Abstract
Clustering creates collectives of cases that have similar properties with a degree of distinctiveness. Clustering requires some composite measure of similarity or disparity, a criterion for conformity among collectives (linkage), and a strategy for configuring collectives. The collectives produced by a clustering method are conventionally called clusters. There are many methods of clustering, however, which typically differ to some degree in the groupings that result (Abonyi and Balaz 2007; Everitt et al. 2001; Kaufman and Rousseeuw 1990; Xu and Wunsch 2009). It is by comparing the collectives produced by different methods of clustering that one can gain insight from inconsistencies and have some confidence relative to consistencies. We call this comparative or complementary clustering and we use the term contingents (groups from groupings) for collectives of cases that emerge from this compound approach using cross-tabulations. Preliminary prioritization can be done among contingents and then progress to comparisons within contingents so that the computational complexities of comprehensive comparisons can be controlled.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Abonyi J, Balaz F (2007) Cluster analysis for data mining and system identification. Birkhauser, Berlin
Basu S, Davidson I, Wagstaff K (2009) Constrained clustering: advances in algorithms, theory, and applications. Chapman & Hall/CRC, Boca Raton, FL
Breiman L, Freidman J, Olsen R, Stone C (1998) Classification and regression trees (CART). Chapman & Hall/CRC, Boca Raton, FL
Everitt B, Landau S, Leese M (2001) Cluster analysis. Arnold, London
Fielding A (2007) Cluster and classification techniques for the biosciences. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Gan G, Ma C, Ma C, Wu J (2007) Data clustering: theory, algorithms, and applications. SIAM, Philadelphia, PA
Halgamuge S, Wang L (eds) (2005) Classification and clustering for knowledge discovery. Springer, Dordrecht
Hardle W, Simar L (2007) Applied multivariate statistical analysis. Springer, Berlin
Kaufman L, Rousseeuw P (1990) Finding groups in data: an introduction to cluster analysis. Wiley, New York
Long B, Zhang Z, Yu P (2010) Relational data clustering: models, algorithms and applications. Chapman & Hall/CRC, Boca Raton, FL
Lumley T (2010) Complex surveys: a guide to analysis using R. Wiley, Hoboken, NJ
Mirkin B (2005) Clustering for data mining: a data recovery approach. Chapman & Hall/CRC, Boca Raton, FL
Myers W, Patil GP (2006) Pattern-based compression of multi-band image data for landscape analysis. Springer, New York
Myers W, McKenney-Easterling M, Hychka K, Griscom B, Bishop J, Bayard A, Rocco G, Brooks R, Constantz G, Patil GP, Taillie C (2006) Contextual clustering for configuring collaborative conservation of watershed in the Mid-Atlantic Highlands. Environ Ecol Stat 13(4):391–407
Podani J (2000) Introduction to the exploration of multivariate biological data. Backhuys, Leiden
Xu R, Wunsch D (2009) Clustering. Wiley, New York
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Myers, W.L., Patil, G.P. (2012). Comparative Clustering for Contingent Collectives. In: Multivariate Methods of Representing Relations in R for Prioritization Purposes. Environmental and Ecological Statistics, vol 6. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3122-0_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3122-0_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-3121-3
Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-3122-0
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)