Skip to main content

Secondary Surgery Following Failed Forearm Reconstruction

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 1729 Accesses

Abstract

It is not uncommon for longitudinal forearm instability to be recognized quite late after the injury. Frequently, this injury is not appreciated until there have already been changes at both the wrist (ulnar carpal abutment) and the elbow (radiocapitellar abutment). These late cases frequently require an ulnar shortening osteotomy, as well as radial head prosthesis and/or reconstruction of the interosseous ligament. If continued problems result and there are degenerative changes or chronic pain at the radial capitellar joint, a radiocapitellar prosthesis can be considered. The final treatment for some patients may require creation of a one-bone forearm. This prevents any further longitudinal instability of the forearm; however, it obviously results in loss of forearm rotation. These injuries are best treated early and aggressively, as later reconstructive options will usually result in decreased function of the extremity. This chapter goes through the different reconstructive options that are available to the reoperative surgeon.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Brockman EP. Two cases of disability at the wrist joint following excision of the head of the radius. Proc R Soc Med. 1931;24:904–5.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Curr JF, Coe WA. Dislocation of the inferior radioulnar joint. Br J Surg. 1946;34:74–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Essex-Lopresti P. Fractures of the radial head with distal radio-ulnar dissociation; report of two cases. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1951;33(2):244–7.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Karlstad R, Morrey BF, Cooney WP. Failure of fresh-frozen radial head allografts in the treatment of Essex-Lopresti injury. A report of four cases. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005;87(8):1828–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Edwards Jr GS, Jupiter JB. Radial head fractures with acute distal radioulnar dislocation. Essex-Lopresti revisited. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1988;234:61–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Trousdale RT, Amadio PC, Cooney WP, et al. Radioulnar dissociation. A review of twenty cases. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1992;74(10):1486–97.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. McGinley JC, Hopgood BC, Gaughan JP, et al. Forearm and elbow injury: the influence of rotational position. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003;85:2403–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Noda K, Goto A, Murase T, et al. Interosseous membrane of the forearm: an anatomical study of ligament attachment locations. J Hand Surg Am. 2009;34A:415–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Skahen 3rd JR, Palmer AK, Werner FW, et al. The interosseous membrane of the forearm: anatomy and function. J Hand Surg Am. 1997;22(6):981–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. McGinley JC, Kozin SH. Interosseous membrane anatomy and functional mechanics. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001;383:108–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Hotchkiss RN, An KN, Sowa DT, et al. An anatomic and mechanical study of the interosseous membrane of the forearm: pathomechanics of proximal migration of the radius. J Hand Surg Am. 1989;14(2 Pt 1):256–61.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Rabinowitz RS, Light TR, Harvey RM, et al. The role of the interosseous membrane and triangular fibrocartilage complex in forearm stability. J Hand Surg Am. 1994;19(3):385–93.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Manson TT, Pfaeffle HJ, Herdon JH, et al. Forearm rotation alters interosseous ligament strain distribution. J Hand Surg Am. 2000;25(6):1058–63.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Fester EW, Murray PM, Sanders TG, et al. The efficacy of magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasound in detecting disruptions of the forearm interosseous membrane: a cadaver study. J Hand Surg Am. 2002;27(3):418–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Chandler JW, Stabile KJ, Pfaeffle HJ, et al. Anatomic parameters for planning of interosseous ligament reconstruction using ­computer assisted techniques. J Hand Surg Am. 2003;28(1):111–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Marcotte AL, Osterman AL. Longitudinal radioulnar dissociation: identification and treatment of acute and chronic injuries. Hand Clin. 2007;23:195–208.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Martin BF. The oblique cord of the forearm. J Anat. 1958;92:609–15.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Tubbs RS, O’Neil Jr JT, Key CD, Zarzour JG, Fulghum SB, Kim EJ, et al. The oblique cord of the forearm in man. Clin Anat. 2007;20:411–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Patel BA. Form and function of the oblique cord (chorda obliqua) in anthropoid primates. Primates. 2005;46:47–57.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Forster A. Uber den morphologischen Wert der Chorda oblique antebrachii anterior und der Chorda oblique antebrachii posterior. Z Morphol Anthropol. 1905;8:62–79.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Watanabe H, Berger RA, Berglund LJ, Zobitz ME, An KN. Contribution of the interosseous membrane to distal radioulnar joint constraint. J Hand Surg Am. 2005;30A:1164–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Kihara H, Short WH, Werner FW, Fortino MD, Palmer AK. The stabilizing mechanism of the distal radioulnar joint during pronation and supination. J Hand Surg Am. 1995;20A:930–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Skahen 3rd JR, Palmer AK, Werner FW, et al. Reconstruction of the interosseous membrane of the forearm in cadavers. J Hand Surg Am. 1997;22(6):986–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Palmer AK, Werner FW. Biomechanics of the distal radioulnar joint. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1984;187:26–35.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Birbeck DP, Failla JM, Hoshaw SJ, et al. The interosseous membrane affects load distribution in the forearm. J Hand Surg Am. 1997;22(6):975–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Halls AA, Travill A. Transmission of pressures across the elbow joint. Anat Rec. 1964;150:243–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Coleman DA, Blair WF, Shurr D. Resection of the radial head for fracture of the radial head. Long term follow up of seventeen cases. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1987;69(3):385–92.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Goldberg I, Peylan J, Yosipovitch Z. Late results of excision of the radial head for an isolated closed fracture. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1986;68(5):675–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Stephen IB. Excision of the radial head for closed fracture. Acta Orthop Scand. 1981;52(4):409–12.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Morrey BF, Chao EY, Hui FC. Biomechanical study of the elbow following excision of the radial head. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1979;61(1):63–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Radin EL, Riseborough EJ. Fractures of the radial head. A review of eighty-eight cases and analysis of the indications for excision of the radial head and non-operative treatment. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1966;48(6):1055–64.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. McDougall A, White J. Subluxation of the inferior radio-ulnar joint complicating fracture of the radial head. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1957;39(2):278–87.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Pfaeffle HJ, Fischer KJ, Manson TT, et al. Role of the forearm interosseous ligament: is it more than just longitudinal load transfer? J Hand Surg Am. 2000;25(4):683–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Swanson AB, Jaeger SH, La Rochelle D. Comminuted fractures of the radial head. The role of silicone-implant replacement arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1981;63(7):1039–49.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Starch DW, Dabezies EJ. Magnetic resonance imaging of the interosseous membrane of the forearm. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2001;83(2):235–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Failla JM, Jacobson J, van Holsbeeck M. Ultrasound diagnosis and surgical pathology of the torn interosseous membrane in forearm fractures/dislocations. J Hand Surg Am. 1999;24(2):257–66.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Smith AM, Urbanosky LR, Castle JA, et al. Radius pull test: predictor of longitudinal forearm instability. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2002;84(11):1970–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Geel CW, Palmer AK. Radial head fractures and their effect on the distal radioulnar joint. A rationale for treatment. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1992;275:79–84.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Harman TW, Graham TJ, Bamberger HB. Contemporary management of fractures of the radial head and neck with implant arthroplasty. Curr Opin Orthop. 2005;16:285–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Tejwani SG, Markolf KL, Benhaim P. Reconstruction of the interosseous membrane of the forearm with a graft substitute: a cadaveric study. J Hand Surg Am. 2005;30(2):326–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Sellman DC, Seitz Jr WH, Postak PD, et al. Reconstructive strategies for radioulnar dissociation: a biomechanical study. J Orthop Trauma. 1995;6:516–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Skahen 3rd JR, Palmer AK, Werner FW, et al. Reconstruction of the interosseous membrane of the forearm in cadavers. J Hand Surg Am. 1997;22A:986–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Ruch DS, Change DS, Koman LA. Reconstruction of longitudinal stability of the forearm after disruption of interosseous ligament and radial head excision (Essex-Lopresti lesion). J South Orthop Assoc. 1999;8:47–52.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Chloros GD, Wiesler ER, Ruch DS, Kuzma GR, et al. Reconstruction of Essex-Lopresti injury of the forearm: technical note. J Hand Surg Am. 2008;33A:124–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Skahen 3rd JR, Palmer AK, Werner FW, et al. Reconstruction of the interosseous membrane of the forearm in cadavers. J Hand Surg Am. 1997;22(6):986–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Pfaeffle HJ, Stabile KJ, Li ZM, et al. Reconstruction of the interosseous ligament restores normal forearm compressive load transfer in cadavers. J Hand Surg Am. 2005;30(2):319–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Tomaino MM, Pfaeffle J, Stabile K, et al. Reconstruction of the interosseous ligament of the forearm reduces load on the radial head in cadavers. J Hand Surg Br. 2003;28(3):267–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Sellman DC, Seitz Jr WH, Postak PD, et al. Reconstructive strategies for radioulnar dissociation: a biomechanical study. J Orthop Trauma. 1995;9(6):516–22.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Hey-Groves EW. Modern methods of treating fractures. 2nd ed. Bristol: John Wright and sons; 1921. p. 320.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Chen F, Culp RW, Schneider LH, Osterman AL. Revision of the ununited one bone forearm. J Hand Surg Am. 1998;23(6):1091–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Peterson CA, Maki S, Wood MB. Clinical results of the one-bone forearm. J Hand Surg Am. 1998;23(6):1091–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Allende C, Allende BT. Posttraumatic one bone forearm reconstruction. A report of seven cases. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004;86(2):364–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Murray PM. Free vascularized bone transfer in limb salvage surgery of the upper extremity. Hand Clin. 2004;20:203–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Dell PC, Sheppard JE. Vascularized bone grafts in the treatment of infected forearm nonunions. J Hand Surg Am. 1984;9(5):653–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Duffy GP, Wood MB, Rock MG, et al. Vascularized free fibula transfer combined with autografting for the management of fracture nonunions associated with radiation therapy. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2000;82(4):544–54.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Taylor GI, Miller GD, Ham FJ. The free vascularized bone graft. A clinical extension of microvascular techniques. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1975;55(5):533–44.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Taylor GI. Microvascular free bone transfer. Orthop Clin North Am. 1977;8:425–47.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Taylor GI, Townsend P, Corlett R. Superiority of the deep circumflex iliac vessels as a supply for free groin flaps: clinical study. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1979;64:745.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. Weiland AJ, Moore JR, Daniel RK. Vascularized bone autografts: experience with 41 cases. Clin Orthop. 1983;174:87.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Sempuku T, Tamai S, Mizumoto S, Yajima H. Vascularized tail bone grafts in rats. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1993;91(3):502–10.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. Phemister DB. The fate of transplanted bone and regenerative powers of its various constituents. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1914;19:303–33.

    Google Scholar 

  62. Cutting CB, McCarthy JG. Comparison of residual osseous mass between vascularized and nonvascularized onlay bone transfers. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1983;72(5):672–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. Weiland AJ. Current concepts review vascularized free bone transplants. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1981;63(1):166–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  64. de Boer HH, Wood MB. Bone changes in the vascularized fibular graft. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1989;71(3):374–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Han CS, Wood MB, Bishop AT, Cooney III WP. Vascularized bone transfer. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1992;74(10):1441–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  66. Enneking WF, Eady JL, Burchardt H. Autogenous cortical bone grafts in the reconstruction of segmental skeletal defects. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1980;62(7):1039–58.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  67. Mankin HJ, Gebhardt MC, Tomford WW. The use of frozen cadaveric allografts in the management of patients with bone tumors of the extremities. Orthop Clin North Am. 1987;18(2):275–89.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  68. Hsu RW, Wood MB, Sim FH, Chao EY. Free vascularized fibular grafting for reconstruction after tumor resection. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1997;70(1):36–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Shea KG, Coleman DA, Scott SM, et al. Microvascularized free fibula grafts for reconstruction of skeletal defects after tumor resection. J Pediatr Orthop. 1997;17(4):424–32.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  70. Davis PK, Mazur JM, Coleman GN. A torsional strength comparison of vascularized and nonvascularized bone grafts. J Biomech. 1982;15(11):875–80.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  71. Gao YH, Ketch LL, et al. Upper limb salvage with microvascular bone transfer for major long-bone segmental tumor resections. Ann Plast Surg. 2001;47:240–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  72. Weiland AJ, Kleinert HE, Kutz J, Daniel RK. Free vascularized bone graft in surgery of the upper extremity. J Hand Surg Am. 1979;4A:129–44.

    Google Scholar 

  73. Gerwin M, Weiland AJ. Vascularized bone grafts to the upper extremity: indications and technique. Microsurgery. 1992;8:509.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  74. Yijima H, Tamai S, Ono H, Kizaki K. Vascularized bone grafts to the upper extremities. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1998;101:727.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  75. Tang C. Reconstruction of the bones and joints of the upper extremity by vascularized free fibula graft: a report of 46 cases. J Reconstr Microsurg. 1992;8:285.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  76. Taylor GI, Wilson KR, Rees MD, et al. The anterior tibial vessels and their role in epiphyseal and diaphyseal transfer of the fibula: experimental study and clinical applications. Br J Plast Surg. 1988;41:451.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  77. Pho RWH. Free vascularized fibula transplantation for replacement of lower radius. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1979;61B:362.

    Google Scholar 

  78. Tsai T, Ludwig L, Tonkin M. Vascularized fibula epiphyseal transfer: a clinical study. Clin Orthop. 1986;210:228.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. Beppu M, Hanel DP, Johnston GHF, Carmo JM, Tsai TM. The osteocutaneous fibula flap: an anatomic study. J Reconstr Microsurg. 1992;8(3):215–23.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  80. Ihara K, Doi K, Yamamoto M, et al. Free vascularized fibular grafts for large bone defects in the extremities after tumor excision. J Reconstr Microsurg. 1998;14(6):371–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  81. Minanmi A, Kasashima T, Iwasaki N, et al. Vascularized fibula grafts. An experience of 102 patients. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2000;82(7):1022–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  82. Ceruso M, Falcone C, Innocenti M, et al. Skeletal reconstruction with a free vascularized fibula graft associated to bone allograft after resection of malignant bone tumor of limbs. Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir. 2001;33(4):277–82.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  83. Youdas JW, Wood MB, Cahalan TD, et al. A quantitative analysis of donor site morbidity after vascularized fibula transfer. J Orthop Res. 1988;6(5):621–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  84. Shpitzer T, Neligan P, Boyd B, et al. Leg morbidity and function following fibular free flap harvest. Ann Plast Surg. 1997;38(5):460–4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  85. Babovic S, Johnson CH, Finical SJ. Free fibula donor site morbidity: the Mayo experience with 100 consecutive harvests. J Reconstr Microsurg. 2000;16(2):107–10.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  86. Vail TP, Urbaniak JR. Donor site morbidity with use of vascularized autogenous fibular grafts. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1996;78(2):204–11.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  87. Bodde EW, de Visser E, Duysens JE, et al. Donor site morbidity after free vascularized autogenous fibular transfer: subjective and quantitative analysis. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2003;111(7):2237–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  88. Kellam JF, Jupiter JB. Diaphyseal fractures of the forearm. In: Browner BD, Jupiter JB, Levine AM, Trafton PG, editors. Skeletal trauma. 1st ed. Philadelphia: Saunders; 1992. p. 1095–122.

    Google Scholar 

  89. Parikh SN. Bone graft substitutes: past, present, future. J Postgrad Med. 2002;48:142.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  90. Geesink RGT, Hoefnagels NHM, Bulstra SK. Osteogenic activity of OP-1 bone morphogenetic protein (BMP-7) in a human fibular defect. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1999;81:710–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  91. Boden SD, Zdeblick TA, Sandhu HS, Heim SE. The use of rhBMP-2 in interbody fusion cages. Spine. 2000;25:376–81.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  92. Morrey BF, Schneeberger AG. Anconeus arthroplasty: a new ­technique for reconstruction of the radiocapitellar and/or proximal radioulnar joint. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2002;84:1960–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Lee Osterman MD .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendices

Case 24.1

figure a_24

(a and b) Initial presentation—28-year-old male with flail right arm due to infected nonunion of compound fractures of both radius and ulna (s/p multiple operations including sequestrectomies of the infected nonunions).

figure b_24

(c) Initially underwent segmental bone resection (2.5 cm of radius and 7.5 cm of ulna) and interposition of antibiotic-impregnated bone cement.

figure c_24

(d) Four weeks later, removal of external fixator and open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of long bones with iliac crest bone graft (ICBG). Four weeks after ORIF, presented with draining osteomyelitis of ulna and excision of ICBG to ulna, removal of plate, insertion of tobramycin cement, and replating of the large ulnar defect. One week later, bone cement was trimmed leaving a cylinder the same diameter as the ulna plus a bridge of cancellous bone graft from the iliac crest. Two months later, presented again with purulent drainage from ulna. Therefore underwent removal of ulnar plate and second cancellous bone grafting (from iliac crest) to ulna, held in place by the periosteal envelope. The radius was healing.

figure d_24

(e) Despite multiple debridements, antibiotics, and bone grafting, chronic symptomatic osteomyelitis of ulna persisted. Therefore, partial excision of ulna and free vascularized osteocutaneous fibular graft to the ulna was performed.

figure e_24

(f) The cortices of the overlapping ulnar stump and fibular graft are taken down to promote union. However, as good apposition of these surfaces was not achieved with screw fixation, as seen in this radiograph, fibrous nonunion ­persisted. Subsequently, this fibrous nonunion was excised with placement of ICBG and AO plating. Five months later, satisfactory union was achieved, as seen in the radiographs below.

Case 24.2

figure f_24

(a) Initial presentation—68-year-old male presenting with wound over ulna in proximal forearm (h/o soft tissue sarcoma in same region resected, followed by resection of recurrences  ×  2 and intraoperative radiation). Radiographs (X-ray and MRI) showed osteonecrosis and chronic osteomyelitis.

figure g_24

(b) Initial operation—excision of ulceration and 12 cm of infected ulnar bone. Placement of antibiotic-impregnated bone cement and external fixator followed by gracilis myocutaneous flap and split thickness skin graft.

figure h_24

(c) Two months later, external fixator and bone cement were removed. Vascularized osteocutaneous free fibula flap was performed. Because of recent irradiation to forearm, brachial artery and basilic vein outside field of irradiation were ­chosen as recipient vessels. The fibula is measured and its middle third is identified. Fasciocutaneous perforators from the peroneal artery supply the skin at intervals, especially along middle third of the fibula.

figure i_24

(d) Lateral and anterior compartment muscles are freed from fibula, protecting both deep and superficial branches of peroneal nerve. The interosseous membrane is exposed and divided. The distal fibula is exposed and cut 7–8 cm above the lateral malleolus. The proximal fibular cut is also made, protecting the peroneal nerve and vessels.

figure j_24

(e) The peroneal vessels are visualized and ligated distally. The flexor hallucis longus (FHL) muscle is separated from the fibula. Next, the tibialis posterior (TP) muscle is ­separated from the fibula. A cuff of FHL and TP muscle may be left around the vessels, to protect them.

figure k_24

(f) The osteocutaneous fibula flap is left attached by the proximal peroneal vessels, while the tourniquet is let down and the flap is allowed to perfuse for 30 min prior to harvest. Below—the free osteocutaneous fibular flap. Saphenous vein is harvested to be used as vein graft connecting the peroneal artery and vein to the brachial artery and vein, respectively. Below—completed anastomosis. Osteocutaneous fibular graft in place. The fibular graft overlaps the proximal and distal ulnar stumps (see radiographs below). The overlapping apposing cortices are taken down and fixed rigidly with two AO screws each, to promote union.

figure l_24

(g) Immediately postoperative—osteocutaneous fibular flap in place with well-perfused skin paddle. Postoperative day 2—venous congestion and hematoma under the skin paddle was noted. Patient was taken back to operating room, hematoma was evacuated, and a thrombosed venous anastomosis was taken down and repaired. The arterial anastomosis was intact. Postoperative day 3—patient suffered hypotension, was transferred to ICU, and was diagnosed with pneumonia. The flap died.

figure m_24

(h) Postoperative day 4—patient was stabilized and taken to OR. Soft tissue and periosteum beneath the skin paddle were found to be devoid of blood supply. The peroneal vessels were found to be thrombosed and were ligated. All soft tissue was stripped off the fibular graft which was left in situ to be incorporated as a nonvascularized bone graft. The proximal two AO screws were found to be broken. These were removed and interosseous wire times three was used to hold the fibular graft proximally. The skin was easily apposed, even after excision of the skin paddle.

figure n_24

(i) Eight months postoperatively, union has not been achieved. One year postoperatively, radiographs reveal proximal and distal union of the fibular graft.

Case 24.3

figure o_24

(a) Initial presentation—43-year-old female with 1 year of wrist pain. Radiograph—lytic lesion in distal radius. CT—erosion of dorsal cortex of radius by tumor. Biopsy revealed giant cell tumor.

Resection of giant cell tumor of distal radius included:

  • Ellipse of skin enclosing biopsy site tract

  • Contents of first extensor compartment

  • Half of second extensor compartment

  • Distal brachioradialis

  • 6 cm of distal radius

Intraoperative frozen section of soft tissue margins was negative for tumor. The fibula is measured and its middle third is identified.

Note—radical excision of giant cell tumors as performed above is controversial. Some authors advise less radical operations, such as enucleation of the tumor and cancellous bone grafting.

figure p_24

(b) An osteocutaneous vascularized fibula flap is harvested with peroneal artery and its venae comitantes. Two long toe extensors are harvested to reconstruct the first and second extensor compartments in the wrist. A step cut was made in the proximal radius to accept to accept the fibular bone graft. The dorsal cortices of the scaphoid and lunate were removed in a block fashion to accept the fibula. The ends of the fibula were cut to match the osteotomies of the radius proximally and ­scaphoid and lunate distally. Proximal fixation was with three 2.7-mm AO screws. Distal fixation was with two 0.062-in. Kirschner wires passed across the fibula into the carpal bones. Postoperative X-rays revealed union in 3 months. However, the ulna was subluxed dorsally and was of positive variance. Patient presented with instability of her distal ulna with pain and laxity. Subsequently, a modified Darrach with ECU stabilization was performed, as seen in radiographs below.

figure q_24

(c) Wrist motion at 1 year postoperatively.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Jacob, S., Tsai, TM., Osterman, A.L. (2012). Secondary Surgery Following Failed Forearm Reconstruction. In: Duncan, S. (eds) Reoperative Hand Surgery. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-2373-7_24

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-2373-7_24

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-2372-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-2373-7

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics