Benchmarking Practices: Analysis and Assessment

  • Sanjay Mohapatra


In Chap. 2, we have given the classification system for practices of benchmarking. External and internal classifications constitute one such classification. Among different classifications, these two classifications are frequently used for improving measuring performances and improving the present level of performance. In this chapter, an analysis is made of different benchmarking practices and wherever possible, suitable examples are given.


Project Manager Development Project Business Unit Life Cycle Stage Software Industry 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Boehm B (1981) Software engineering economics (original COCOMO). Prentice-Hall, Englewood CliffsGoogle Scholar
  2. Cutter Consortium (2000) IT organization, benchmark thyself. Cutter Consortium, pp 29–31; 67–71Google Scholar
  3. Heires JT (2001) What I did last summer: a software development benchamrking case study. IEEE SoftwareGoogle Scholar
  4. McCabe T (1976) Complexity measure. IEEE Trans Software Eng 2(4):308–320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. McConnell S (1996) Rapid development—taming wild software schedules. Microsoft PressGoogle Scholar
  6. Putnam L, Myers W (1992) Measures for excellence: reliable software on time, within budget. Yourdon PressGoogle Scholar
  7. Robert EP (1992) Software size measurement: a framework for counting source statements, Technical Report CMU/SEI-92-TR-020. Software Engineering Institute, Carnegie Mellon UniversityGoogle Scholar
  8. Zuse H (1999) Software complexity—measures and methods. Walter de Gruyter, Berlin, Genthinerstr, ISBN: 3-11-015587-7Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sanjay Mohapatra
    • 1
  1. 1.Xavier Institute of ManagementBhubaneswarIndia

Personalised recommendations