Skip to main content

A Cyclical Self-Regulatory Account of Student Engagement: Theoretical Foundations and Applications

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Handbook of Research on Student Engagement

Abstract

Educators have long been interested in understanding the variables or ­factors underlying student motivation and desire to engage in and regulate their academic behaviors. In this chapter, we delineate a social-cognitive theoretical framework of self-regulatory engagement that integrates a set of highly related yet distinctive constructs such as motivation, engagement, and metacognition. Central to our self-regulation framework is a cyclical feedback loop, a process that operates in a temporal sequence (before, during, and after a learning activity) and is largely cognitive in nature. We also draw a distinction between the “will” of students to engage in learning and the “skill” with which they regulate or self-manage their level of engagement. The historical evolution and the conceptual and empirical advantages of cyclical feedback loops will be emphasized along with a description of various academic intervention programs designed to teach “cyclical” thinking and strategic behaviors to academically at-risk students. Finally, an innovative alternative assessment approach, called self-regulated learning microanalysis, is presented to illustrate how researchers and practitioners can reliably and accurately capture students’ regulatory engagement in particular contexts and settings.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Agran, M., Snow, K., & Swaner, J. (1999). Teacher perceptions of self-determination: Benefits, characteristics, and strategies. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 34, 293–301.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavior change. Psychological Review, 84, 191–215.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: W. H. Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (2001). Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 1–29.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A., Barbaranelli, C., Caprara, G. V., & Pastorelli, C. (1996). Multifaceted impact of self-efficacy beliefs on academic functioning. Child Development, 67, 1206–1222.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Beck, A. T. (1963). Thinking and depression. Archives of General Psychiatry, 9, 324–333.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bembenutty, H. (2008). The last word: An interview with Barry J. Zimmerman. Journal of Advanced Academics, 20, 174–192.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boekaerts, M., Pintrich, P. R., & Zeidner, M. (Eds.). (2000). Handbook of self-regulation. San Diego, CA: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borkowski, J. G., Weyhing, R. S., & Carr, M. (1988). Effects of attributional retraining on strategy-based reading comprehension in learning disabled students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 46–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bouffard-Bouchard, T., Parent, S., & Larivee, S. (1991). Influence of self-efficacy on self-regulation and performance among junior and senior high-school age students. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 14, 153–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, D. (1995). Promoting strategic learning by postsecondary students with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 28, 170–190.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Butler, D. (1998). The strategic content learning approach to promoting self-regulated learning: A report of three studies. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 682–697.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Butler, D. L., Beckingham, B., & Lauscher, H. J. N. (2005). Promoting strategic learning by eighth-grade students struggling in mathematics: A report of three case studies. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 20, 156–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Butler, D. L., & Cartier, S. C. (2004). Promoting effective task interpretation as an important work habit: A key to successful teaching and learning. Teachers College Record, 106, 1729–1758.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carver, C. H., & Scheier, M. F. (2000). On the structure of behavioral self-regulation. In M. Boekaerts, P. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 41–84). Orlando, FL: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cassel, J., & Reid, R. (1996). Use of a self-regulated strategy intervention to improve word problem-solving skills of students with mild disabilities. Journal of Behavioral Education, 6, 153–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christenson, S. L., Reschly, A. L., Appleton, J. J., Berman-Young, S., Spanjers, D. M., & Varro, P. (2008). Best practices in fostering student engagement. In A. Thomas & J. Grimes (Eds.), Best practices in school psychology (5th ed., pp. 1099–1119). Bethesda, MD: National Association of School Psychologists.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cleary, T. J. (2009). School-based motivation and self-regulation assessments: An examination of school psychologist beliefs and practices. Journal of Applied School Psychology, 25, 71–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cleary, T. J. (2011). Emergence of self-regulated learning microanalysis: Historical overview, essential features, and implications for research and practice. In B. J. Zimmerman & D. Schunk (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cleary, T. J., & Chen, P. P. (2009). Self-regulation, motivation, and math achievement in middle school: Variations across grade level and math context. Journal of School Psychology, 47, 291–314.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cleary, T. J., Gubi, A., & Prescott, M. (2010). Motivation and self-regulation assessments: Professional practices and needs of school psychologists. Psychology in the Schools, 47(10), 985–1002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cleary, T. J., Callan, G., Peterson, J., & Adams, T. (2011). Validity of Self-Regulated Learning (SRL) in an academic context. Manuscript submitted for publication.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cleary, T. J., Platten, P., & Nelson, A. C. (2008). Effectiveness of self-regulation empowerment program with urban high school students. Journal of Advanced Academics, 20, 70–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cleary, T. J., & Zimmerman, B. J. (2001). Self-regulation differences during athletic practice by experts, non-experts, and novices. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 13, 185–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cleary, T. J., & Zimmerman, B. J. (2004). Self-regulation empowerment program: A school-based program to enhance self-regulated and self-motivated cycles of student learning. Psychology in the Schools, 41, 537–550.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cleary, T. J., & Zimmerman, B. J. (2006). Teachers’ perceived usefulness of strategy microanalytic assessment information. Psychology in the Schools, 43, 149–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cleary, T. J., Zimmerman, B. J., & Keating, T. (2006). Training physical education students to self-regulate during basketball free-throw practice. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 77, 251–262.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Clifford, M. (1986). Comparative effects of strategy and effort attributions. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 56, 75–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coalition for Psychology in Schools and Education. (2006). Report on the teacher needs survey. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, Center for Psychology in Schools and Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corno, L., & Mandinach, E. B. (1983). The role of cognitive engagement in classroom learning and motivation. Educational Psychologist, 18, 88–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eccles, J. S., & Wigfield, A. (2002). Motivational beliefs, values, and goals. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 109–132.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ericsson, K. A., & Simon, H. A. (1980). Verbal reports as data. Psychological Review, 87, 215–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74, 59–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., Prentice, K., Burch, M., Hamlett, C. L., Owen, R., et al. (2003). Enhancing third-grade students’ mathematical problem solving with self-­regulated learning strategies. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 306–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graham, S., & Harris, H. R. (2005). Improving the writing performance of young struggling writers: Theoretical and programmatic research from the center on accelerating student learning. The Journal of Special Education, 39, 19–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graham, S., Harris, K., & Troia, G. A. (1998). Writing and self-regulation: Cases from the self-regulated strategy development model. In D. H. Schunk & B. J. Zimmerman (Eds.), Self-regulated learning: From teaching to self-reflective practice. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greene, J. A., & Azevedo, R. (2007). Adolescents’ use of self-regulatory processes and their relation to qualitative mental model shifts while using hypermedia. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 36, 125–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grigal, M., Neubart, D. A., Moon, S. M., & Graham, S. (2003). Self-determination for students with disabilities: Views of parents and teachers. Exceptional Children, 70, 97–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hadwin, A. F., Winne, P. H., Stockley, D. B., Nesbit, J. C., & Woszczyna, C. (2001). Context moderates students’ self-reports about how they study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 477–487.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jimerson, S. R., & Oakland, T. D. (2007). School psychology in the United States. In S. R. Jimerson, T. D. Oakland, & P. T. Farrell (Eds.), The handbook of international school psychology. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitsantas, A., & Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Comparing self-regulatory processes among novice, non-expert, and expert volleyball players: A microanalytic study. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 14, 91–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kitsantas, A., & Zimmerman, B. J. (2006). Enhancing self-regulation of practice: The influence of graphing and self-evaluative standards. Metacognition and Learning, 1, 201–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuhl, J. (1985). Volitional mediators of cognitive-behavior consistency: Self-regulatory processes and action ­versus state orientation. In J. Kuhl & J. Beckman (Eds.), Action control: From cognition to behavior (pp. 101–128). West Berlin, Germany: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lan, W. Y. (1998). Teaching self-monitoring skills in statistics. In D. H. Schunk & B. J. Zimmerman (Eds.), Self-regulated learning: From teaching to self-reflective practice (pp. 86–105). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (1990). A theory of goal setting and task performance. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mace, F. C., Belfioree, P. J., & Hutchinson, J. M. (2001). Operant theory and research on self-regulation. In B. J. Zimmerman & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Self-regulated learning and academic achievement (2nd ed., pp. 39–66). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCombs, B. L. (2001). Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: A phenomenological view. In B. J. Zimmerman & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Self-regulated learning and academic achievement (2nd ed., pp. 67–123). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meichenbaum, D. (1977). Cognitive-behavior modification: An integrative approach. New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, G. A., Galanter, E., & Pribham, K. (1960). Plans and the structure of behavior. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Multon, K. D., Brown, S. D., & Lent, R. W. (1991). Relation of self-efficacy beliefs to academic outcomes: A meta-analytic investigation. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 18, 30–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nesbit, J. C., & Adesope, O. O. (2006). Learning with concept and knowledge maps: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 76, 413–448.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pajares, F. (2006). Self-efficacy during childhood and adolescence: Implications for teachers and parents. In F. Pajares & T. Urdan (Eds.), Self-efficacy beliefs of adolescents (pp. 339–367). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perry, N. E., VandeKamp, K. O., Mercer, L. K., & Nordby, C. J. (2002). Investigating teacher-student interactions that foster self-regulated learning. Educational Psychologist, 37, 5–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perry, N. E., & Winne, P. H. (2006). Learning from learning kits: Study traces of students’ self-regulated engagements with Computerized content. Educational Psychology Review, 18, 211–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pintrich, P. R. (2000). The role of goal orientation in self-regulated learning. In M. Boekaerts, P. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 452–502). Orlando, FL: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pintrich, P. R., & de Groot, E. V. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 33–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pintrich, P. R., Smith, D. A., & Garcia, T. (1993). Reliability and predictive validity of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ). Educational and Psychological Measurement, 53, 801–813.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Powers, W. T. (1973). Behavior: The control of perception. Chicago: Aldine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pressley, M., & McCormick, C. B. (1995). Advanced educational psychology for educators, researchers, and policymakers. New York: Harper Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Puustinen, M., & Pulkkinen, L. (2001). Models of self-regulated learning: A review. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 45, 269–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramdass, D. H., & Zimmerman, B. J. (2008). Effects of self-correction strategy training on middle school students’ self-efficacy, self-evaluation, and mathematics division learning. Journal of Advanced Academics, 20, 18–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmitz, B., & Wiese, B. S. (2006). New perspectives for the evaluation of training sessions in self-regulated learning: Time series analyses of diary data. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 31, 64–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schunk, D. H. (1981). Modeling and attributional effects on children achievement: A self-efficacy analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 73, 93–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schunk, D. H. (1982). Progress self-monitoring: Effects on children’s self-efficacy and achievement. The Journal of Experimental Education, 51, 89–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schunk, D. H. (2001). Social cognitive theory and self-regulated learning. In B. J. Zimmerman & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Self-regulated learning and academic achievement (2nd ed., pp. 125–151). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schunk, D. H., & Pajares, F. (2004). Self-efficacy in education revisited: Empirical and applied evidence. In D. M. McInerney & S. Van Etten (Eds.), Big theories revisited (pp. 115–138). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schunk, D. H., Pintrich, P. R., & Meece, J. L. (2008). Motivation in education: Theory, research, and applications (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schunk, D. H., & Swartz, C. W. (1993). Writing strategy instruction with gifted students: Effects of goals and feedback on self-efficacy and skills. Roeper Review, 15, 225–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schunk, D. H., & Zimmerman, B. J. (Eds.). (2008). Motivation and self-regulated learning: Theory, research, & applications. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sexton, M., Harris, K. R., & Graham, S. (1998). Self-regulated strategy development and the writing process: Effects on essay writing and attributions. Exceptional Children, 64, 295–311.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, E. S., Durnan, S. L., Post, E. E., & Skibitsky-Levinson, T. (2002). Self-monitoring procedures for children and adolescents. In M. R. Shinn, H. M. Walker, & G. Stoner (Eds.), Interventions for academic and behavior problems II: Preventive and remedial approaches (pp. 433–454). Washington, DC: National Association of School Psychologists.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silver, W. S., Mitchell, T. R., & Gist, M. E. (1995). Responses to successful and unsuccessful performance: The moderating effect of self-efficacy on the relationship between performance and attributions. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 62, 286–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stroud, K. C., & Reynolds, C. R. (2006). School motivation and learning strategy inventory. Los Angeles, CA: Western Psychological Services.

    Google Scholar 

  • Urdan, T., & Midgley, C. (2003). Changes in the perceived classroom goal structure and pattern of adaptive learning during early adolescence. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 28, 524–551.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wehmeyer, M. L., Agran, M., & Hughes, C. A. (2000). National survey of teachers’ promotion of self-determination and student-directed learning. The Journal of Special Education, 34, 58–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weiner, B. (1986). An attribution theory of motivation and emotion. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weinstein, C. E., Husman, J., & Dierking, D. R. (2000). Self-regulation interventions with a focus on learning strategies. In M. Boekaerts, P. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation. Orlando, FL: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weinstein, C. E., & Palmer, D. R. (1990). Learning and study strategies inventory: High school version user manual. Clearwater, FL: H&H Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winne, P. H. (2001). Self-regulated learning viewed from models of information processing. In B. J. Zimmerman & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theoretical perspectives (2nd ed., pp. 153–189). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winne, P. H., & Hadwin, A. F. (1998). Studying as self-regulated learning. In D. J. Hacker, J. Dunlosky, & A. C. Graesser (Eds.), Metacognition in educational theory and practice (pp. 279–306). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winne, P. H., & Jamieson-Noel, D. L. (2002). Exploring students’ calibration of self-reports about study tactics and achievement. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 28, 259–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winne, P. H., & Perry, N. E. (2000). Measuring self-­regulated learning. In M. Boekaerts, P. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation. Orlando, FL: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolters, C. A. (1999). The relation between high school students’ motivational regulation and their use of learning strategies, effort, and classroom performance. Learning and Individual Differences, 11, 281–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolters, C. A. (2003). Regulation of motivation: Evaluating an underemphasized aspect of self-­regulated learning. Educational Psychologist, 38, 189–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, B. J. (1995). Self-regulation involves more than metacognition: A social cognitive perspective. Educational Psychologist, 30, 217–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Attaining self-regulation: A social-cognitive perspective. In M. Boekaerts, P. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 13–39). Orlando, FL: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, B. J. (2008). Investigating self-regulation and motivation: Historical background, methodological developments, and future prospects. American Educational Research Journal, 45, 166–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, B. J., & Bandura, A. (1994). Impact of self-regulatory influences on writing course attainment. American Educational Research Journal, 31, 845–862.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, B. J., Bandura, A., & Martinez-Pons, M. (1992). Self-motivation for academic attainment. American Educational Research Journal, 31, 845–862.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, B. J., & Campillo, M. (2003). Motivating self-regulated problem solvers. In J. E. Davidson & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), The nature of problem solving. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, B. J., & Cleary, T. J. (2006). Adolescents’ development of personal agency: The role of self-­efficacy beliefs and self-regulatory skill. In F. Pajres & T. Urdan (Eds.), Self-efficacy beliefs of adolescence (pp. 45–69). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, B. J., & Cleary, T. J. (2009). Motives to self-regulate learning: A social cognitive account. In K. R. Wenzel & A. Wigfield (Eds.), Handbook of motivation at school (pp. 247–264). New York: Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, B. J., & Kitsantas, A. (1996). Self-regulated learning of a motoric skill: The role of goal-setting and self-monitoring. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 8, 60–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, B. J., & Kitsantas, A. (1997). Developmental phases in self-regulation: Shifting from process to outcome goals. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 29–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, B. J., & Labuhn, A. S. (2011). Self-regulation of learning: Process approaches to personal development. In K. Harris, S. Graham, & T. Urdan (Eds.), APA educational psychology handbook. Volume. 1: Theories, constructs, and critical issues (pp. 397–423). Washington, DC: APA Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, B. J., & Martinez-Pons, M. (1986). Development of a structured interview for assessing student use of self-regulated learning strategies. American Educational Research Journal, 23, 614–628.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, B. J., Moylan, A., Hudesman, J., White, N., & Flugman, B. (2008, June). Assessing the impact of self-reflection training with at-risk college students: Error analysis, calibration, and math attainment. Poster presented at the 2008 Research Conference of the Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, B. J., & Paulsen, A. S. (1995). Self-monitoring during collegiate studying: An invaluable tool for academic self-regulation. In P. Pintrich (Ed.), New directions in college teaching and learning. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, B. J., & Schunk, D. H. (2001). Self-regulated learning and academic achievement (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Timothy J. Cleary .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Cleary, T.J., Zimmerman, B.J. (2012). A Cyclical Self-Regulatory Account of Student Engagement: Theoretical Foundations and Applications. In: Christenson, S., Reschly, A., Wylie, C. (eds) Handbook of Research on Student Engagement. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics