Advertisement

The Global Challenge of Genomics Education: A Path to the Future

  • David L. Haury
  • Ross H. Nehm
Chapter
Part of the Advances in Microbial Ecology book series (AMIE)

Abstract

Since the nine genes of a bacteriophage were first sequenced in 1977 (Sanger et al. 1977), genomics research has transformed the study of genetics and has stimulated the emergence of an ever-lengthening list of new research specializations, including computational genomics, bioinformatics, metagenomics, pharmacogenomics, structural genomics, and more. The much-heralded publication of the human genome in Nature (Feb. 15, 2001) and Science (Feb. 16, 2001) marked not only a major advancement of knowledge but also a fundamental change in how biological research is done (Butler 2001). It has been noted that “When historians look back at this turning of the millennium, they will note that the major scientific breakthrough of the era was the characterization in ultimate detail of the genetic instructions that make a human being” (Collins and Jegalian 1999).

Keywords

National Research Council Genomic Research Human Genome Project Societal Issue National Science Education Standard 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Ai YC, Jermiin L et al (2003) Teaching bioinformatics: a student-centred and problem based approach. CAL-laborate 10:25–30Google Scholar
  2. American Association for the Advancement of Science (2003) Benchmarks for science literacy. New York: Oxford University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. American Educational Research Association. American Psychological Association, & National Council on Measurement in Education (1999) Standards for educational and psychological testing. American Educational Research Association, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  4. Andersson S, Brodin E et al. (2001) Theory-anchored evaluation applied to a CSCL intense course in Bioinformatics. Accessed on 26 Apr 2012 at www.eculturenet.org/mmi/euro-cscl/Papers/94.doc
  5. Bartlett JC (2005) Bioinformatics education in an MLIS program: the McGill experience. J Can Health Libr Assoc 26:79–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brass A (2000) Bioinformatics education—a UK perspective. Bioinformatics 16(2):77PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brewer CA, Smith D (2011) Vision and change in undergraduate biology education: a call to action. American Association for the Advancement of Science, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  8. BSCS (2003) Bioinformatics and the human genome project. Accessed on 26 Apr 2012. Available at: http://www.bscs.org/curriculumdevelopment/highschool/humangenome/bioinformatics/
  9. Butler D (2001) Postgenomics: data, data, everywhere…. Nature 414:840–841PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Calva E, Cardoso MJ, Gavilondo JV (2002) Avoiding the genomics divide. Trends Biotechnol 20:368–370PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cattley S, Arthur JW (2007) BioManager: the use of a bioinformatics web application as a teaching tool in undergraduate bioinformatics training. Brief Bioinform 8(6):457PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Collins FS, Jegalian KG (1999) Genomics and the future. Sci Am 281:50–55Google Scholar
  13. J. Craig Venter Institute (2010) First self-replicating synthetic bacterial cell (Press release), Rockville. http://www.jcvi.org/cms/press/press-releases/full-text/article/first-self-replicatingsynthetic-bacterial-cell-constructed-by-j-craig-venter-institute-researcher/
  14. Daar AS, Thorsteinsdóttir H, Martin DK, Smith AC, Nast S, Singer PA (2002) Top ten biotechnologies for improving health in developing countries. Nat Genet 32:229–232PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Doyle MP (ed) (2000) Academic excellence: the role of research in the physical sciences at undergraduate institutions. Research Corporation, TucsonGoogle Scholar
  16. Duann J, Nehm RH (2010) Assessing the educational efficacy of genomics modules, labs, and curricula: finding out what works. Paper presented at OCCBIO, ColumbusGoogle Scholar
  17. Gabric KM (2003) Bioinformatics in the biology classroom. Retrieved from 21 Oct 2004. Accessed on 26 Apr 2012 at http://www.actionbioscience.org/education/gabric.htm
  18. Greenhow C, Robelia B, Hughes JE (2009) Web 2.0 and classroom research: what path should we take now? Educ Res 38(4):246–259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Guadron L, Sajan AM, Plante O, George S, Gosser Y (2010) Genome science education for engineering majors. Paper presented at Fall 2010 mid-Atlantic ASEE conference, Villanova University, Villanova, 15–16 Oct 2010Google Scholar
  20. Handelsman J, Miller S, Pfund C (2006) Scientific Teaching. W.H. FreemanGoogle Scholar
  21. Hatfull GF, Pedulla ML, Jacobs-Sera D, Cichon PM, Foley A, Ford ME, Gonda RM, Houtz JM, Andrew J, Hryckowian AJ, Kelchner VK, Namburi S, Pajcini KV, Popovich MG, Schleicher DT, Simanek BZ, Smith AL, Zdanowicz GM, Kumar V, Peebles CL, Jacobs WR Jr, Lawrence JG, Hendrix RW (2006) Exploring the mycobacteriophage metaproteome: phage genomics as an educational platform. PLoS Genet 2(6):e92PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Haury DL (2000) High school biology textbooks do not meet national standards (ERIC digest). ERIC Clearinghouse for Science, Mathematics, and Environmental Education, ColumbusGoogle Scholar
  23. Haury DL (2001) Learning about the human genome, Part 1: Challenge to science educators (ERIC digest). ERIC Clearinghouse for Science, Mathematics, and Environmental Education, ColumbusGoogle Scholar
  24. Hulleman C, Harackiewicz JM (2009) Promoting interest and performance in high school science classes. Science 326:1410–1412PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Jurkowski A, Reid AH, Labov JB (2007) Metagenomics: a call for bringing a new science into the classroom (while it’s still new). CBE Life Sci Educ 6:260–265PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kortsarts Y, Morris R et al. (2008) Interdisciplinary introductory course in bioinformatics. Accessed online 26 Apr 2012 at isedj.org/8/27/ISEDJ.8(27).Kortsarts.pdf
  27. Krathwohl DR (2002) A revision of bloom’s taxonomy: an overview. Theory Pract 41(4):212–218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Labov JB (2004) From the national academies: the challenges and opportunities for improving undergraduate science education through introductory courses. Cell Biol Educ 3:212–214PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Labov JB, Reid AH, Yamamoto KR (2010) Integrated biology and undergraduate education: a new biology education for the twenty-first century. CBE Life Sci Educ 9:10–16PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Locks AM, Gregerman SR (2008) Undergraduate research as an institutional retention strategy: the University of Michigan Model. In: Taraban R, Blanton RL (eds) Creating effective undergraduate research programs in science: the transformation from student to scientist. Teachers College Press, New York, pp 11–32Google Scholar
  31. Lopatto D (2004) Survey of undergraduate research experiences (SURE): first findings. Cell Biol Educ 3:270–277PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lopatto D, Alvarez C, Barnard D, Chandrasekaran C, Chung H-M, Du C, Eckdahl T, Goodman AL, Hauser C, Jones CJ, Kopp OR, Kuleck GA, McNeil G, Morris R, Myka JL, Nagengast A, Overvoorde PJ, Poet JL, Reed K, Regisford G, Revie D, Rosenwald A, Saville K, Shaw M, Skuse GR, Smith C, Smith M, Spratt M, Stamm J, Thompson JS, Wilson BA, Witkowski C, Youngblom J, Leung W, Shaffer CD, Buhler J, Mardis E, Elgin SCR (2008) Genomics education partnership. Science 322:684–685PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Masiga DK, Isokpehi RD (2004) Opportunities in Africa for training in genome science. Afr J Biotechnol 3(2):117–122Google Scholar
  34. Munn M, Skinner PO, Conn L, Horsma HG, Gregory P (1999) The involvement of genome researchers in high school science education. Genome Res 9(7):597–607PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. National Research Council (1996) The national science education standards. The National Academies Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  36. National Research Council (2000) How people learn: brain, mind, experience, and school. National Academies Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  37. National Research Council (2001) Knowing what students know. National Academies Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  38. National Research Council (2003a) Bio 2010: Transforming undergraduate education for future research biologists. National Academies Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  39. National Research Council (2003b) Engaging schools: fostering high school students’ motivation to learn. National Academy Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  40. National Research Council (2009) A new biology for the 21st century: ensuring the United States leads the coming biology revolution. The National Academies Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  41. Nehm RH, Budd AF (2006) Missing “links” in bioinformatics education: expanding students’ conceptions of bioinformatics using a biodiversity database of living & fossil reef corals. Am Biol Teach 68(7):91–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) (2004) The quality of the teaching workforce. Policy brief, OECD observer. Accessed on 26 Apr 2012. Available at www.oecd.org/publications/Pol_brief
  43. Pestka E, Lim SH et al (2010) Education outcomes related to including genomics activities in nursing practice in Singapore. Int J Nurs Pract 16(3):282–288PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Ranganathan S (2009) Towards a career in bioinformatics. BMC Bioinformatics 10(Suppl 15):S1PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Rose MR, Oakley TH (2007) The new biology: beyond the modern synthesis. Biol Direct 2:30PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Rutherford FJ, Ahlgren A (1991) Science for all Americans. New York: Oxford University PressPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Sanger F, Air GM, Barrell BG, Brown NL, Coulson AR, Fiddes JC, Hutchison CA, Slocombe PM, Smith M (1977) Nucleotide sequence of bacteriophage X174 DNA. Nature 265:687–695PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Sczyrba A, Konermann S et al (2008) Two interactive bioinformatics courses at the Bielefeld University Bioinformatics Server. Brief Bioinform 9(3):243PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Shachak A, Fine S (2008) The effect of training on biologists acceptance of bioinformatics tools: a field experiment. J Am Soc Info Sci Technol 59(5):719–730CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Shachak A, Ophir R et al (2005) Applying instructional design theories to bioinformatics education in microarray analysis and primer design workshops. CBE Life Sci Educ 4(3):199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Shaffer CD, Alvarez C, Bailery C, Barnard D, Ghalla S, Chandrasekaran C, Chandrasekaran V, Chung H, Dorer DR, Du C, Eckdahl TT, Poet JL, Frohlich D, Goodman AL, Gosser Y, Hauser C, Hooper LLM, Johnson D, Jones CJ, Kaehler M, Kokan N, Kopp OR, Kuleck GA, NcNeil G, Moss R, Myka JL, Nagengast A, Morris R, Overvoorde PJ, Shoop E, Parrish S, Reed K, Regisford EG, Revie D, Rosenwald AG, Saville K, Schroeder S, Shaw M, Skuse G, Smith C, Smith M, Spana EP, Spratt M, Stamm J, Thompson JS, Wawersik M, Wilson BA, Youngblom J, Leung W, Buhler J, Mardis ER, Lopatto D, Elgin SCR (2010) The genomics education partnership: successful integration of research into laboratory classes at a diverse group of undergraduate institutions. CBE Life Sci Educ 9:55–69PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Shapiro JA (2009) Revisiting the central dogma in the 21st century. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1178:6–28PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Slawson EE, Shaffer CD, Malone CD, Leung W, Kellmann E, Shevchek RB, Craig CA, Bloom SM, Bogenpohl J II, Dee J, Morimoto ETA, Myoung J, Nett AS, Ozsolak F, Tittiger ME, Zeug A, Mary-Lou Pardue M, Buhler J, Mardis ER, Elgin S (2006) Comparison of dot chromosome sequences from D. melanogaster and D. virilis reveals an enrichment of DNA transposon sequences in heterochromatic domains. Genome Biol 7(2):R15PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Takayama K et al (2005) Teaching visualizing the science of genomics. In: Gilbert JK (ed) Visualization in science education. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 217–251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Tolvanen M, Vihinen M (2004) Virtual bioinformatics distance learning suite. Biochem Mol Biol Educ 32(3):156–160PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Tongsima W, Tongsima S et al (2008) Outlook on Thailand’s genomics and computational biology research and development. PLoS Comput Biol 4(7):e1000115PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. University of Minnesota (2008) Educational benefits of social networking sites uncovered. ScienceDaily. http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2008/06/080620133907.htm. Retrieved 28 May 2011
  58. Wefer SH, Sheppard K (2008) Bioinformatics in high school biology curricula: a study of state science standards. CBE Life Sci Educ 7(1):155PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Zeti AMH, Shamsir MS et al (2009) Bioinformatics in Malaysia: hope, initiative, effort, reality, and challenges. PLoS Comput Biol 5(8):e1000457PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Teaching and LearningThe Ohio State UniversityColumbusUSA

Personalised recommendations