Skip to main content

Product Differentiation

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
New Perspectives on Industrial Organization

Part of the book series: Springer Texts in Business and Economics ((STBE))

  • 4927 Accesses

Abstract

In our discussion of monopolistic competition in the previous chapter, competing firms produced differentiated products. This occurs when firms sell products that vary slightly from one brand to another. Two loaves of wheat bread may be the same in every way except that one is thin sliced and the other is thick sliced. Although a Mazda Miata and Porsche 911 are both sports cars, they differ in terms of style, power, and fuel economy. This is in contrast to perfectly competitive markets, where products are perfectly homogeneous.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    For a review of the literature and practical concerns with the law of one price, see Lamont and Thaler (2003).

  2. 2.

    This information is available at http://www.edmunds.com.

  3. 3.

    Of course, they have different packaging and are marketed in different ways. These issues will be discussed in later chapters.

  4. 4.

    Thus, it is sometimes called a representative consumer model. Dixit (1979) derives this demand system from the representative consumer’s utility function U(q 1, q 2) = α 1 q 1 + α 2 q 2 − (β 1 q 21  + β 2 q 22  + 2γq 1 q 2)/2. In our specification, we let a = α 1 = α 2, β 1 = β 2 = 1, and d = γ.

  5. 5.

    For a discussion of a circular city model as described in Fig. 7.1, see Salop (1979) and Tirole (1988).

  6. 6.

    In other words, consumers are making discrete purchases, buying 0 or 1 unit at a time. This is common with durable goods, for example, where most consumers buy just one house, automobile, or microwave oven at a time.

  7. 7.

    This is derived as follows. From above, d m1 = θ m and d m2 = 1 − θ m . Thus, U m1 = s − p 1 − td m1 = s − p 1− tθ m and U m2 = s − p 2 − t(1−θ m ). Setting U m1 = U m2 and solving for θ m leads to the following result: θ m  = (t − p 1 + p 2)/(2t).

  8. 8.

    In many applications, N is normalized to 1 for simplicity.

  9. 9.

    When this happens, consumers may decide to buy a different good. For example, a substantial increase in the price of cookies will cause some consumers to switch to ice cream, which is called an outside good.

  10. 10.

    That is, if the distance between firms 1 and 2 is 1/n, and the distance between firm 1 and consumer x is distance x, then the distance between firm 2 and consumer x is (1/n − x). We use x instead of θ x to simplify the notation.

  11. 11.

    For example, the strength of preference for quality could be a positive function of consumer income, with richer consumers having a stronger preference (i.e., willingness and ability to pay) for quality.

  12. 12.

    If φ L < x, the market would be uncovered because consumers with preferences within the x−φ L interval would opt out of the market (i.e., they would buy neither brand 1 nor brand 2).

  13. 13.

    There are exceptions. In our discussion of damaged goods in Chap. 14, we show that it can be profitable for a multiproduct firm to produce and sell both a high and a low quality brands even though the low quality brand is more expensive to produce than the high quality brand.

  14. 14.

    Nelson (1970, 1974) identified search and experience goods, and Darby and Karni (1973) identified credence goods.

References

  • Bowley AL (1924) Mathematical groundwork of economics: an introductory treatise. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Chamberlin E (1933) The theory of monopolistic competition. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixit A (1979) A model of duopoly suggesting a theory of entry. Bell J Econ 10(1):20–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hotelling H (1929) Stability in competition. Econ J 39:41–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lamont OA, Thaler RH (2003) Anomalies: the law of one price in financial markets. J Econ Perspect 17(4):191–202, Fall

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lancaster KJ (1966) A new approach to consumer theory. J Polit Econ 74:132–157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson P (1970) Information and consumer behavior. J Polit Econ 78:311–329

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson P (1974) Advertising as information. J Polit Econ 82:729–754

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salop S (1979) Monopolistic competition with outside goods. Bell J Econ 10:141–156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tirole J (1988) The theory of industrial organization. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Tremblay, V.J., Tremblay, C.H. (2012). Product Differentiation. In: New Perspectives on Industrial Organization. Springer Texts in Business and Economics. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3241-8_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics