Abstract
The defining properties of ESCs are the ability to proliferate indefinitely without commitment to any cell lineages (self-renewal) and the capacity to differentiate into cell lineages from three germ layers (pluripotency). ESCs were the first pluripotent cells isolated from normal embryos derived from the inner cell mass (ICM) of preimplantation embryos. Mouse ESCs (mESCs) contribute cells to the three germ layers and to the germline of chimeric animals when injected into mouse blastocysts. However, there are distinguishing molecular and biological characteristics between ESCs and their in vivo counterparts of the ICM. Cells of the ICM do not self-renew, and they have globally hypomethylated genome, whereas, ESCs have unlimited proliferation potential and they have characteristically highly methylated genome.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Avilion AA et al (2003) Multipotent cell lineages in early mouse development depend on SOX2 function. Genes Dev 17(1):126–140
Bao S et al (2009) Epigenetic reversion of post-implantation epiblast to pluripotent embryonic stem cells. Nature 461(7268):1292–1295
Brons IG et al (2007) Derivation of pluripotent epiblast stem cells from mammalian embryos. Nature 448(7150):191–195
Chambers I, Tomlinson SR (2009) The transcriptional foundation of pluripotency. Development 136(14):2311–2322
Chou YF et al (2008) The growth factor environment defines distinct pluripotent ground states in novel blastocyst-derived stem cells. Cell 135(3):449–461
Evans MJ, Kaufman MH (1981) Establishment in culture of pluripotential cells from mouse embryos. Nature 292(5819):154–156
Guan K et al (2006) Pluripotency of spermatogonial stem cells from adult mouse testis. Nature 440(7088):1199–1203
Guo G et al (2009) Klf4 reverts developmentally programmed restriction of ground state pluripotency. Development 136(7):1063–1069
Hanna J et al (2010a) Human embryonic stem cells with biological and epigenetic characteristics similar to those of mouse ESCs. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 107(20):9222–9227
Hanna J et al (2010b) Human embryonic stem cells with biological and epigenetic characteristics similar to those of mouse ESCs. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 107(20):9222–9227
James D et al (2005) TGFbeta/activin/nodal signaling is necessary for the maintenance of pluripotency in human embryonic stem cells. Development 132(6):1273–1282
Kanatsu-Shinohara M et al (2004) Generation of pluripotent stem cells from neonatal mouse testis. Cell 119(7):1001–1012
Lengner CJ et al (2010) Derivation of pre-X inactivation human embryonic stem cells under physiological oxygen concentrations. Cell 141(5):872–883
Matsui Y et al (1992) Derivation of pluripotential embryonic stem cells from murine primordial germ cells in culture. Cell 70(5):841–847
Meissner A et al (2008) Genome-scale DNA methylation maps of pluripotent and differentiated cells. Nature 454(7205):766–770
Nagy A et al (1990) Embryonic stem cells alone are able to support fetal development in the mouse. Development 110(3):815–821
Najm FJ et al (2011) Isolation of epiblast stem cells from preimplantation mouse embryos. Cell Stem Cell 8(3):318–325
Nichols J, Smith A (2009) Naive and primed pluripotent states. Cell Stem Cell 4(6):487–492
Nichols J et al (1998) Formation of pluripotent stem cells in the mammalian embryo depends on the POU transcription factor Oct4. Cell 95(3):379–391
Niwa H et al (2000) Quantitative expression of Oct-3/4 defines differentiation, dedifferentiation or self-renewal of ES cells. Nat Genet 24(4):372–376
Santos F et al (2002) Dynamic reprogramming of DNA methylation in the early mouse embryo. Dev Biol 241(1):172–182
Silva J, Smith A (2008) Capturing pluripotency. Cell 132(4):532–536
Surani MA (1999) Reprogramming a somatic nucleus by trans-modification activity in germ cells. Semin Cell Dev Biol 10(3):273–277
Tesar PJ et al (2007) New cell lines from mouse epiblast share defining features with human embryonic stem cells. Nature 448(7150):196–199
Theunissen TW, Silva JC (2011) Switching on pluripotency: a perspective on the biological requirement of Nanog. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 366(1575):2222–2229
Thomson JA et al (1998) Embryonic stem cell lines derived from human blastocysts. Science 282(5391):1145–1147
Wilmut I et al (2011) The evolving biology of cell reprogramming. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 366(1575):2183–2197
Ying QL et al (2003) BMP induction of Id proteins suppresses differentiation and sustains embryonic stem cell self-renewal in collaboration with STAT3. Cell 115(3):281–292
Ying QL et al (2008) The ground state of embryonic stem cell self-renewal. Nature 453(7194):519–523
Young RA (2011) Control of the embryonic stem cell state. Cell 144(6):940–954
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Yildirim, S. (2012). Pluripotent Cells. In: Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells. SpringerBriefs in Stem Cells. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-2206-8_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-2206-8_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-2205-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-2206-8
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)