Skip to main content

Application of the Restoring Force Surface Method to a Real-life Spacecraft Structure

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Topics in Nonlinear Dynamics, Volume 3

Abstract

Many nonlinear system identification methods have been introduced in the technical literature during the last 30 years. However, few of these methods were applied to real-life structures. In this context, the objective of the present paper is to demonstrate that the Restoring Force Surface (RFS) method can provide a reliable identification of a nonlinear spacecraft structure. The nonlinear component comprises an inertia wheel mounted on a support, the motion of which is constrained by eight elastomer plots and mechanical stops. Several adaptations to the RFS method are proposed, which include the elimination of kinematic constraints and the regularization of ill-conditioned inverse problems. The proposed methodology is demonstrated using numerical data.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Kerschen G, Worden K, Vakakis AF, Golinval JC (2006) Past, present and future of nonlinear system identification in structural dynamics. Mech Syst Signal Process 20(3):505–592

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Leontaritis IJ, Billings SA (1985) Input–output parametric models for nonlinear systems, part I: deterministic nonlinear systems. Int J Control 41(2):303–328

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Leontaritis IJ, Billings SA (1985) Input–output parametric models for nonlinear systems, part II: stochastic nonlinear systems. Int J Control 41:329–344

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Richards CM, Singh R (1998) Identification of multi-degree-of-freedom non-linear systems under random excitations by the reverse-path spectral method. J Sound Vib 213(4):673–708

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Adams DE, Allemang RJ (2000) A frequency domain method for estimating the parameters of a non-linear structural dynamic model through feedback. Mech Syst Signal Process 14(4):637–656

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ruzzene M, Fasana A, Garibaldi L, Piombo B (1997) Natural frequencies and dampings identification using wavelet transform: application to real data. Mech Syst Signal Process 11(2):207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Masri SF, Caughey TK (1979) A nonparametric identification technique for nonlinear dynamic problems. J Appl Mech 46(2):433

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Yang Y, Ibrahim SR (1985) A nonparametric identification technique for a variety of discrete nonlinear vibrating systems. ASME J Vib Acoust Stress Reliab Des 107:60–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Duym S, Schoukens J (1995) Design of excitation signals for the restoring force surface method. Mech Syst Signal Process 9(2):139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Crawley EF, O’Donnell KJ (1986) Identification of nonlinear system parameters in joints using the force-state mapping technique. AIAA Paper

    Google Scholar 

  11. Worden K, Tomlinson GR (2001) Nonlinearity in structural dynamics: detection, identification and modelling. Taylor and Francis, Bristol and Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  12. Al-Hadid MA, Wright JR (1992) Application of the force-state mapping approach to the identification of nonlinear systems. Mech Syst Signal Process 6(4):383–401

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Worden K, Tomlinson GR (1992) Parametric and nonparametric identification of automotive shock absorbers. In: International modal analysis conference (IMAC) X, San Diego, CA, 1992

    Google Scholar 

  14. Worden K et al (2008) Nonlinear system identification of automotive dampers: a time and frequency-domain analysis. Mech Syst Signal Process 23(2009):104–126

    Google Scholar 

  15. Russell AG (2000) Thick skin, faceted, CFRP, monocoque tube structure for smallsats. In: European conference on spacecraft structures, materials and mechanical testing, Noordwijk, 2001

    Google Scholar 

  16. Camarasa P, Kiryenko S (2009) Shock attenuation system for spacecraft and adaptor (SASSA). In: European conference on spacecraft structures, materials and mechanical testing, Toulouse, France, 2009

    Google Scholar 

  17. Kerschen G, Golinval JC, Worden K (2001) Theoretical and experimental identification of a non-linear beam. J Sound Vib 244(4):597–613

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Duym SWR (1998) Nonparametric identification of nonlinear mechanical systems. PhD thesis, Vrije Universiteit Brussel

    Google Scholar 

  19. Worden K (1990) Data processing and experiment design for the restoring force surface method, part I: integration and differentiation of measured time data. Mech Syst Signal Process 4(4):295–319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Kerschen G, Lenaerts V, Golinval JC (2003) Identification of a continuous structure wth a geometrical non-linearity. Part I: conditioned reverse path. J Sound Vib 262(4):889–906

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Kerschen G, Soula L, Vergniaud JB, Newerla A (2011) Assessment of nonlinear system identification methods using the smallSat spacecraft structure. In: International modal analysis conference (IMAC) XXIX, Jacksonville, FL, 2011

    Google Scholar 

  22. Peeters M, Kerschen G, Golinval JC, Stephan C, Lubrina P (2011) Nonlinear norma modes of a full-scale aircraft. In: International modal analysis conference (IMAC) XXIX, Jacksonville, FL, 2011

    Google Scholar 

  23. Hansen PC (1996) Rank-deficient and discrete ill-posed problems. PhD thesis, Technical University of Denmark

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This paper has been prepared in the framework of the ESA Technology Research Programme study “Advancement of Mechanical Verification Methods for Non-linear Spacecraft Structures (NOLISS)” (ESA contractNo.21359/08/NL/SFe).

The author J.P. Noël would like to acknowledge the Belgian National Fund for Scientific Research (FRIA fellowship) for its financial support.

The authors finally thank Astrium SAS for sharing information about the SmallSat spacecraft.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. P. Noel .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 The Society for Experimental Mechanics, Inc. 2012

About this paper

Cite this paper

Noel, J.P., Kerschen, G., Newerla, A. (2012). Application of the Restoring Force Surface Method to a Real-life Spacecraft Structure. In: Adams, D., Kerschen, G., Carrella, A. (eds) Topics in Nonlinear Dynamics, Volume 3. Conference Proceedings of the Society for Experimental Mechanics Series. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-2416-1_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-2416-1_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-2415-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-2416-1

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics