Abstract
The following chapter reports findings of the European eCompetence initiative. It conceptualizes effective practices in the use of educational technologies at universities as phenomena, which are determined by three dimensions: actors in education, educational products or processes, and educational technologies. Based on the description and comparison of 33 effective practices, it defines 3 different types of competences: organizational, pedagogical, and technical. All of these three competences can come on different stages or levels, which helps to understand existing differences between universities and their need as institutions to continuously improve their organizational, pedagogical, and technical capacities.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
European eCompetence Initiative. http://www.ecompetence.info/.
- 2.
EDUCAUSE Resource Center. http://www.educause.edu/resources.
- 3.
European Computer Driving Licence. http://www.ecdl.com/.
- 4.
It has to be noted that this shift and its huge implications were underestimated even by some big technology companies. Microsoft, which held a quasi-monopoly for desktop software and based its business model on selling software, increasingly feels challenged by Google, a search engine (funded by advertisements), which incresingly offers free software as a supplement to its search engine, or by open source projects, like Firefox (browser), Linux (operating system), and open office (desktop software). One can claim that in technical terms the 1990s were Microsoft’s decade, while Google became the main representative of the network paradigm in the first decade of the new century.
- 5.
Admittedly, the foundation of these support units also has to be attributed to an increased importance of teaching in general, which partly was caused by the enhanced autonomy and accountability of Austrian Universities since the end of the 1990s. Still, it is remarkable that many of these new units or positions explicitly focus on eLearning.
References
Arjona, M. (2006). Applying CRM techniques in large-enrolment courses. European eCompetence Initiative, effective practice database.
Balaouras, P., Tsibanis, C., & Merakos, L. (2006a). e-class: implementing a national learning platform on the institutional level. European eCompetence Initiative, effective practice database.
Balaouras, P., Tsibanis, C., & Merakos, L. (2006b). e-class: providing an eLearning platform for Greece. European eCompetence Initiative, effective practice database.
Bates, A. W. (1995). Technology, Open Learning and Distance Education. Routledge Studies in Distance Education. London: Routledge.
Van der Blij, M. B. (2002). Van competenties naar proeven van bekwaamheid, een orientatie. [From competences to proving one’s competence, an orientation]. (Unpublished manuscript, University of Twente at Enschede (The Netherlands)).
Booth, J. (2006). E-moderatin: the key to effective online learning. European eCompetence Initiative, effective practice database.
Van den Branden, J. (2006). Digital chalk staff training programme. European eCompetence Initiative, effective practice database.
Bremer, C. (2003). Hochschullehre und Neue Medien. Medienkompetenz und QualifiÂzierungsstrategien für Hochschullehrende. In U. Welbers (Ed.), Hochschuldidaktische Aus- und Weiterbildung. Gütersloh: Bertelsmann.
Collis, B., & van der Wende, M. (2002). Models of Technology and Change in Higher Education. An international comparative survey on the current and future use of ICT in Higher Education. Twente: Report of the Center for Higher Education Policy Studies (CHEPS).
EC, DG EAC. (2001). The eLearning Action Plan. Designing tomorrow’s education. Commission of the European Communities, Directorat-Generale for Education and Culture, COM(2001)172 final. Retrieved from http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2001:0172:FIN:EN:PDF.
EC, DG EAC. (2003). eLearning: Better eLearning for Europe. European Commission, Directorate-General for Education and Culture. Retrieved from http://bookshop.europa.eu/en/elearning-pbNC5203207/.
Fresen, J. (2006). Training for academic staff in the use of WebCT. European eCompetence Initiative, effective practice database.
Fulk, J. (1993). Social construction of communication technology. Academy of Management Journal, 36(5), 921–950.
Fulk, J., & DeSanctis, Geraldine. (1999). Articulation of Communication Technology and Organizational Form. In Geraldine DeSanctis & J. Fulk (Eds.), Shaping Organization Form. Communication, Connection and Community, Organisation Science (pp. 5-32). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Grigoriadou, M. (2006). Enriching e-content to enhance classroom based teaching. European eCompetence Initiative, effective practice database.
Kanstrup, T. (2006). Strategy tool box for study boards. European eCompetence Initiative, effective practice database.
Kapenieks, A. (2006). eLearning for regional development in the transfer to the knowledge society. European eCompetence Initiative, effective practice database.
Koch, S. (2006). Portal for online pedagogy. European eCompetence Initiative, effective practice database.
Kuru, S. (2006). Course ONLINE: integrated course homepage management. European eCompetence Initiative, effective practice database.
Mac Labhrainn, Iain. (2006). Training the trainers - government funding scheme. European eCompetence Initiative, effective practice database.
Marjomaa, E. (2006). Evaluation of group works in eLearning. European eCompetence Initiative, effective practice database.
Papanikolaou, K. (2006). Personalised learning environments that accommodate learner’s individual differences. European eCompetence Initiative, effective practice database.
Pfeffer, T. (2006). The day of new media. European eCompetence Initiative, effective practice database.
Piault, H. (2006). XML transposition for course material. European eCompetence Initiative, effective practice database.
Prat Pla, À. (2006). Teaching the creation of a didactic unit. European eCompetence Initiative, effective practice database.
Rissanen, R. (2006). TieVie: a national staff training programme for ICT skills. European eCompetence Initiative, effective practice database.
De Rosa, A. (2006). European PhD on social representation and communication. European eCompetence Initiative, effective practice database.
Le Roux, I., & Jordaan, D. (2006). Integrating campus systems. European eCompetence Initiative, effective practice database.
Rué, J. (2006). BREVIA: learning material repositories specified for study programmes. European eCompetence Initiative, effective practice database.
Salmon, G. (2000). E-moderation: the key to teaching and learning online. London: Kogan Page.
Salmon, G. (2002). E-tivities; The key to active online learning. London: Kogan Page.
Schneckenberg, D. (2006a). The Relevance of Competence in the ICT Policy Goals of the European Commission. In Ian Mac Labhrainn, C. McDonald Legg, D. Schneckenberg, & J. Wildt (Eds.), The Challenge of eCompetence in Academic Staff Development. Galway: CELT.
Schneckenberg, D. (2006b). eCompetence Initiative Dortmund: a qualification network for academic staff. European eCompetence Initiative, effective practice database.
Seufert, S., & Euler, D. (2005). Nachhaltigkeit von eLearning-Innovationen: Fallstudien zu Implementierungsstrategien von eLearning als Innovationen an Hochschulen. Retrieved from http://www.scil.ch/publications/docs/2005-01-seufert-euler-nachhaltigkeit-elearning.pdf.
Stalmeier, M. (2006). Competence profiles: An instrument for competence management. The Challenge of eCompetence in Academic Staff Development. Galway: CELT.
Steyn, D. (2006). Web Support: Faculty wide roll out. European eCompetence Initiative, effective practice database.
Suhonen, J. (2006a). ViSCoS: a new type of curriculum to link high schools and universities. European eCompetence Initiative, effective practice database.
Suhonen, J. (2006b). ViSCoS: individual student support in a web-based learning context. European eCompetence Initiative, effective practice database.
Tomà s, M. (2006a). Conceptual maps in the subject of organizational development. European eCompetence Initiative, effective practice database.
Tomà s, M. (2006b). Innovatic: supporting groups of teachers to integrate ICT. European eCompetence Initiative, effective practice database.
Twigg, C. A. (2000a). Institutional Readiness Criteria. Prerequisites to Large-Scale Course Redesign. EDUCAUSE Review, (March/April 2000). Retrieved from http://net.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/erm0024.pdf.
Twigg, C. A. (2000b). Course readiness criteria: Identifying targets of opportunity for large-scale redesign. EDUCAUSE Review, (May/June 2000). Retrieved from http://net.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/ERM0033.pdf.
De Volder, M. (2006a). The Dutch Virtual University: Reaching eCompetence via Institutional Cooperation. In Ian Mac Labhrainn, C. McDonald Legg, D. Schneckenberg, & J. Wildt (Eds.), The Challenge of eCompetence in Academic Staff Development. Galway: CELT.
De Volder, M. (2006b). Mouse-based tutoring. European eCompetence Initiative, effective practice database.
De Vries, S. (2006). Rinc: knowledge network in networked education. European eCompetence Initiative, effective practice database.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Pfeffer, T. (2012). Competences for the Effective Use of Educational Technologies at Universities. In: Virtualization of Universities. Innovation, Technology, and Knowledge Management. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-2065-1_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-2065-1_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-2064-4
Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-2065-1
eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsBusiness and Management (R0)