Skip to main content

Web 1.0 and Web 2.0: An Anglo-Portuguese Research Project on the Impact of Using Technology in Science Education Programmes

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Media in Education

Abstract

This paper will focus on some valuable insights related to the impact of Science Education programmes, which use innovative methodologies for the professional development of student teachers and in-service primary teachers, within the classroom. The work is part of an Anglo-Portuguese research project, involving the University of Aveiro (UA) in Portugal and Bradford College University Centre (BC) in UK. The design of innovative teacher education methodologies that were implemented in the two institutions included the use of Web 1.0 and Web 2.0 tools. The team collaboratively identified quality evaluation criteria of teaching practices and defined the evaluation criteria: (1) effective teaching; (2) impact on learning; and (3) suggestions for improving future versions of the curricula. The data were collected using a questionnaire and interviews with student teachers and in-service primary teachers (BC and UA respectively), in both Higher Education contexts. The main findings highlight the importance of giving teachers opportunities to use Web technologies in Science Education programmes so that they feel more confident in applying them in their practice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Arnold, S. R., Padilla, M. J., & Tunhikorn, B. (2009). The development of pre-service science teachers’ professional knowledge in utilizing ICT to support professional lives. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 5(2), 91–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Costa, F. A. (2008). A utilização das TIC em contexto educativo. Representações e práticas de professores. Lisboa: Tese não publicada, Universidade de Lisboa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Creswell, J. (2003). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (2nd Edition). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department for Education and Skills. (2004). Key Stage 3. National Strategy ICT across the curriculum. ICT in science ICT across the curriculum (ICTAC) pack: Creating opportunity, releasing potential, achieving excellence.

    Google Scholar 

  • Europe Unit: http://www.europeunit.ac.uk/sites/europe_unit2/bologna_process/uk_policy_positions/uk_position_on_qualification_length.cfm

  • González, J., & Wagenaar, R. (2008). Universitie’s contributions to the Bologna Process. An Introduction (2ed.). Bilbao: Universidad de Deusto.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham, C.R., Burgoyne, N., Cantrell, P., Smith, L., Clair, L.S., & Harris, R. (2010). TPACK Development in Science Teaching: Measuring the TPACK Confidence of Inservice Science Teachers. TechTrends 53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guerra, C., Moreira, A., & Vieira, R. (2010). Towards the definition of a teacher education program for the use of ICT tools in science teaching and learning. In B. Lazar & R. Reinhardt (Eds.), XIV IOSTE—International organization for science and technology education. Bled (Eslovenia): IOSTE Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guerra, C., Pombo, L., & Moreira, A. (2011). Innovative technologies in science teaching. Primary Science, 120, 26–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jimoyiannis, A. (2010). Designing and implementing an integrated technological pedagogical science knowledge framework for science teachers professional development. Computers & Education, 55, 1259–1269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Juuti, K., Lavonen, J., Aksela, M., & Meisalo, V. (2009). Adoption of ICT in science education: A case study of Communication Channels in A Teachers’ Professional Development Project. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 5(2), 103–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moreira, A., Loureiro, M. J., & Marques, L. (2005). Percepções de professores e gestores de escolas relativas aos obstáculos à integração das TIC no ensino das ciências. Actas do VII Congreso Internacional sobre Investigación en la Didáctica de las Ciencias: Educación científica para la ciudadanía. Granada.0212–4521.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, D. (1988). Focus Group as qualitative research. Newbury park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Education Research Forum/NERF. (2000). The impact of Educational Research on Policy and Practice. Sub-group of NERF Report. http://www.nerf-uk.org/documents/

  • Osborne, J., & Dillon, J. (2008). Science education in Europe: Critical reflections. London: The Nuffield Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pombo, L., & Costa, N. (2009). The impact of Biology/Geology School Teachers masters courses on the improvement of Science Education quality in Portugal. Research in Science & Technological Education, 27(1), 31–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pombo, L., Guerra, C., Moreira, A., Smith, M., Hoath, L., & Howard, D. (2010). Evaluation of the quality of Science Education programmes that use Web 2.0 tools – an Anglo-Portuguese Research Project. In F.A. Costa, (Org). In F.A. Costa, G.L. Miranda, J.F. Matos, I. Chagas, E. Cruz (Org). I Encontro Internacional TIC e Educação Proceedings – Inovação Curricular com TIC. (pp. 407–414). Institute of Education, University of Lisbon, Portugal.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, D., Baran, E., Thompson, A. D., Mishra, P., Koehler, M., & Shin, T. (2009). Technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK): The development and validation of an assessment instrument for preservice teachers. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 42, 123–149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uğur, B., Akkoyunlu, B., & Kurbanoğlu, S. (2011). Students’ opinions on blended learning and its implementation in terms of their learning styles. Education and Information Technologies, 16, 5–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lúcia Pombo .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Pombo, L., Guerra, C., Moreira, A., Hoath, L., Howard, D., Smith, M. (2012). Web 1.0 and Web 2.0: An Anglo-Portuguese Research Project on the Impact of Using Technology in Science Education Programmes. In: Moreira, A., Benavides, O., Mendes, A. (eds) Media in Education. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3175-6_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics