.S., Moseley, R.E. (2012). Ethical Dimensions of Urology: Four Case Studies. In: Parekattil, S., Agarwal, A. (eds) Male Infertility. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3335-4_16
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3335-4_16
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-3334-7
Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-3335-4
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)