Reconsidering Fieldwork, an Introduction: Confronting Tensions in Fieldwork and Theory

  • Hannah Cobb
  • Oliver J. T. Harris
  • Cara Jones
  • Philip Richardson
Chapter

Abstract

The boat returns to its noost providing a spectacular view of the croft. All is in order, ready for the coming winter, the peat is cut and the animals graze by the shore. The house stands on a small knoll overlooking the sea at Tobha Beag. A warm light flickers in one of its narrow windows and smoke drifts across the bay from its chimney. A stone outhouse lies within the well maintained vegetable plot and a lambing pen stands empty, awaiting the coming spring.

Keywords

Europe Silt Smoke Microbe Excavation 

References

  1. Alberti, B., and Bray, T.L., (editors), 2009. Animating archaeology: of subjects, objects and alternative ontologies. Cambridge Archaeological Journal 19(3), special section.Google Scholar
  2. Aldred, O., 2002. Historic Landscape Characterization: Taking Stock of Methodology. English Heritage, London.Google Scholar
  3. Cochrane, A. 2007. We have never been material. Journal of Iberian Archaeology 9/10:138–57.Google Scholar
  4. Conneller, C., 2011. An Archaeology of Materials: Substantial Transformations in Early Prehistoric Europe. Routledge, London.Google Scholar
  5. Edgeworth, M., (editor) 2006. Ethnographies of Archaeological Practice: Cultural Encounters, Material Transformations. Altimira Press, Lanham, MD.Google Scholar
  6. English Heritage., 2007. Understanding the Archaeology of Landscapes: a Guide to Good Recording practices. English Heritage, London.Google Scholar
  7. Hallowell, A.I., 1960. Ojibwa ontology, behaviour and world view. In Culture in history: Essays in Honour of Paul Radin, edited by S. Diamond, pp. 19–52. Columbia University Press, New York, NY.Google Scholar
  8. Harman, G., 2009. Prince of Networks: Bruno Latour and Metaphysics. Re.Press, Melbourne.Google Scholar
  9. Hodder, I., 1997. Always momentary, fluid and flexible: towards a reflexive excavation methodology. Antiquity 71:691–700.Google Scholar
  10. Hodder, I., (editor) 2000. Towards reflexive method in archaeology: the example at Çatalhöyük: by members of the Çatalhöyük team. McDonald Institute, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  11. Ingold, T., 2000. Perceptions of the Environment: Essays in Livelihood, Dwelling and Skill. Routledge, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Johnson M., Cressey, M., and Richardson, P., 2007. Coastal Zone Assessment of Parts of the Western Isles (South Islands). Project 4 - North Uist (east coast). Unpublished Report No. 1262. CFA-Archaeology, Edinburgh.Google Scholar
  13. Latour, B., 1999. Pandora’s Hope: Essays on the Reality of Science Studies. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (MA).Google Scholar
  14. Lucas, G., 2001. Critical Approaches to Field Archaeology. Contemporary and Historical Archaeological Practice. Routledge, London.Google Scholar
  15. Lucas, G., 2005. The Archaeology of Time. Routledge, London.Google Scholar
  16. McGuire, R., 1992. A Marxist Archaeology. Academic Press, Orlando.Google Scholar
  17. McGuire, R., 1998. A dialectical epistemology for archaeology. In Theory and Practice of Archaeological Research Volume III: Dialogue with the Data: the Archaeology of Complex Societies and its Context in the 90s, edited by W. Hensel, S. Tabczyński and P. Urbańczyk, pp. 139–58. Scientia, Warsaw.Google Scholar
  18. Miller, D., 2005. Materiality: an introduction. In Materiality, edited by D. Miller, pp. 1–50. Duke University Press, London.Google Scholar
  19. Olivier, L., 2001. Duration, memory and the nature of the archaeological record. In It’s About Time. The Concept of Time in Archaeology, edited by H. Karlsson, pp. 60–71. Bricoleur Press, Göteborg.Google Scholar
  20. Olsen. B., 2010. In Defense of Things: Archaeology and the Ontology of Objects. Altamira Press, Plymouth.Google Scholar
  21. Russell, I., (editor) 2006. Images, Representations and Heritage: Moving Beyond a Modern Approach to Archaeology. Springer-Kluwer, New York (NY).Google Scholar
  22. Shanks, M., and McGuire, R., 1996. The craft of archaeology. American Antiquity, 61:75–88.Google Scholar
  23. Shanks, M., and Tilley, C., 1987. Reconstructing Archaeology. Routledge, London.Google Scholar
  24. Thomas, J., 2004. Archaeology and Modernity. Routledge, London.Google Scholar
  25. Trigger, B., 2006. A History of Archaeological Thought. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  26. Viveiros De Castro, E., 1998. Cosmological Deixis and Amerindian Perspectivism, Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 4:469–488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Vilaça, a., 2005. Chronically unstable bodies: reflections on Amazonian corporalities. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 11:445–464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Webmoor, T., and Witmore, C.L., 2008. Things are Us! A Commentary on Human/Things Relations under the Banner of a ‘Social’ Archaeology. Norwegian Archaeology Review 41(1):53–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Willerslev, R. 2007. Soul Hunters: Hunting, Animism and Personhood among the Siberian Yukaghirs. University of California Press, Berkeley (CA).Google Scholar
  30. Witmore, C.L., 2006. Vision, media, noise and the percolation of time: symmetrical approaches to the mediation of the material world. Journal of Material Culture 11(3):267–292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Witmore, C.L., 2007. Symmetrical archaeology: excerpts of a manifesto. World Archaeology 39(4):546–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Yarrow, T., 2003. Artefactual Persons: the relational capacities of persons and things in the practice of excavation. Norwegian Archaeological Review 36:65–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Yarrow, T., 2008. In context: meaning, materiality and agency in the process of archaeological recording. In Material Agency, edited by C. Knappett and L. Malafouris, pp. 121–37. Springer, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hannah Cobb
    • 1
  • Oliver J. T. Harris
    • 2
  • Cara Jones
    • 3
  • Philip Richardson
    • 3
  1. 1.Archaeology, School of Arts Histories and CulturesUniversity of ManchesterManchesterUK
  2. 2.School of Archaeology and Ancient HistoryUniversity of LeicesterLeicesterUK
  3. 3.Archaeology ScotlandMusselburghUK

Personalised recommendations