Abstract
Neural functions are fundamental to learning, instruction, and performance. Although tremendous progress has been made in neuroscience in the past two decades, its applications in educational research are just beginning to be realized. This review focuses on selected technologies, methods, and findings from neuroscience that have important implications for educational sciences. Specifically, this chapter discusses conceptual and empirical research on the use, implications, and limitations of neuroimaging techniques such as continuous electroencephalography, event-related potentials, and functional magnetic resonance imaging in the domains of language and reading, mathematics learning, problem solving, cognitive load, and affective processes in learning. Neuroimaging has enabled scientists to open “the black box” of neural activity that underlies learning. It seems timely, therefore, to consider how educational researchers may employ the increased understanding of brain function to explore educational questions.
Nicht das Gehirn denkt, sondern wir denken das Gehirn
(The brain does not think, we think the brain.)
Friedrich Nietzsche
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Anderson, J. R., Betts, S., Ferris, J. L., & Fincham, J. M. (2011). Cognitive and metacognitive activity in mathematical problem solving: Prefrontal and parietal patterns. Cognitive, Affective, and Behavioral Neuroscience, 11(1), 52–67.
Anderson, J. R., Carter, C. S., Fincham, J. M., Qin, Y., Ravizza, S. M., & Rosenberg-Lee, M. (2008). Using fMRI to test models of complex cognition. Cognitive Science, 32, 1323–1348.
*Andreassi, J. L. (2007). Psychophysiology: Human behavior and physiological response. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Ansari, D., & Coch, D. (2006). Bridges over troubled waters: Education and cognitive neuroscience. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10, 146–151.
Antonenko, P., & Niederhauser, D. (2010). The influence of leads on cognitive load and learning in a hypertext-assisted learning environment. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(2), 140–150.
Antonenko, P., Paas, F., Grabner, R., & van Gog, T. (2010). Using electroencephalography (EEG) to measure cognitive load. Educational Psychology Review, 22, 425–438.
*Basar, E., (1999). Brain function and oscillations. Berlin: Springer.
Bear, M. F., Connors, B., & Paradiso, M. A. (2006). Neuroscience: Exploring the brain (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Williams & Wilkins.
*Berntson, G. G., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2009). Handbook of neuroscience for the behavioral sciences. New York, NY: Wiley.
Boekaerts, M. (2003). Toward a model that integrates motivation, affect, and learning. British Journal of Educational Psychology Monograph Series, II, 173–189.
Bowden, E. M., & Beeman, M. J. (1998). Getting the right idea: Semantic activation in the right hemisphere may help solve insight problems. Psychological Science, 9, 435–440.
Brodmann, K. (1909). Vegleichende Lokalisationslehre der Grosshirnde. Barth, Leipzig.
Bruer, J. T. (1997). Education and the brain: A bridge too far. Educational Researcher, 26(8), 4–16.
Bruer, J. T. (1999). The myth of the first three years: A new understanding of early brain development and lifelong learning. New York, NY: The Free Press.
Bruer, J. T. (2006). Points of view: On the implications of neuroscience research for science teaching and learning: Are there any? A skeptical theme and variations: The primacy of psychology in the science of learning. CBE Life Sciences Education, 5(2), 104–110.
Carnegie Task Force. (1996). Years of promise: A comprehensive learning strategy for America’s children. New York, NY: Carnegie Corporation of New York.
Clark, R. E. (2010). Cognitive and neuroscience research on learning and instruction: Recent insights about the impact of non-conscious knowledge on problem solving, higher order thinking skills and interactive cyber-learning environments. International Conference on Education Research (ICER), Seoul, South Korea.
Dash, P. K., Herbert, A. E., & Runyan, J. D. (2004). A unified theory for systems and cellular memory consolidation. Brain Research Reviews, 45, 30–37.
De Jong, T., Van Gog, T., Jenks, K., Manlove, S., Van Hell, J. G., Jolles, J., et al. (2009). Explorations in learning and the brain: On the potential of cognitive neuroscience for educational science. Berlin: Springer.
Dehaene, S. (1997). The number sense: How the mind creates mathematics. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Dehaene, S. (2009). Reading in the brain: The science and evolution of a human invention. New York, NY: Penguin.
Dehaene, S., Spelke, E., Stanescu, R., Pinel, P., & Tsivkin, S. (1999). Sources of mathematical thinking: Behavioral and brain-imaging evidence. Science, 284, 970–974.
Diamond, M. C. (2001). Response of the brain to enrichment. Annals of the Brazilian Academy of Sciences, 73(2).
Dolcos, F., & Cabeza, R. (2002). Event-related potentials of emotional memory: Encoding pleas- ant, unpleasant, and neutral pictures. Cognitive, Affective, and Behavioral Neuroscience, 2, 252–263.
Fischer, K. W. (2009). Mind, brain, and education: Building a scientific groundwork for learning and teaching. Mind, Brain, and Education, 3, 2–15.
*Fischer, K. W., Daniel, D. B., Immordino-Yang, M. H., Stern, E., Battro, A., & Koizumi, H. (2007). Why mind, brain, and education? Why now? Mind, Brain, and Education, 1, 1–2.
Fledge, J., & Fletcher, K. (1992). Talker and listener effects on the perception of degree of foreign accent. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 91, 370–389.
Friedman, D., Cycowicz, Y. M., & Gaeta, H. (2001). The novelty P3: An event-related brain potential (ERP) sign of the brain’s evaluation of novelty. Neurosceince and Biobehavioral Reviews, 25, 355–373.
Gerlic, I., & Jausovec, N. (1999). Multimedia: Differences in cognitive processes observed with EEG. Educational Technology Research and Development, 47(3), 5–14.
Gerson, A., Parra, L. C., & Sajda, P. (2005). Cortical origins of response time variability during rapid discrimination of visual objects. Neuroimage, 28, 342–353.
Gevins, A. S., & Smith, M. E. (2008). EEG in neuroergonomics. In R. Parasuraman & M. Rizzo (Eds.), Neuroergonomics: The brain at work. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Goleman, D. (1995). Emotional intelligence. New York, NY: Bantam Books.
Gopnik, A., Meltzoff, A. N., & Kuhl, P. K. (1999). The scientist in the crib: Minds, brains and how children learn. New York, NY: Harper Collins.
Goswami, U. (2004). Neuroscience and education. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 74, 1–14.
Goswami, U. (2006). Neuroscience and education: From research to practice? Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 7, 406–411.
Goswami, U. (2009). Mind, brain, and literacy: Biomarkers as usable knowledge for education. Mind, Brain, and Education, 3, 176–184.
Haapalainen, E., Kim S., Forlizzi, J., & Dey A. (2010). Psychophysiological measures for assessing cognitive load. Proceedings of the 12th ACM International Conference on Ubiquitous Computing (pp. 301–310).
Hirshfield, L. M., Chauncey, K., Gulotta, R., Girouard, A., Solovey, E. T., Jacob, R. J. K., et al. (2009). Combining electroencephalograph and functional near infrared spectroscopy to explore users’ mental workload. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (pp. 239–247). Berlin: Springer.
Jobard, G., Crivello, F., & Tzourio-Mazoyer, N. (2003). Evaluation of the dual route theory or reading: A meta-analysis of 35 neuroimaging studies. Neuroimage, 20, 693–712.
Jolles, J., de Groot, R., van Benthem, J., Dekkers, H., de Glopper, C., & Uijlings, H. (2006). Brain lessons: A contribution to the international debate on brain, learning and education. Maastricht: NeuroPsych.
Jones, E. G., & Mendell, L. M. (1999). Assessing the decade of the brain. Science, 284, 739.
Jung, K.-J., Prasad, P., Qin, Y., & Anderson, J. R. (2005). Extraction of overt verbal response from acoustic noise from the scanner in fMRI by use of segmented active noise cancellation. Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 53, 739–744.
Jung-Beeman, M., Bowden, E. M., Haberman, J., Frymiare, J. L., Arambel-Liu, S., & Greenblatt, R. (2004). Neural activity when people solve verbal problems with insight. PLoS Biology, 2, 500–510.
Katz, L., & Frost, R. (1992). The reading process is different for different orthographies: The orthographic depth hypothesis. In R. Frost & L. Katz (Eds.), Orthography, phonology, morphology, and meaning: Advances in psychology (Vol. 94, pp. 67–84). Oxford: North Holland.
Kerr, D. S., Campbell, L. W., Applegate, M. D., Brodish, A., & Landfield, P. W. (1991). Chronic stress-induced acceleration of electrophysiologic and morphometric biomarkers of hippocampal aging. Journal of Neuroscience, 11, 1316–1326.
Khader, P., Jost, K., Ranganath, C., & Rösler, F. (2010). Theta and alpha oscillations during working memory maintenance predict successful long-term memory encoding. Neuroscience Letters, 468, 339–343.
Kringelbach, M. L. (2009). Neural basis of mental representations of motivation, emotion and pleasure. In G. G. Berntson & J. T. Cacioppo (Eds.), Handbook of neuroscience for the behavioral sciences (pp. 807–828). New York, NY: Wiley.
Marshall, S. P. (2007). Identifying cognitive state from eye metrics. Aviation, Space, & Environmental Medicine, 78(5), 165–175.
Martin-Loeches, M., Casado, P., Hernández-Tamames, J. A., & Álvarez-Linera, J. (2008). Brain activation in discourse comprehension: A 3t fMRI study. Neuroimage, 41, 614–622.
Mayer, R. E. (2008). Learning and instruction (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Merrill Prentice Hall.
Menon, V., Mackenzie, K., Rivera, S. M., & Reiss, A. L. (2002). Prefrontal cortex involvement in processing incorrect arithmetic equations: Evidence from event-related fMRI. Human Brain Mapping, 16(3), 119–130.
Metcalfe, J. (1986). Feeling of knowing in memory and problem solving. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 12, 288–294.
Minnery, B. S., & Fine, M. (2009). Neuroscience and the future of human-computer interaction. Interactions, 16(2), 70–75.
National Council for Accreditation of Teacher Education. (2010). The road less traveled: How the developmental sciences can prepare educators to improve student achievement. Retrieved from: http://www.ncate.org/dotnetnuke/LinkClick.aspx?fileticket=gY3FtiptMSo%3D&tabid=706
National Reading Panel. (2000). Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction (NIH Publication No. 00-4769). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
National Research Council. (2005). How students learn: History, mathematics, and science in the classroom. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
Neville, H. J., & Bruer, J. T. (2001). Language processing: How experience affects brain organization. In D. B. Bailey Jr., J. T. Bruer, F. J. Symons, & J. W. Lichtman (Eds.), Critical thinking about critical periods (pp. 151–172). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
Office of Economic Cooperation and Development. (2002). Understanding the brain: Towards a new learning science. Paris: Office of Economic Cooperation and Development.
*Office of Economic Cooperation and Development. (2007). Understanding the brain: The birth of a learning science. Paris: Office of Economic Cooperation and Development.
Paas, F., Tuovinen, J. E., Tabbers, H. K., & Van Gerven, P. W. M. (2003). Cognitive load measurement as a means to advance cognitive load theory. Educational Psychologist, 38(1), 63–71.
Paulesu, E., McCrory, E., Fazio, F., Menoncello, L., Brunswick, N., Cappa, S., et al. (2000). A cultural effect on brain function. Nature Neuroscience, 3(1), 91–96.
Pfurtscheller, G., & Lopes da Silva, F. (2005). EEG event-related desynchronization (ERD) and event-related synchronization (ERS). In E. Niedermeyer & F. Lopes da Silva (Eds.), Electroencephalography, basic principles, clinical applications and related fields (pp. 1003–1016). Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins.
Qin, Y., Carter, C. S., Silk, E., Stenger, V. A., Fissell, K., Goode, A., et al. (2004). The change of the brain activation patterns as children learn algebra equation solving. Proceedings of National Academy of Sciences, 101(15), 5686–5691.
Ravizza, S. M., Anderson, J. R., & Carter, C. S. (2008). Errors of mathematical processing: The relationship of accuracy to neural regions associated with retrieval or representation of the problem state. Brain Research, 1238, 118–126.
Sandkuhler, S., & Bhattacharya, J. (2008). Deconstructing insight: EEG correlates of insightful problem solving. PLoS One, 3(1), 1–12.
Sapolsky, R. M., Romero, L. M., & Munck, A. U. (2000). How do glucocorticoids influence stress-responses? Integrating permissive, suppressive, stimulatory, and adaptive actions. Endocrine Reviews, 21, 55–89.
Schultheis, H., & Jameson, A. (2004). Assessing cognitive load in adaptive hypermedia systems: Physiological and behavioral methods. In P. De Bra & W. Nejdl (Eds.), Adaptive hypermedia and adaptive web-based systems (pp. 225–234). Berlin: Springer.
Shaywitz, B., Shaywitz, S., Pugh, K., Mencl, W., Fulbright, R., & Skudlarski, P. (2002). Disruption of posterior brain systems for reading in children with developmental dyslexia. Biological Psychiatry, 52(2), 101–110.
Shi, Y., Ruiz, N., Taib, R., Choi, E., & Chen, F. (2007). Galvanic skin response (GSR) as an index of cognitive load. Proceedings of the SIG CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 2651–2656). San Jose, CA.
Simpson, J. R., Öngür, D., Akbudak, E., Conturo, T. E., Ollinger, J. M., & Snyder, A. Z. (2000). The emotional modulation of cognitive processing: An fMRI study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 12, 157–170.
Snow, C. E., Burns, M. S., & Griffin, P. (1998). Preventing reading difficulties in young children. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Soller, A., & Stevens, R. (2007). Applications of stochastic analyses for collaborative learning and cognitive assessment. In G. R. Hancock & K. M. Samuelsen (Eds.), Advances in latent variable mixture models (pp. 217–253). Charlotte, NC: Information Age.
Stevens, R. H., Galloway, T., & Berka, C. (2007). Allocation of time, workload, engagement and distraction as students acquire problem solving skills. In D. Schmorrow, D. Nicholson, J. Drexler, & L. Reeves (Eds.), Foundations of augmented cognition (pp. 128–137). Arlington, VA: Strategic Analysis.
Stevens, R. H., Galloway, T., Berka, C., Johnson, R., & Sprang, M. (2008). Assessing student’s mental representations of complex problem spaces with EEG technologies. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 52nd Annual Meeting (pp. 22–26). New York.
Stuss, D. T., & Knight, R. T. (2002). Principles of frontal lobe function. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Sweller, J. (2010). Element interactivity and intrinsic, extraneous and germane cognitive load. Educational Psychology Review, 22, 123–138.
Sweller, J., van Merriënboer, J. J. G., & Paas, F. (1998). Cognitive architecture and instructional design. Educational Psychology Review, 10, 251–295.
Sylwester, R. (2010). A child’s brain: The need for nurture. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
Terry, R. D., DeTeresa, R., & Hansen, L. A. (1987). Neocortical cell counts in normal human adult aging. Annals of Neurology, 21, 530–539.
Thompson, P. M., & Toga, A. W., (2000). Handbook of medical imaging: Processing and analysis. Academic Press, San Diego.
Tosetti, P., Nagy, Z., & Bernard, V. (2008). Brain research EU funding (2002–2008). Retrieved from ftp://ftp.cordis.europa.eu/pub/fp7/docs/brain-research-eu-funding_en.pdf
Turkeltaub, P. E., Gareau, L., Flowers, D. L., Zeffiro, T. A., & Eden, G. F. (2003). Development of neural mechanisms for reading. Nature Neuroscience, 6(7), 767–773.
Ullsperger, M., & Debener, S. (2010). Simultaneous EEG and fMRI: Recording, analysis, and application. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Varma, S., McCandliss, B. D., & Schwartz, D. L. (2008). Scientific and pragmatic challenges for bridging education and neuroscience. Educational Researcher, 37(3), 140–152.
Wilson, G. F., & Russell, C. A. (2003). Real-time assessment of mental workload using psychophysiological measures and artificial neural networks. Human Factors, 45, 635–643.
Xie, B., & Salvendy, G. (2000). Review and reappraisal of modeling and predicting mental workload in single- and multi-task environments. Work and Stress, 14(1), 74–99.
Zago, L., Pesenti, M., Mellet, E., Crivello, F., Mazoyer, B., & Tzourio-Mazoyer, N. (2001). Neural correlates of simple and complex mental calculation. Neuroimage, 13, 314–327.
Ziegler, J. C., & Goswami, U. (2006). Becoming literate in different languages: Similar problems, different solutions. Developmental Science, 9, 429–436.
Acknowledgements
Pavlo Antonenko is grateful to the National Aeronautics and Space Administration for providing financial support for a portion of this work (#NNX10AV03A and #NNX08AJ14A).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Antonenko, P.D., van Gog, T., Paas, F. (2014). Implications of Neuroimaging for Educational Research. In: Spector, J., Merrill, M., Elen, J., Bishop, M. (eds) Handbook of Research on Educational Communications and Technology. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3185-5_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3185-5_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-3184-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-3185-5
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)