Advertisement

Handling of Materials in the Food Industry

  • Enrique Ortega-Rivas
Chapter
Part of the Food Engineering Series book series (FSES)

Abstract

The liquid state is, undoubtedly, of utmost importance in the material processing industries, including the food industry. Numerous raw materials and products are in liquid form in a variety of processes. Liquid foods, such as milk, honey, fruit juices, beverages, and vegetable oils, are handled at different stages in food processing lines. More consistent food materials, such as salad dressings and mayonnaise, may also behave somewhat like liquids. There are many important properties of liquids to deal with, such as thermal conductivity and specific heat. However, the most relevant are those related to flow since most liquid foods are mainly conveyed and pumped, so their flow behavior properties are important for determining the power requirements for pumping or the sizing of pipes. The transport of liquid foods by pumps and other relevant applications in processing are directly related to their properties, especially density and viscosity.

Keywords

Shear Rate Yield Locus Liquid Food Shear Cell Food Powder 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Abdullah EC, Geldart D (1999) The use of bulk density measurements as flowability indicators. Powder Technol 102: 151–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Adhikari B, Howes T, Bhandari BR, Truong V (2001) Stickiness in foods: a review of mechanisms and test methods. Int J Food Prop 4: 1–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Allen T (1997) Particle Size Measurement: Surface Area and Pore Size Determination. Chapman & Hall, London.Google Scholar
  4. Barbosa-Cánovas GV, Juliano P (2005) Physical and chemical properties of food powders. In: Onwulata C (ed) Encapsulated and Powdered Foods, pp 39–71. CRC Taylor & Francis, Boca Raton, FL.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Barbosa-Cánovas GV, Málave-López J, Peleg M (1987) Density and compressibility of selected food powders mixture. J Food Process Eng 10: 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Barbosa-Cánovas GV, Málave-López J, Peleg M (1985) Segregation in food powders. Biotechnol Prog 1: 140–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Barbosa-Cánovas GV, Ortega-Rivas E, Juliano P, Yan H (2005) Food Powders: Physical Properties, Processing, and Functionality, Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, New York.Google Scholar
  8. Bourne MC (2002) Food Texture and Viscosity: Concept and Measurement. Academic Press, London.Google Scholar
  9. Brown GG (2005) Unit Operations. CBS Publishers & Distributors, New Dehli.Google Scholar
  10. Carr JF, Walker DM (1967) An annular shear cell for granular materials. Powder Technol 1: 369–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chasseray P (1994) Physical characteristics of grains and their byproducts. In: Godon B, Willm C (eds) Primary Cereal Processing, pp 85–141. Wiley-Interscience, New York.Google Scholar
  12. Dodge DW Metzner AB (1959) Turbulent flow of non-Newtonian systems. AIChE J 5: 189–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fasina OO (2007) Does a pycnometer measure the true or apparent particle density of agricultural materials? In: 2007 ASABE Annual International Meeting, Technical Papers, Volume 13.Google Scholar
  14. Fitzpatrick JJ (2005) Food powder flowability. In: Onwulata C (ed) Encapsulated and Powdered Foods, pp 247–260. CRC Taylor & Francis, Boca Raton, FL.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Freeman R, Cooke J (2006) Testing powders in process relevant ways. Powder Handl Process 18: 84–87.Google Scholar
  16. Freeman RE, Cooke JR, Schneider LCR (2009) Measuring shear properties and normal stresses generated within a rotational shear cell for consolidated and non-consolidated powders. Powder Technol 190: 65–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Geankoplis CJ (2003) Transport Processes and Separation Process Principles. Pearson Education Inc, Upper Saddle River, NJ.Google Scholar
  18. Jenike AW (1964) Storage and Flow of Solids. Bulletin No. 123 of the Utah Engineering Experiment Station. University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT.Google Scholar
  19. Kawata MK, Kurase A, Nagashima A, Yoshida K (1991) Capillary viscometers. In: Wakeham WA, Nagashima A, Sengers JV (eds) Measurement of the Transport Properties of Fluids-Experimental Thermodynamics, Vol III, pp 51–75. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford.Google Scholar
  20. Okuyama K, Kousaka Y (2006). Particle density. In: Masuda H, Higashitani K, Yoshida H (eds) Powder Technology Handbook, pp 49–52. CRC Taylor & Francis, Boca Raton, FL.Google Scholar
  21. Peleg M (1977) Flowability of food powders and methods for its evaluation - a review. J Food Process Eng 1: 303–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Pomeranz Y, Meloan CE (1994) Food Analysis: Theory and Practice. Chapman & Hall, New York.Google Scholar
  23. Schubert H (1987) Food particle technology part I: properties of particles and particulate food systems. J Food Eng 6, 1–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Schulze D, Wittmaier A (2007) Measurement of flow properties of powders at very small consolidation stresses. Bulk Solids Powder Sci Technol 2: 47–54.Google Scholar
  25. Steffe JF (1996) Rheological Methods in Food Process Engineering. Freeman Press, East Lansing, MI.Google Scholar
  26. Szczesniak AS (1983) Physical properties of foods: what they are and their relations to other food properties. In: Peleg M, Bagley EB (eds) Physical Properties of Foods, pp 1–42. AVI Publishing Co, Westport, CN.Google Scholar
  27. Teunou E, Vasseur J (1996) Time flow function: means to estimate water effect on dissoluble bulk materials flow. Powder Handl Process 8: 111–116.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Enrique Ortega-Rivas
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Chemical SciencesAutonomous University of ChihuahuaChihuahuaMexico

Personalised recommendations