Abstract
Within the emerging field of research on student engagement, there exists a wide variety of work in terms of definitions, constructs, and methodologies. In this chapter, we argue for the importance of “finding the humanity in the data,” understanding and investigating student engagement and disengagement as a function of the perceptions of students about their experiences in the learning environment. After setting out a conceptualization of engagement, we examine data from the High School Survey of Student Engagement (HSSSE), a self-report survey containing both multiple-option and open-response questions. Our analysis is focused on the words and school experiences of students as a way of understanding levels and dimensions of student engagement in school. Using examples from the field, we describe ways in which schools use student perception data to understand and strengthen student engagement. We conclude by setting out challenges for research, policy, and practice in the field of student engagement.
My school is a good school, but I feel the only thing they care about are scores on standardized tests, not us students as individuals.
– Student respondent on the High School Survey of Student Engagement (HSSSE), Spring 2010
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Appleton, J. A., Christenson, S. L., & Furlong, M. J. (2008). Student engagement with school: Critical conceptual and methodological issues of the construct. Psychology in the Schools, 45(5), 369–386.
Appleton, J. A., Christenson, S. L., Kim, D., & Reschly, A. L. (2006). Measuring cognitive and psychological engagement: Validation of the Student Engagement Instrument. Journal of School Psychology, 44, 427–445.
Attard, C. (2009, November). Student perspectives of mathematics teaching and learning in the upper primary classroom. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Conference on Science and Mathematics Education, Penang, Malaysia.
Attard, C. (2010, July). Students’ experiences of mathematics during the transition from primary to secondary school. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia, Fremantle, Western Australia.
Bridgeland, J. M., DiIulio, J. J., Jr., & Balfanz, R. (2009). On the frontlines of schools: Perspectives of teachers and principals on the high school dropout problem. Washington, DC: Civic Enterprises.
Bridgeland, J. M., DiIulio, J. J., Jr., & Morison, K. B. (2006). The silent epidemic: Perspectives of high school dropouts. Washington, DC: Civic Enterprises.
Cohen, J., McCabe, M. E., Michelli, N. M., & Pickeral, T. (2009). School climate: Research, policy, practice, and teacher education. Teachers College Record, 111(1), 180–213.
Cook-Sather, A., & Shultz, J. (2001). Starting where the learner is: Listening to students. In J. Shultz & A. Cook-Sather (Eds.), In our own words: Students’ perspectives on school (pp. 1–17). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
Cook-Sather, A. (2002). Authorizing students’ perspectives: Toward trust, dialogue, and changes in education. Educational Researcher, 31(4), 3–14.
DeCharms, R. (1968). Personal causation: The internal affective determinants of behavior. New York: Academic Press.
Finn, J. D. (1989). Withdrawing from school. Review of Educational Research, 59(2), 117–142.
Finn, J. D. (1993). School engagement and students at risk. Washington, DC: National Center for Educational Statistics, U.S. Department of Education (NCES 93 470).
Finn, J. D., & Voelkl, K. E. (1993). Social characteristics related to school engagement. The Journal of Negro Education, 62, 249–268.
Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59–109.
Furrer, C., & Skinner, E. (2003). Sense of relatedness as a factor in children’s academic engagement and performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(1), 148–162.
Geertz, C. (1973). Thick description: Toward an interpretive theory of culture. New York: Basic Books.
Gottfried, A. E., Fleming, J. S., & Gottfried, A. W. (1994). Role of parental motivational practices in children’s academic intrinsic motivation and achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86, 104–113.
Gottfried, A. E., & Gottfried, A. W. (1996). A longitudinal study of academic intrinsic motivation in intellectually gifted children: Childhood through early adolescence. Gifted Child Quarterly, 40, 179–183.
Harter, S. (1992). The relationship between perceived competence, affect, and motivational orientation within the classroom: Process and patterns of change. In A. Boggiano & T. Pittman (Eds.), Achievement and motivation: A social-developmental perspective (pp. 77–114). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Harter, S., & Jackson, B. K. (1992). Trait vs. nontrait conceptualizations of intrinsic/extrinsic motivational orientation. Motivation and Emotion, 16, 209–230.
Hudson-Ross, S., Cleary, L. M., & Casey, M. (Eds.). (1993). Children’s voices: Children talk about literacy. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
Jimerson, S. R., Campos, E., & Greif, J. L. (2003). Toward an understanding of definitions and measures of school engagement and related terms. California School Psychologist, 8, 7–27.
Johnson, M. K., Crosnoe, R., & Elder, G. H. (2001). Students’ attachment and engagement: The role of race and ethnicity. Sociology of Education, 74, 318–340.
Johnson, M. S., & Dean, M. (2011). Student engagement and International Baccalaureate: Measuring the social, emotional, and academic engagement of IB students. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. New Orleans, LA.
Jordan, W., & Nettles, S. (1999). How students invest their time out of school: Effects on school engagement, perceptions of life chances, and achievement (Report No. 29). Baltimore, MD: Center for Research on the Education of Students Placed At Risk (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 428 174).
Klem, A. M., & Connell, J. P. (2004). Relationships matter: Linking teacher support to student engagement and achievement. Journal of School Health, 74(7), 262–273.
Kuh, G. (2003). The National Survey of Student Engagement: Conceptual framework and overview of psychometric properties. Bloomington, IN: Center for Postsecondary Research.
Lepper, M. R., Corpus, J. H., & Lyengar, S. S. (2005). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivational orientations in the classroom: Age differences and academic correlates. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97(2), 184–196.
Lepper, M. R., & Green, D. (1978). The hidden costs of reward. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Lepper, M. R., Sethi, S., Dialdin, D., & Drake, M. (1997). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation: A developmental perspective. In S. S. Luthar, J. A. Burack, D. Cicchetti, & J. R. Weisz (Eds.), Developmental psychopathology: Perspectives on adjustment, risk, and disorder (pp. 23–50). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Linnenbrink, E. A., & Pintrich, P. R. (2003). The role of self-efficacy beliefs in student engagement and learning in the classroom. Reading and Writing Quarterly: Overcoming Learning Difficulties, 19, 119–137.
Mant, J., Wilson, H., & Coates, D. (2007, July). The effect of increasing conceptual challenge in primary science lessons on pupils’ achievement and engagement. International Journal of Science Education, 29(14), 1707–1719.
Marks, H. M. (2000). Student engagement in instructional activity: Patterns in the elementary, middle, and high school years. American Educational Research Journal, 37(1), 153–184.
Morse, A. B., Anderson, A. R., Christenson, S. L., & Lehr, C. A. (2004, February). Promoting school completion. Principal Leadership Magazine, 4(5), 9–13.
Munns, G., & Woodward, H. (2006). Student engagement and student self-assessment: The REAL framework. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, 13(2), 193–213.
Newmann, F. M., Wehlage, G. G., & Lamborn, S. D. (1992). The significance and sources of student engagement. In F. M. Newmann (Ed.), Student engagement and achievement in American secondary schools (pp. 11–39). New York: Teachers College Press.
Reeve, J., Jang, H., Carrell, D., Jeon, S., & Barch, J. (2004). Enhancing student’s engagement by increasing teacher’s autonomy support. Motivation and Emotion, 28(2), 147–169.
Senge, P. M. (2000). Systems change in education. Reflections, 1(3), 52–60.
Shernoff, D. J., Csikszentmihalyi, M., Schneider, B., & Shernoff, E. S. (2003). Student engagement in high school classrooms from the perspective of flow theory. School Psychology Quarterly, 18(2), 158–176.
Skinner, E. A., Wellborn, J. G., & Connell, J. P. (1990). What it takes to do well in school and whether I’ve got it: A process model of perceived control and children’s engagement and achievement in school. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(1), 22–32.
Stillwell, R. (2010). Public school graduates and dropouts from the common core of data: School year 2007–08 (NCES 2010–341). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved June 4, 2010, from http://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch/pubsinfo.asp?pubid=2010341
Sum, A., Khatiwada, I., McLaughlin, J., with Palma, S. (2009). The consequences of dropping out of high school: Joblessness and jailing for high school dropouts and the high cost for taxpayers. Boston, MA: Center for Labor Market Studies, Northeastern University.
Waller, W. (1932). The sociology of teaching. New York: Russell & Russell.
Willms, J. D. (2003). Student engagement at school: A sense of belonging and participation. Paris, France: Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development.
Yazzie-Mintz, E. (2007). Voices of students on engagement: A report on the 2006 High School Survey of Student Engagement. Bloomington, IN: Center for Evaluation & Education Policy.
Yazzie-Mintz, E. (2009). Engaging the voices of students: A report on the 2007 & 2008 High School Survey of Student Engagement. Bloomington, IN: Center for Evaluation & Education Policy.
Yazzie-Mintz, E. (2010). Charting the path from engagement to achievement: A report on the 2009 High School Survey of Student Engagement. Bloomington, IN: Center for Evaluation & Education Policy.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Yazzie-Mintz, E., McCormick, K. (2012). Finding the Humanity in the Data: Understanding, Measuring, and Strengthening Student Engagement. In: Christenson, S., Reschly, A., Wylie, C. (eds) Handbook of Research on Student Engagement. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7_36
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7_36
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-2017-0
Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-2018-7
eBook Packages: Behavioral ScienceBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)