Skip to main content

16. Robotics in Laparoscopic and Thoracoscopic Surgery

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The SAGES Manual

Abstract

Advanced technology used in modern surgery includes telerobotic and robotic surgical instrumentation. The device currently used for most general surgical, and thoracic procedures (daVinci, Intuitive Surgical Sunnyvale, CA, USA) is more precisely defined as a telerobotic computer-assisted telemanipulator. Current clinical applications include image-guided robotic surgeries and computer enhanced robotic telesurgery. Operative procedures include a wide variety of cardiac procedures that can be accomplished without open sternotomy or thoracotomy. Most general surgical procedures have demonstrated some feasibility using robotic devices, although few have demonstrated superiority when compared to standard laparoscopic procedures. Selected procedures may show benefit such as esophagomyotomy. Urology and gynecology have seen significant growth in computer assisted surgery for the last decade as well as noncardiac thoracic procedures. There are limitations that will continue to slow the adoption of computer assisted surgery in general surgery; however, many examples of emerging technology are in place that will allow us to increase the use of technology to enhance patient outcomes. Ongoing evaluation of this technology is important in order that it be applied appropriately. This chapter gives an overview and introduction to these emerging technologies and their applications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Selected References

  • Aiono S, Gilbert JM, Soin B, Finlay PA, Gordan A. Controlled trial of the introduction of a robotic camera assistant (EndoAssist) for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc. 2002;16:1267–70.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cadeddu JA, Stoianovici D, Chen RN, Moore RG, Kavoussi LR. Stereotactic mechanical percutaneous renal access. J Endourol. 1998;12:121–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Davies B. A review of robotics in surgery. Proc Inst Mech Eng. 2000;214(H):129–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galvani CA, Gorodner MV, Moser F, Jacobsen G, Chretien C, Espat NJ, Donahue P, Horgan S. Robotically assisted laparoscopic transhiatal esophagectomy. Surg Endosc. 2008;22(4):1139–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lavallee S, Brunie L, Mazier B, et al. Image guided operating robot: a clinical application in stereotactic surgery. In: Taylor R, et al., editors. Computer integrated surgery. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 1996;77–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luketich JD, Fernardo HC, Buanaventura PO, Christie NA, Grondin SC, Schauer PR. Results of a randomized trial of HERMES-assisted vs non-HERMES-assisted laparoscopic antireflux surgery. Surg Endosc. 2002;16:1264–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Massamune K, Kobayashi E, Masutani Y, et al. Development of an MRI-compatible needle insertion manipulator for stereotactic neurosurgery. J Image Guid Surg. 1995;1:242–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Melvin WS, Dundon JM, Talamini MA, Horgan S. Computer enhanced robotic telesurgery reduces esophageal perforation during Heller myotomy. Surgery. 2005;138(4):553–8; discussion 558–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Melvin WS, Needleman JB, Krause RK, Schneider C, Ellisson EC. Computer-enhanced vs. standard laparoscopic antireflux surgery. J Gastroint Surg. 2002;6:11–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prasad SM, Ducko CT, Stephenson ER, Chambers CE, Ralph J. Prospective clinical trial of robotically assisted endoscopic coronary grafting with 1-year follow-up. Ann Surg. 2001;233(6):725–32.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rovetta A, Sala R. Robotics and telerobotics applied to a prostate biopsy on a human patient. In: Proceedings of the second international symposium on medical robotics and computer–assisted surgery, Baltimore, 2000. p. 104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Talamini M, Chapman W, Melvin S, Horgan S. A prospective analysis of 211 robotic assisted surgical procedures. Surg Endosc. 2002;16 Suppl 1:S205.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weinstein GS, O’Malley Jr BW, Cohen MA, Quon H. Transoral robotic surgery for advanced oropharyngeal carcinoma. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2010;136(11):1079–85.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Weissenbacher A, Bodner J. Robotic surgery of the mediastinum. Thorac Surg Clin 2010;20(2):331–9.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to W. Scott Melvin M.D., F.A.C.S. .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Melvin, W.S., Kirakopolous, A. (2012). 16. Robotics in Laparoscopic and Thoracoscopic Surgery. In: Soper, N., Scott-Conner, C. (eds) The SAGES Manual. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-2344-7_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-2344-7_16

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-2343-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-2344-7

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics