Abstract
Protection is not an ethical principle as such, for it needs to be contextualized and adapted to a variety of situations and circumstances, at the same time requiring structure and specification to support practical decision-making. The main purpose of protection is to recognize and attend the needs of the helpless, appealing to the powerful to safeguard and secure the basic goods required for biological survival and social empowerment. Beyond providing material support for basic physical needs, protection furthers the acquisition of essential capabilities required to become integrated and cooperative community members: medical care, education, training in basic skills. Social protection includes institutions and arrangements to remedy the effects of disrupting events—disease, severe material losses, unemployment. In addition to being need-sensitive, protection is distance-neutral, acknowledging the destitution and help requirements of the marginalized and the distant.
The ethics of protection focuses on national goals, but also calls for international obligations to take care of world-wide destitution, inasmuch as the vested interests of globalization are holistic in their ecological and socioeconomic effects. Global commitment is often required as ex post responsibility for past colonial and exploitative politics, but protection emphasizes ex ante responsibility: present and future international ventures and agreements ought to include in their inception proactive and comprehensive protective commitments.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Arras, J. D., & Fenton, E. M. (2009). Bioethics & human rights: Access to health-related goods. The Hastings Center Report, 39(5), 27–38.
Ashcroft, R. (2008). Fair process and the redundancy of bioethics: a polemic. Public Health Ethics, 1, 3–9.
Ashford, E. (2009). In what sense is the rights to subsistence a basic right. Journal of Social Philosophy, 40, 488–503.
Beyrer, C., Villar, J. C., Suwanvanichkij, V., Singh, S., Baral, S. D., & Mills, E. J. (2007). Neglected diseases, civil conflicts, and the right to health. Lancet, 370(9587), 619–627.
Daniels, N. (2006). Equity and population health: toward a broader bioethics agenda. The Hastings Center Report, 36(4), 22–35.
Farmer, P. (1996). On suffering and structural violence: a view from below. Daedalus, 125, 261–283.
Fassin, D. (2006). La biopolitique n’est pas une politique de la vie. Sociologie et Sociétés, 38, 35–48.
Gostin, L. O., & Archer, R. (2007). The duty of States to assist other States in need: ethics, human rights, and international law. Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 35(4), 526–533. 511.
Honneth, A. (1997). Recognition and moral obligation. Social Research, 64, 16–35.
Smith, R. D., Correa, C., et al. (2009). Trade, TRIPS, and pharmaceuticals. Lancet, 373(9664), 684–691.
Stone, T. H. (2003). The invisible vulnerable: the economically and educationally disadvantaged subjects of clinical research. Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 31(1), 149–153.
Walzer, M. (1983). Spheres of justice. New York: Basic Books.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Miguel Kottow
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kottow, M. (2012). Ethics of Protection II: Basic Outline. In: From Justice to Protection. SpringerBriefs in Public Health, vol 1. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-2026-2_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-2026-2_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-2025-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-2026-2
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)