Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Springer Optimization and Its Applications ((SOIA,volume 66))

  • 1819 Accesses

Abstract

It is well known that in quasi-static crack propagation under growing external loads a Griffith-like energy balance predicts no energy surplus for fracture; this result is known as the paradox of Rice. The paradox is generally attributed to the assumptions of small scale yielding and perfect plasticity of material. In this paper we show that the paradox does not lie in the assumptions of infinitesimal strain conditions, neither in the work-hardening rules. Afterwards, we investigate the stress and strain fields, ahead of the crack front in the case of large scale yielding at the crack tip, and discover that the trace of the Energy–Momentum Tensor assumes a constant value during the whole process of crack extension. When this value is assumed as a critical condition for crack growth, we obtain a curve load versus crack extension in excellent agreement with available experimental data. The Rice’s paradox is thus overcome, and a new criterion for ductile crack growth is introduced.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Binante, V.: A new energetic failure criterion and constitutive models of porous materials into the fracture process zone, in the framework of elastic–plastic fracture mechanics. Ph.D. thesis in aerospace engineering, Universitá di Pisa, Faculty of Engineering, 2010

    Google Scholar 

  2. Binante, V., Crack extension energy rate and energetic approaches in elastic–plastic fracture mechanics. In: Buttazzo, G., Frediani, A. (eds.) Variational Analysis and Aerospace Engineering II: Mathematical Challenges for Aerospace Design. Springer, Berlin (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Chiarelli, M., Frediani, A., Lucchesi, M.: On the crack extension energy rate in elastic-plastic fracture mechanics. In: Blauel, J.B., Schwalbe, K.H. (eds.) Defect Assessment in Components: Fundamentals and Applications. Mechanical Engineering Publications, London (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Chiarelli, M., Frediani, A., Lucchesi, M.: Computation of crack extension energy rate for elastic-plastic hardening materials under variable loading. Eng. Fract. Mech. 55(5), 813–830 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Eshelby, J.D.: Energy relations and the energy–momentum tensor in continuum mechanics. In: Kanninen, M.F., Adler, W.F., Rosenfield, A.R., Jaffee, R.I. (eds.) Inelastic Behaviour of Solids, vol. 43, pp. 77–115. McGraw-Hill, New York (1970)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Frediani, A.: Effects of plasticity of metallic materials on fatigue and fracture mechanics. In: Miele, A., Salvetti, A. (eds.) Applied Mathematics in Aerospace Science and Engineering. Erice, Italy, 3–10 September 1994. Mathematical Concepts and Methods in Science and Engineering, vol. 44, pp. 363–393. Plenum Press, New York (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Gu, I.: A CTOD approach to predicting crack extensions in aluminum alloys. J. Test. Eval. 27, 143–149 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Moran, B., Shih, C.F.: Crack tip and associated domain integrals from momentum and energy balance. Eng. Fract. Mech. 27(6), 615–642 (1987)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Nikishkov, G., Heerens, J., Hellmann, D.: Comparison of finite element results and experimental measurements of CTOD δ5 in CT specimens. J. Test. Eval. 27, 307–311 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Oriunno, M.: Meccanica della Frattura elasto-plastica: modelli costitutivi per lo studio del fenomeno di propagazione. Tesi di dottorato in ingegneria aeronautica, Universitá di Pisa, Facoltá di Ingegneria (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Rice, J.R.: A path independent integral and the approximate analysis of strain concentration by notches and cracks. J. Appl. Mech. 35, 379–386 (1968)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Rice, J.R.: An examination of the fracture mechanics energy balance from the point of view of continuum mechanics. In: Swedlow, J.L., Yokobori, T., Kawasaki, T. (eds.) Proceedings of the First International Conference on Fracture, vol. 1, pp. 309–340. Sendai, Japan, 12–17 September (1965)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Sumpter, J.D.G.: Energy dissipation rate analysis of a low upper shelf data set. Eng. Fract. Mech. 71(1), 39–56 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Sumpter, J.D.G.: The energy dissipation rate approach to tearing instability. Eng. Fract. Mech. 71(1), 17–37 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Sumpter, J.D.G.: Energy rates and crack stability in small scale yielding. Int. J. Fract. 130(3), 667–681 (2004)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Sun, C.T., Wang, C.Y.: A new look at energy release rate in fracture mechanics. Int. J. Fract. 113(4), 295–307 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Wilson, C., Landes, J.: Inconsistencies between CTOD and J calculations. J. Test. Eval. 22, 505–511 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vincenzo Binante .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this paper

Cite this paper

Binante, V., Frediani, A. (2012). A Criterion for Ductile Crack Growth Based on the Energy–Momentum Tensor. In: Buttazzo, G., Frediani, A. (eds) Variational Analysis and Aerospace Engineering: Mathematical Challenges for Aerospace Design. Springer Optimization and Its Applications(), vol 66. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-2435-2_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics