Skip to main content

Competences for the Effective Use of Educational Technologies at Universities

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Virtualization of Universities

Part of the book series: Innovation, Technology, and Knowledge Management ((ITKM))

  • 875 Accesses

Abstract

The following chapter reports findings of the European eCompetence initiative. It conceptualizes effective practices in the use of educational technologies at universities as phenomena, which are determined by three dimensions: actors in education, educational products or processes, and educational technologies. Based on the description and comparison of 33 effective practices, it defines 3 different types of competences: organizational, pedagogical, and technical. All of these three competences can come on different stages or levels, which helps to understand existing differences between universities and their need as institutions to continuously improve their organizational, pedagogical, and technical capacities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    European eCompetence Initiative. http://www.ecompetence.info/.

  2. 2.

    EDUCAUSE Resource Center. http://www.educause.edu/resources.

  3. 3.

    European Computer Driving Licence. http://www.ecdl.com/.

  4. 4.

    It has to be noted that this shift and its huge implications were underestimated even by some big technology companies. Microsoft, which held a quasi-monopoly for desktop software and based its business model on selling software, increasingly feels challenged by Google, a search engine (funded by advertisements), which incresingly offers free software as a supplement to its search engine, or by open source projects, like Firefox (browser), Linux (operating system), and open office (desktop software). One can claim that in technical terms the 1990s were Microsoft’s decade, while Google became the main representative of the network paradigm in the first decade of the new century.

  5. 5.

    Admittedly, the foundation of these support units also has to be attributed to an increased importance of teaching in general, which partly was caused by the enhanced autonomy and accountability of Austrian Universities since the end of the 1990s. Still, it is remarkable that many of these new units or positions explicitly focus on eLearning.

References

  • Arjona, M. (2006). Applying CRM techniques in large-enrolment courses. European eCompetence Initiative, effective practice database.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balaouras, P., Tsibanis, C., & Merakos, L. (2006a). e-class: implementing a national learning platform on the institutional level. European eCompetence Initiative, effective practice database.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balaouras, P., Tsibanis, C., & Merakos, L. (2006b). e-class: providing an eLearning platform for Greece. European eCompetence Initiative, effective practice database.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bates, A. W. (1995). Technology, Open Learning and Distance Education. Routledge Studies in Distance Education. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van der Blij, M. B. (2002). Van competenties naar proeven van bekwaamheid, een orientatie. [From competences to proving one’s competence, an orientation]. (Unpublished manuscript, University of Twente at Enschede (The Netherlands)).

    Google Scholar 

  • Booth, J. (2006). E-moderatin: the key to effective online learning. European eCompetence Initiative, effective practice database.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van den Branden, J. (2006). Digital chalk staff training programme. European eCompetence Initiative, effective practice database.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bremer, C. (2003). Hochschullehre und Neue Medien. Medienkompetenz und Qualifi­zierungsstrategien für Hochschullehrende. In U. Welbers (Ed.), Hochschuldidaktische Aus- und Weiterbildung. Gütersloh: Bertelsmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collis, B., & van der Wende, M. (2002). Models of Technology and Change in Higher Education. An international comparative survey on the current and future use of ICT in Higher Education. Twente: Report of the Center for Higher Education Policy Studies (CHEPS).

    Google Scholar 

  • EC, DG EAC. (2001). The eLearning Action Plan. Designing tomorrow’s education. Commission of the European Communities, Directorat-Generale for Education and Culture, COM(2001)172 final. Retrieved from http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2001:0172:FIN:EN:PDF.

  • EC, DG EAC. (2003). eLearning: Better eLearning for Europe. European Commission, Directorate-General for Education and Culture. Retrieved from http://bookshop.europa.eu/en/elearning-pbNC5203207/.

  • Fresen, J. (2006). Training for academic staff in the use of WebCT. European eCompetence Initiative, effective practice database.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fulk, J. (1993). Social construction of communication technology. Academy of Management Journal, 36(5), 921–950.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fulk, J., & DeSanctis, Geraldine. (1999). Articulation of Communication Technology and Organizational Form. In Geraldine DeSanctis & J. Fulk (Eds.), Shaping Organization Form. Communication, Connection and Community, Organisation Science (pp. 5-32). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grigoriadou, M. (2006). Enriching e-content to enhance classroom based teaching. European eCompetence Initiative, effective practice database.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanstrup, T. (2006). Strategy tool box for study boards. European eCompetence Initiative, effective practice database.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kapenieks, A. (2006). eLearning for regional development in the transfer to the knowledge society. European eCompetence Initiative, effective practice database.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koch, S. (2006). Portal for online pedagogy. European eCompetence Initiative, effective practice database.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuru, S. (2006). Course ONLINE: integrated course homepage management. European eCompetence Initiative, effective practice database.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mac Labhrainn, Iain. (2006). Training the trainers - government funding scheme. European eCompetence Initiative, effective practice database.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marjomaa, E. (2006). Evaluation of group works in eLearning. European eCompetence Initiative, effective practice database.

    Google Scholar 

  • Papanikolaou, K. (2006). Personalised learning environments that accommodate learner’s individual differences. European eCompetence Initiative, effective practice database.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfeffer, T. (2006). The day of new media. European eCompetence Initiative, effective practice database.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piault, H. (2006). XML transposition for course material. European eCompetence Initiative, effective practice database.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prat Pla, À. (2006). Teaching the creation of a didactic unit. European eCompetence Initiative, effective practice database.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rissanen, R. (2006). TieVie: a national staff training programme for ICT skills. European eCompetence Initiative, effective practice database.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Rosa, A. (2006). European PhD on social representation and communication. European eCompetence Initiative, effective practice database.

    Google Scholar 

  • Le Roux, I., & Jordaan, D. (2006). Integrating campus systems. European eCompetence Initiative, effective practice database.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rué, J. (2006). BREVIA: learning material repositories specified for study programmes. European eCompetence Initiative, effective practice database.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salmon, G. (2000). E-moderation: the key to teaching and learning online. London: Kogan Page.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salmon, G. (2002). E-tivities; The key to active online learning. London: Kogan Page.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneckenberg, D. (2006a). The Relevance of Competence in the ICT Policy Goals of the European Commission. In Ian Mac Labhrainn, C. McDonald Legg, D. Schneckenberg, & J. Wildt (Eds.), The Challenge of eCompetence in Academic Staff Development. Galway: CELT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneckenberg, D. (2006b). eCompetence Initiative Dortmund: a qualification network for academic staff. European eCompetence Initiative, effective practice database.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seufert, S., & Euler, D. (2005). Nachhaltigkeit von eLearning-Innovationen: Fallstudien zu Implementierungsstrategien von eLearning als Innovationen an Hochschulen. Retrieved from http://www.scil.ch/publications/docs/2005-01-seufert-euler-nachhaltigkeit-elearning.pdf.

  • Stalmeier, M. (2006). Competence profiles: An instrument for competence management. The Challenge of eCompetence in Academic Staff Development. Galway: CELT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steyn, D. (2006). Web Support: Faculty wide roll out. European eCompetence Initiative, effective practice database.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suhonen, J. (2006a). ViSCoS: a new type of curriculum to link high schools and universities. European eCompetence Initiative, effective practice database.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suhonen, J. (2006b). ViSCoS: individual student support in a web-based learning context. European eCompetence Initiative, effective practice database.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomàs, M. (2006a). Conceptual maps in the subject of organizational development. European eCompetence Initiative, effective practice database.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomàs, M. (2006b). Innovatic: supporting groups of teachers to integrate ICT. European eCompetence Initiative, effective practice database.

    Google Scholar 

  • Twigg, C. A. (2000a). Institutional Readiness Criteria. Prerequisites to Large-Scale Course Redesign. EDUCAUSE Review, (March/April 2000). Retrieved from http://net.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/erm0024.pdf.

  • Twigg, C. A. (2000b). Course readiness criteria: Identifying targets of opportunity for large-scale redesign. EDUCAUSE Review, (May/June 2000). Retrieved from http://net.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/ERM0033.pdf.

  • De Volder, M. (2006a). The Dutch Virtual University: Reaching eCompetence via Institutional Cooperation. In Ian Mac Labhrainn, C. McDonald Legg, D. Schneckenberg, & J. Wildt (Eds.), The Challenge of eCompetence in Academic Staff Development. Galway: CELT.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Volder, M. (2006b). Mouse-based tutoring. European eCompetence Initiative, effective practice database.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Vries, S. (2006). Rinc: knowledge network in networked education. European eCompetence Initiative, effective practice database.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thomas Pfeffer .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Pfeffer, T. (2012). Competences for the Effective Use of Educational Technologies at Universities. In: Virtualization of Universities. Innovation, Technology, and Knowledge Management. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-2065-1_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics