Skip to main content

Use of Family of Models for Performance Predictions and Decision Making

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Topics on the Dynamics of Civil Structures, Volume 1

Abstract

The issue about performance prediction is the need of a well representative model which can be analytical or mathematical due to non-availability of the future data. Analytical or mathematical models can be identified with the help of current data coming from structural health monitoring (SHM) systems and these models can be used for future performance predictions by incorporating uncertainties coming from modeling and monitoring data. In this study, a well calibrated finite element model (FEM) of a real life structure, which is accepted as the parent model of the family models, is introduced. Based on this model, offspring models, which include the modeling and measurement uncertainties are generated. In the offspring generation process uncertainties such as boundary conditions, loads, geometric and mechanical properties of the elements are defined with distributions. After the generation process, offspring models are analyzed and set of results are obtained for a family of models. These results are used for structural reliability calculations in the performance prediction part of the paper. At this point, the other important considerations such as system model definition and correlation of the components for the system reliability approach are also taken into account. Finally, future performances in the case of instantaneous or continuous structural changes are considered for structural system reliability prediction, which is critical for decision making about future performance of the structure, by incorporating uncertainties from measurement through modeling on the movable bridge.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Abbreviations

C(t):

Corrosion penetration rate

A:

Statistical random variable

B:

Statistical random variable

Δ increase :

Expected 75 year maximum traffic load

μtraffic :

Mean of the current traffic load

σtraffic :

Standard deviation of the current traffic load

g:

Limit state function

εyield :

Yielding strain

εoffspring_DeadLoad :

Dead load strain coming from offspring models

εoffspring_TrafficLoad :

Traffic load strain coming from offspring models

εSHM_TrafficLoad :

Traffic load strain coming from SHM data

εSHM_TempCycle :

Temperature induced strain coming from SHM data

RTA:

River transit bus

FT:

Fire truck

EN:

East North

WS:

West South

References

  1. Sohn H et al (2001) Structural health monitoring using statistical pattern recognition techniques. J Dynam Syst Meas Control ASME 123:706–711

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Brownjohn JMW et al (2003) Assessment of highway bridge upgrading by dynamic testing and finite-element model updating. J Bridg Eng ASCE 8(3):162–172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Gul M, Catbas FN (2008) Ambient vibration data analysis for structural identification and global condition assessment. J Eng Mech 134(8):650–662

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Reich GW, Park KC (2001) A theory for strain-based structural system identification. J Appl Mech 68(4):521–527

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Sanayei M et al (2006) Damage localization and finite-element model updating using multiresponse NDT data. J Bridg Eng 11(6):688–698

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Bell ES et al (2007) Multiresponse parameter estimation for finite-element model updating using nondestructive test data. J Struct Eng 133(8):1067–1079

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ang AHS, De Leon D (2005) Modeling and analysis of uncertainties for risk-Informed decisions in infrastructures engineering. Struct Infrastruct Eng 1(1):19–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Moon FL, Aktan AE (2006) Impacts of epistemic uncertainty on structural identification of constructed systems. Shock Vib Dig 38(5):399–420

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Catbas FN, Susoy M, Frangopol DM (2008) Structural health monitoring and reliability estimation: long span truss bridge application with environmental monitoring data. Eng Struct 30(9):2347–2359

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Catbas FN, et al (2010) Long term bridge maintenance monitoring demonstration on a movable bridge. A framework for structural health monitoring of movable bridges, Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Catbas FN, et al (2011) Movable bridges: condition, modeling and damage simulations. In: Proceedings of the ICE – bridge engineering (accepted)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Albrecht P, Naeemi AH (1984) Performance of weathering steel in bridges. Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  13. Nowak AS (1999) Calibration of LRFD bridge design code. NCHRP Report 368: Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  14. Ang AH-S, Tang WH (1984) Probability concepts in engineering planning and design, IIth edn. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  15. Estes AC, Frangopol DM (1998) RELSYS: a computer program for structural system reliability analysis. J Struct Eng Mech 6(8):901–919

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The research project described in this paper is supported by the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) Contract # BD548/RPWO 23 and Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) Cooperative Agreement Award DTFH61-07-H-00040. The authors would like to thank Mr. Marcus Ansley, P.E., the Head of Structures Research at FDOT for his support and guidance throughout the project. The writers also greatly appreciate the valuable feedback provided by Mr. Alberto Sardinas at FDOT District 4, who has shared his experience. The authors would like to express their profound gratitude to Dr. Hamid Ghasemi of FHWA for his support of this research. The support of both agencies and their engineers is greatly recognized and appreciated. The authors would also like to acknowledge the following for their contributions of several other colleagues and students. The opinions, findings, and conclusions expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the sponsoring organizations.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to F. Necati Catbas .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 The Society for Experimental Mechanics, Inc. 2012

About this paper

Cite this paper

Gokce, H.B., Catbas, F.N., Frangopol, D.M. (2012). Use of Family of Models for Performance Predictions and Decision Making. In: Caicedo, J., Catbas, F., Cunha, A., Racic, V., Reynolds, P., Salyards, K. (eds) Topics on the Dynamics of Civil Structures, Volume 1. Conference Proceedings of the Society for Experimental Mechanics Series. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-2413-0_42

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-2413-0_42

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-2412-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-2413-0

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics