Skip to main content

Fountain House and Community Psychiatry

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 2361 Accesses

Abstract

Prior to the 1960s, most people suffering from severe mental illness were housed in state mental hospitals. Although asylums for the insane evolved from a caring, therapeutic approach of the moral treatment, a century later these institutions had become overcrowded, underfunded, and hardly reflective of the humane values upon which they were originally based. With the passage of the Community Mental Health Centers Act of 1963, a new chapter was announced in the care and treatment of people suffering from mental illness; they should be able to live in society like everyone else. Deinstitutionalization was one of the largest social experiments in American history in which close to one-half million people moved out of these institutions and back into their communities (Grob 1994). This occurred, however, without sufficient social supports in place, and with even less understanding of the impact that the resulting homelessness, unemployment, and drug addiction would have in the lives of people struggling with mental illness. Furthermore, former patients were expected to live in communities where the stigma associated with mental illness caused them to be viewed with both fear and suspicion. Torrey (1997) has described the result as a psychiatric “Titanic.” Others commenting on the current challenges facing community mental health (Rosenberg and Rosenberg 2006) found the current shape of mental health practice as a “fragmented system of care” (p. 3). More pointedly, the President’s New Freedom Commission on Mental Health (2003) characterized it as “in disarray” (Executive Summary, p. 4). There are no consistent theories of treatment and the funding system is ill-suited to the demands of those in need. In effect, the goal of deinstitutionalization—namely, that people suffering from mental illness can live and function in society—is a book whose final chapter has yet to be written.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Traitement morale, or the moral treatment, was a psychological treatment for people suffering from mental illness developed by the renowned French physician Philippe Pinel in the late-eighteenth-century. It emphasized therapeutic observations and discussions, and an environment conducive to a humane, caring approach to mental illness.

  2. 2.

    The term working community™ is used by Fountain House to describe its signature approach to supporting its members in recovery from mental illness.

  3. 3.

    Mandiberg (2010) notes the importance of such relationships, which are currently overlooked in hospital discharge planning for psychiatric patients.

  4. 4.

    May 3, 1949 minutes of the Professional Advisory Committee, Fountain House, New York.

  5. 5.

    This episode is explored in Anderson’s (1998) history of Fountain House We Are Not Alone. It is of note that the same dichotomy exists today over who should be in charge of recovery in mental illness—the patient or the professional. John Beard resolved this conflict in a manner that empowered both the patients and the professionals in a collaborative process.

  6. 6.

    A similar movement was taking place in England with the therapeutic community of Jones (1953) that involved the entire hospital community in contributing to the recovery process.

  7. 7.

    Additionally, Fountain House operates an international training institute, a professional art gallery for member artists to sell their paintings, and a rural farm in northern New Jersey.

  8. 8.

    Figures do not include the number of staff separately employed in the Fountain House housing program.

  9. 9.

    Transitional employment was an innovation wherein Fountain House partnered with employers in establishing a temporary position for its members to test out their abilities and establish a work history.

  10. 10.

    http://www.nrepp.samhsa.gov/ViewIntervention.aspx?id=189. The generic term “ICCD Clubhouse,” with Fountain House as its originator, is the actual listing to reflect the partnership of many strong clubhouses in the United States and around the world in achieving this goal.

  11. 11.

    Now featured in Section 2703 of Public Law 111-148, the Affordable Care Act of 2010.

References

  • Anderson, S. B. (1998). We are not alone: Fountain House and the development of the clubhouse culture. New York: Fountain House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anthony, W. A. (1993). Recovery from mental illness: The guiding vision of the mental health service system in the 1990’s. Psychosocial Rehabilitation Journal, 16, 11–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aquila, R., Santos, G., Malamud, T. J., & McCrory, D. (1999). The rehabilitation alliance in practice: The clubhouse connection. Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal, 23(1), 19–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beard, J. H. (1978). Transcript of beard unplugged (video tape). New York: Fountain House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beard, J. H., Goertzel, V., & Pearce, A. J. (1958). The effectiveness of activity group therapy with ­chronically regressed adult schizophrenics. Inter­national Journal of Group Psychotherapy, 8(2), 123–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borkman, T. J. (1999). Understanding self-help/mutual aid: Experiential learning in the commons. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chamberlin, J. (1978). On our own: Patient-controlled alternatives to the mental health system. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chamberlin, J., Rogers, E. S., & Ellison, M. L. (1993). Self-help programs: A description of their characteristics and their members. Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal, 19(3), 34–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deci, E. L., & Flaste, R. (1995). Why we do what we do: Understanding self- motivation. New York: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self determination in human behavior. New York: Plenum.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Doyle, A., Lanoil, J., & Dudek, K. (in press). Need to be needed: Community as social practice in mental health. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • General Accounting Office. (1977). Returning the mentally disabled to the community: Government needs to do more (HRD-76-152). Washington, DC: GAO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, M. (1953). The therapeutic community. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lamb, H. R. (1994). A century and a half of psychiatric rehabilitation in the United States. Hospital & Community Psychiatry, 45(10), 1015–1020.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg, J., & Rosenberg, S. J. (2006). Introduction: Conceptualizing the challenges in community mental health. In J. Rosenberg & S. J. Rosenberg (Eds.), Community mental health: Challenges for the 21st century (pp. 1–3). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mandiberg, J. M. (2010). Another way: Enclave communities for people with mental illness. The American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 80(2), 167–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marwaha, S., & Johnson, S. (2004). Schizophrenia and employment: A review. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 39, 337–349.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mechanic, D., Blider, S., & McAlpine, D. D. (2002). Employing persons with serious mental illness. Health Affairs, 21(5), 242–253.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Milazzo-Sayre, L. J., Henderson, M. J., Manderscheid, R. W., Bokossa, M. C., Evans, C., & Male, A. A. (2001). Persons treated in specialty mental health care programs in the United States, 1997. In R. W. Manderscheid & M. J. Henderson (Eds.), Mental health, United States, 2000. DHHS Pub. No. SMA 01-3537. Rockville, MD: Center for Mental Health Services.

    Google Scholar 

  • President’s New Freedom Commission on Mental Health. (2003). Achieving the promise: Transforming mental health care in America, final report. Retrieved July 22, 2003, from http://www.mentalhealthcommission.gov/reports/FinalReport/FullReport.htm.

  • Propst, R. N. (1997). Stages in realizing the international diffusion of a single way of working: The clubhouse model. New Directions for Mental Health Services, 74, 53–66.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg, J., & Rosenberg, S. J. (2006). Introduction: Conceptualizing the challenges in community mental health. In J. Rosenberg & S. J. Rosenberg (Eds.), Community mental health: Challenges for the 21st century (pp. 1–3). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubin, A. (1991). Case management. In S. Rose (Ed.), Case management and social work practice (pp. 5–20). White Plains, NY: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarason, S. B. (1974). The psychological sense of community: Prospects for a community psychology. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shah, N. R. (2011). From transcript of remarks at the opening of the Sidney Baer Center, June 14, 2011. New York: Fountain House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torrey, E. F. (1997). Out of the shadows: Confronting America’s mental illness crisis. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waters, B. (1992). The work unit: The heart of the clubhouse. Psychosocial Rehabilitation Journal, 16, 41–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alan Doyle EdD .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Doyle, A. (2012). Fountain House and Community Psychiatry. In: McQuistion, H., Sowers, W., Ranz, J., Feldman, J. (eds) Handbook of Community Psychiatry. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3149-7_30

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics