Advertisement

Critical Thinking

  • Robert L. Shewfelt
Chapter

Abstract

As discussed in Chaps. 4 and 9, we must carefully evaluate the articles we read in the scientific literature. Effective analysis of the scientific literature requires special skills, generally grouped as critical thinking. Many sources describe critical thinking (Fisher, 2001; Paul and Elder, 2002; McInerny, 2005; Browne and Keeley, 2011; Burton, 2008). Critical thinking has been defined as

Keywords

Critical Thinking Palm Tree Journal Club Critical Thinking Skill Thought Style 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Afamasaga-Fuata’i K (2008) Students’ conceptual understanding and critical thinking: a case for concept maps and vee-diagrams in mathematics problem solving. Aust Math Teach 64:8–17Google Scholar
  2. Browne MN, Keeley SM (2011) Asking the right questions: a guide to critical thinking, 10th edn. Longman Publishing Group, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  3. Burton R (2008) On being certain: believing you are right even when you are not. St. Martin’s Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  4. Davis A (1954) Let’s eat right to stay fit. Harcourt, Brace, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  5. Dewey J (1909) How we think. D.C. Heath and Company, USAGoogle Scholar
  6. Dufty W (1975) Sugar blues. Chilton Book Co., Radnor, PAGoogle Scholar
  7. Gibbons E (1962) Stalking the wild Asparagus. D. MacKay Co., New YorkGoogle Scholar
  8. Grinnell F (1992) The scientific attitude, 2nd edn. Guilford Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  9. Fisher A (2001) Critical thinking: an introduction. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UKGoogle Scholar
  10. Floros J, Newsome R, Fisher W, Barbosa-C’anovas GV, Chen H, Dunne CP, German JB, Hall RL, Heldman DR, Karwe MV, Knabel SJ, Labuza TP, Lund DB, Newell-McLaughlin M, Robinson JL, Sebranek JG, Shewfelt RL, Tracy WF, Weaver CM, Ziegler GR (2010) Feeding the world today and tomorrow: the importance of food science and technology. An IFT scientific review. Comp Rev Food Sci Technol 9:572–599CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kessler D (2009) The end of overeating: taking control of the insatiable American appetite. Rodale Press, Emmaus, PAGoogle Scholar
  12. McInerny DQ (2005) Being logical: a guide to good thinking. Random House, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  13. Nestle M (2002) Food politics: how the food industry influences nutrition and health. University of California Press, Berkeley, CAGoogle Scholar
  14. Nestle M (2006) What to eat. North Point Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  15. Paarlberg R (2010) Food politics: what everyone needs to know. Oxford Univ. Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  16. Paul RW, Elder L (2002) Critical thinking: tools for taking charge of your professional and personal life. FT Press, Upper Saddle River, NJGoogle Scholar
  17. Pollan M (2008) In defense of food: an eater’s manifesto. Penguin Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  18. Pollan M (2009) Food rules. Penguin Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  19. Taleb NN (2010) The black swan: the impact of the highly improbable. Random House, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  20. Thubron C (1978) Istanbul. Time-Life Books, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  21. Turner JS (1970) The Chemical Feast, the Ralph Nader Study Group Report on Food P Protection and the Food and Drug Administration. Grossman Publishers, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  22. West DC, Pomeroy JR, Park JK, Gerstenberger EA, Sandoval J (2000) Critical thinking in graduate medical education: a role for concept mapping assessment? JAMA 284:1105–1110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Worwood VA (1991) The complete book of essential oils and aromatherapy. New World Library, San Rafael, CAGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robert L. Shewfelt
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Food Science & Technology Food Process Research & Development LaboratoryUniversity of GeorgiaAthensUSA

Personalised recommendations