Abstract
Up to this point, our focus has been on studies that examined the possible ways to increase student contribution in peer facilitated online discussion environments. However, another question that should also be asked is what makes an online discussion sustainable. The social constructivist learning perspective suggests that individuals learn by exchanging ideas or opinions with one another. For this to take place, sustained online discussion, typically characterized by long threads, should ideally be the norm because it typically takes many exchanges of postings for students to share viewpoints, explore different perspectives, negotiate issues, and create mutual understandings. This chapter presents three studies that examined how threads grow. The first study examined thread development patterns, while the other two studies examined, in greater detail, the role of questions as well as other facilitation techniques that could foster the continuity of threaded discussion. We discuss six major lessons learned from these three studies.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Chan, C. C., Hew, K. F., & Cheung, W. S. (2009). Asynchronous online discussion thread development: Examining growth patterns and peer-facilitation techniques. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 25(5), 438–452.
Hewitt, J. (2005). Toward an understanding of how threads die in asynchronous computer conferences. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 14(4), 567–589.
Guzdial, M., & Turns, J. (2000). Effective discussion through a computer-mediated anchored forum. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 9(4), 437–469.
Hew, K. F., & Cheung, W. S. (2008). Attracting student participation in asynchronous online discussions: A case study of peer facilitation. Computers & Education, 51, 1111–1124.
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.
Ng, C. S. L., Cheung, W. S., & Hew, K. F. (2009). Sustaining asynchronous online discussions: Contributing factors and peer facilitation techniques. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 41(4), 477–511.
Wasko, M. M., & Faraj, S. (2000). “It is what one does:” Why people participate and help others in electronic communities of practice. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 9, 155–173.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media, New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hew, K.F., Cheung, W.S. (2012). Case Studies on Peer Facilitation: How to Sustain Participants’ Online Discussion?. In: Student Participation in Online Discussions. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-2370-6_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-2370-6_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-2369-0
Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-2370-6
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)