Skip to main content

The Technique of Pressure Knapping in Central Asia: Innovation or Diffusion?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover The Emergence of Pressure Blade Making

Abstract

This chapter deals with the emergence and the development of the pressure knapping technique in Central Asia (republics of Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan, Kyrgyzstan, Turkmenistan, and Tajikistan). The specific context of the processes of neolithization is particularly significant for understanding the development of pressure blade technology in Central Asia as well as the reasons linked to its adoption and application in different cultural entities. The additional information provided here enriches this discussion for the neighboring regions of Russia, the Caucasus, Iran, and Afghanistan. The technological study of the major lithic assemblages recovered from Upper Paleolithic to Chalcolithic contexts across dispersed parts of Central Asia points out significant results. Thus, the emergence of the use of the pressure knapping technique during the Early Holocene in this part of Asia was associated with the appearance of microblade technology and, to some extent, bladelet production. The pressure technique appeared in Mesolithic hunter-gatherer groups that contrast sharply with the previous Paleolithic stone reduction traditions. Two concepts have been identified: the first one, called here the Yubetsu method, is closely related to the technical tradition from the Far East (Sibero-Sino-Mongolia area), and the second one linked to a bullet-shaped core and the more “classical” method, is most often associated with geometrical microliths. With the appearance of agropastoral Neolithic societies like the Jeitun culture in Southern Turkmenistan (7th–6th millennia B.C.), the pressure knapping technique was used for the production of regular blades employing the bullet-shaped core method. A more interesting and specific case in Central Asia is found among three societies involved in the process of neolithization. The Kel’teminar culture (Uzbekistan, 7th–4th millennia B.C.) illustrates the beginning of the settlement process; the subsistence strategies were marked by a focus not only on hunting and gathering but also with the appearance of domestic cattle. Its technical tradition came mainly from the local Mesolithic background. The lithic industry has evidence of several production systems (microblades, bladelets, and blades) employing at least two techniques: a very well-controlled indirect percussion and the bullet-shaped core method using a pressure technique. The Atbasar culture (Kazakhstan, 5th–4th millennia B.C.) developed from the local Mesolithic, retaining microblade production using the pressure knapping technique (bullet-shaped cores). The introduction of few regular blades (detached by indirect percussion or pressure knapping technique?) and new formal tools can be observed. The Hissar culture (Tajikistan, 7th–4th millennia B.C.) shows the exploitation of both domestic and wild animals, with a higher proportion of the latter, suggesting a short-distance form of mobile pastoralism. The lithic assemblage presents the continuation of the earlier Mesolithic tradition (pressure microblade technology according to the Yubetsu method) together with the introduction of new Neolithic components such as a blade production using the indirect percussion. During the Chalcolithic/Eneolithic period, pressure knapping tends to disappear gradually from Central Asia. Following the emergence of the first Bronze Age communities, it is seen only in the shaping process of bifacial tools and projectile points.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

     For more details about the radiocarbon dating of Siberian Paleolithic and Mesolithic sites, see Lisitsyn and Svezhentsev (1997); Kuzmin and Orlova (1998).

  2. 2.

     Tugai are the riparian forests along the rivers in the desert regions of Central Asia. They mainly consist of typical floodplain vegetation: trees (poplar, tamarisk, maple, ash, and elm), shrubs, reed, and grass communities.

  3. 3.

     This archaeological expedition, codirected by Dr. M. Khudzhanazarov (Institute of Archaeology of the Academy of Sciences of the Republic of Uzbekistan, Samarkand) and the author, is financially supported by the French Foreign Office; we owe our deep thanks to these two institutions. We express also our greatest gratitude to Prof. Dr. K. Szymczak for his financial and scientific support.

References

  • Abramova, Z. A. 1986 Klinovidnye nukleusy v paleolite Severnoj Azii. In Paleolit i Neolit, edited by V. P. Ljubin, pp. 11–16. Nauka, Leningrad

    Google Scholar 

  • Amosova, A. G., S. P. Lomov and S. A. Nesmejanov 1991 Istorija formirovanija i drevnejshego zaselenija Beshkentskoj doliny, Juzhnyj Tadzhikistan. Donish, Dushanbe

    Google Scholar 

  • Anthony, David W., and Dorcas R. Brown 2000 Eneolithic Horse Exploitation in the Eurasian Steppes: Diet, Ritual and Riding. Antiquity 74(283): 75–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Artjukhova, O. A., A. P. Derevjanko, V. T. Petrin and Zh. K. Tajmagambetov 2001 Paleoliticheskie kompleksy Semizbugu, punkt 4. Institute of Archaeology and Ethnography of the Siberian Division of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Novosibirsk.

    Google Scholar 

  • Avizova, A. K. 1990 K voprosu o kul’turnom svoeobrazii neolita Ustjurta, po dannym tipologo-statisticheskogo analiza kamennoj industrii. In Arkheologija Priaral’ja, edited by V.N. Jagodin, pp. 3–28. FAN, Tachkent.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bizhanov, E. B. 1982 Mezoliticheskie i neoliticheskie pamjatniki severo-zapadnogo Ustjurta. In Arkheologija Priaral’ja, Vol. 3, edited by S. K. Kamalov, pp. 14–39. FAN, Tashkent.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bizhanov, E. B. 1996 Kamennyj vek Ustjurta. Unpublished abstract of dissertation for the degree of Doctor of Historical Sciences, Tashkent.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brunet, F. 2002 Asie centrale: vers une redéfinition des complexes culturels de la fin du Pléistocène et des débuts de l’Holocène. Paléorient 28(2): 9–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brunet, F. 2003 De l’Epipaléolithique au Néolithique en Asie centrale : quelle néolithisation? Synthèse critique des données et étude technologique d’industries lithiques. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of Paris I Panthéon-Sorbonne, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brunet, F. 2006 Pour une nouvelle étude de la culture néolithique de Kel’teminar, Ouzbékistan. Paléorient 31(2): 87–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brunet, F. 2007 De l’imitation à l’emprunt dans les sociétés néolithiques et chalcolithiques d’Asie centrale: Ouzbékistan–Turkménistan–Iran. In Mobilités, immobilismes. L’emprunt et son refus, edited by Pierre Rouillard, Catherine Perlès and Emmanuel Grimaud, pp. 253–266. De Boccard, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chindin, A. Ju 1989 Otnositel’naja khronologija kremnevogo inventarja poselenija Akimbek. In Voprosy arkheologii Tsentral’nogo i Severnogo Kazakhstana, pp. 12–19. National University of Karaganda, Karaganda.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, Richard S., and L. Dupree 1977 Prehistory Survey in Central Afghanistan. Journal of Field Archaeology 4(2): 139–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Debaine-Francfort, C. 1988 Archéologie du Xinjiang: des origines aux Han. Paléorient 14(1): 5–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Derevjanko, A. P., B. Zh. Aubekerov, V. T. Petrin, Zh. K. Tajmagambetov, O. A. Artjukhova, V. N. Zenin, and V. G. Petrov 1993 Paleolit Severnogo Pribalkhash’ja (Semizbugu punkt 2, rannij-pozdnij Paleolit). Institute of Archaeology and Ethnography of the Siberian Division of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Institute of Archeology of the Academy of Sciences of the Republic of Kazakhstan, Novosibirsk.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dupree, L., and R. S. Davis 1972 The Lithic and Bone Specimens from Aq-Kupruk and Darra-i-Kur. Transactions of the American Philosophical Society, new series 62(4): 14–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dzhurakulov, M. D., and N. U. Kholmatov 1991 Mezolit i Neolit srednego Zarafshana, Sazaganskaja kultura. FAN, Tashkent.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elston, R. G., and P. J. Brantingham 2002 Microlithic Technology in Northern Asia: A Risk-Minimizing Strategy of the Late Paleolithic and Early Holocene. In Thinking Small: Global Perspectives on Microlithization edited by Robert G. Elston and Steven L. Kuhn, pp. 103–116. Archeological Papers of the American Anthropological Association, Arlington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goebel, T. 2002 The ‘Microblade Adaptation’ and Recolonization of Siberia during the Late Upper Pleistocene. In Thinking Small: Global Perspectives on Microlithization edited by Robert G. Elston and Steven L. Kuhn, pp. 117–131. Archeological Papers of the American Anthropological Association, Arlington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guljamov, JA. G., U. I. Islamov, and A. Askarov 1966 Pervobytnaja kul’tura i voznik’novenie oroshaemogo zemledelija v nizov’jakh Zarafshana. FAN, Tashkent.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, D. R., V. M. Masson, Y. E. Berezkin, M. P. Charles, C. Gosden, G. C. Hillman, A. K. Kasparov, G. F. Korobkova, K. Kurbansakhatov, A. J. Legge, and S. Limbrey 1993, Investigating early agriculture in Central Asia: new research at Jeitun, Turkmenistan. Antiquity 67(255): 324–338.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, D. R., C. Gosden, and M. P. Charles 1996, Jeitun: Recent Excavations at an Early Neolithic Site in Southern Turkmenistan. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 2: 423–442.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inizan, M.-L. 1991 Le débitage par pression: des choix culturels. In 25 ans d’études technologiques en Préhistoire: bilan et perspectives (Actes des XIe Rencontres internationales d’archéologie et d’histoire d’Antibes, 18-20 octobre 1990) edited by Catherine Perlès, pp. 367–377. Ed. APDCA, Juan-les-Pins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inizan, M.-L. Monique Lechevallier, and Patrick Plumet 1992 A technological marker of the penetration into North America: Pressure Microblade debitage. Its Origin in the Paleolithic of North Asia and its Diffusion. In Materials Research Society Symposium Proceedings, edited by Pamela M. Vandiver, James R. Druzik, George Segan Wheeler and Ian C. Freestone, pp. 661–681. Materials Issues in Art and Archaeology III, Vol. 267. Materials Research Society, Pittsburgh.

    Google Scholar 

  • Islamov, U. I. 1980 Obishirskaja kul’tura. FAN, Tashkent.

    Google Scholar 

  • Islamov, U. I., and V. I. Timofeev 1986 Kul’tura kamennogo veka Tsentral’noj Fergany. FAN, Tashkent.

    Google Scholar 

  • Itina, M. A. 1959 Pervobytnaja keramika Khorezma. In Keramika Khorezma. Trudy khorezmskoj arkheologo-etnograficheskoj ekspeditsii, Vol. IV, edited by S. P. Tolstov and M. G. Vorob’eva, pp. 5–62. Academy of Sciences of the USSR, Moscow.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jusupov, A. Kh., and V. S. Solov’ev 1973 Novye arkheologicheskie otkrytija v Javanskoj doline. Arkheologicheskie raboty v Tadzhikistane 10: 62–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalieva, S. S. 1998 Poselenie Khozaj I. Academy of Sciences of the Republic of Kazakhstan, Almaty

    Google Scholar 

  • Khlobystin, D. P. 1996 Vostochnaja Sibir’ i Dal’nij Vostok. In Neolit Severnoj Evrazii edited by S. V. Oshibkina, pp. 270–305. Nauka, Moscow.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirjushin, Ju. F., and G. A. Kl’jukin 1985 Pamjatnika neolita i bronzy jugu-zapadnogo Altaja. In Altaj v epokhe kamnja i rannego metala, pp. 73–117. National University of Altaï, Barnaul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kislenko, A. M., and A. A. Pleshakov 1998 Neoliticheskaja stojanka Vinogradovka 14. In Voprosy arkheologii Kazakhstana edited by Z. Samachev, pp. 25–37. Gylym: Almaty-Moscow.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krizhevskaja, L. Ja. 1968 Neolit Juzhnogo Urala. Nauka, Leningrad.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuzmin, Y. V., and L. A. Orlova 1998 Radiocarbon Chronology of the Siberian Paleolithic. Journal of World Prehistory 12(1): 1–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levine, M. A. 1999 The origins of horse husbandry on the Eurasian Steppe. In Late Prehistoric Exploitation of the Eurasian Steppe, edited by Marsha A. Levine, Yuri Rassamakin, Aleksandr M. Kislenko and Nataliya S. Tatarintseva, pp. 5–58. McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lisitsyn, N. F., and Ju. S. Svezhentsev 1997 Radiouglerodnaja khronologija verkhnego paleolita Severnoj Azii. In Radiouglerodnaja khronologija paleolita Vostochnoj Evropy i Severnoj Azii. Problemy i perspektivy edited by A. A. Sinitsyn and N. D. Praslov, pp. 67–108. Russian Academy of Sciences, Sankt-Petersburg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Litvinskij, B. A., and V. A. Ranov (editors) 1998 Istorija tadzhikskogo naroda. Surush, Dushanbe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Masson, V. M. 1960 Dzhejtunskaja kul’tura. In Trudy Juzhno-Turkmenistanskoj Arkheologicheskoj Kompleksnoj Ekspeditsii, Vol. X, edited by M. E. Masson, pp. 37–109. Academy of Sciences of Turkmenistan, Ashgabat.

    Google Scholar 

  • Masson, V. M. 1971 Poselenie Dzhejtun (problema stanovlenija proizvodjashchej ekonomiki). Materialy i issledovanija po arkheologii SSSR n°180. Nauka, Leningrad.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matjushin, G. N. 1973 Mnogoslojnoe poselenie Mysovoe na oz. Karabalykty na Juzhnom Urale. Kratkie soobshchenija 136: 67–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matjushin, G. N. 1976 Mezolit Juzhnogo Urala. Nauka, Moscow.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matjushin, G. N. 1989 Mezolit Juzhnogo Zaural’ja. In Mezolit SSSR edited by L. V. Kol’tsov, pp. 144–148. Nauka, Moscow.

    Google Scholar 

  • Medoev, A. G. 1970 Arealy paleoliticheskikh kul’tur Sary-Arka. In Po sledam drevnikh kul’tur Kazakhstana, edited by M. K. Kadyrbaev, pp. 200–216. Nauka, Alma-Ata.

    Google Scholar 

  • Medoev, A. G.1982 Geokhronologija paleolita Kazakhstana. The XI INQUA Congress. Nauka, Alma-Ata.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meshcherjakov, D. V., and N. L. Morgunova 1996 K probleme proiskhozhdenija konevodstva na Juzhnom Urale. In Voprosy arkheologii zapadnogo Kazakhstana. Sbornik nauchnykh trudov, Vol. 1, edited by V. V. Rodionov and E. Zh. Kurmanbekov, pp. 46–55. Dialog, Samara.

    Google Scholar 

  • Molodin, V. I. 1977 Epokha neolita i bronzy lesostepnogo Ob’-Irtysh’ja. Nauka, Novosibirsk.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mussi, M. 1979 Darra Kalon Rock Shelter (Northern Afghanistan): Levels I-V. East and West, new series 29(1–4): 189–220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Okladnikov, A. P. 1981 Paleolit Tsentral’noj Azii: Moil’tyn am, Mongolija. Nauka, Novosibirsk.

    Google Scholar 

  • Okladnikov, A. P., and Z. A. Abramova 1994 Paleolit Tsentral’noj Azii-Mongolii. Nauka, Sankt-Pertersburg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pelegrin, J. 1988 Débitage expérimental par pression: du plus petit au plus grand. In Technologie Préhistorique, edited by Jacques Tixier, pp. 37–53. Notes et Monographies Techniques du CRA 25. Editions du CNRS, Valbonne.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petrin, V. T., and Zh. K. Tajmagambetov 2000 Kompleksy paleoliticheskoj stojanki Shul’binka iz verkhnego Priirtysh’ja. Al’-Farabi Kazakh National University, Almaty.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pleshakov, A. A. 1993 Kharakter i razvitie orudij truda naselenija kamennogo veka epokhi golotsena Priishim’ja. Unpublished abstract of dissertation for the degree of Candidate of Historical Sciences, Almaty.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ranov, V. A. 1973 Shugnou, mnogoslojnaja paleoliticheskaja stojanka v verkhov’jarkh r. Jakhsu (raskopki 1969-1970 gg.). Arkheologicheskie raboty v Tadzhikistane 10: 42–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ranov, V. A. 1975 Pamir i problema zaselenija vysokogornoj Azii chelovekom kamennogo veka. Strany i narody Vostoka 16: 136–157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ranov, V. A. 1982 Gissarskaja kul’tura: rasprostranenie, khronologija, ekonomika. In Kul’tura pervobytnoj epokhi Tadzhikistana, ot Mezolita do Bronzy, pp. 22–41. Donish, ushanbe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ranov, V. A. 1984 Douze années de recherches sur la préhistoire au Tadjikistan méridional et au Pamir (1971-1982). Paléorient 10(2): 5–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ranov, V. A. 1985 Gissarskaja kul’tura, neolit gornykh oblastij Srednej Azii (proiskhozhdenie, rasprostranenie, osobennosti). In Kamennyj vek Severnoj, Srednej i Vostochnoj Azii edited by V. E. Larichev, pp. 10–35. Nauka, Novosibirsk.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ranov, V. A. 1988 Kamennyj vek Juzhnogo Tadzhikistana i Pamira. Unpublished abstract of dissertation for the degree of Doctor of Historical Sciences, Novosibirsk.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ranov, V. A. 1992 Genezis i periodizatsija pamjatnikov kamennogo veka v Tadzhikistane. In Problemy istorii kul’tury Tadzhikskogo naroda, pp. 28–48. Hisor, Dushanbe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ranov, V. A. 1996 Mogut li geometricheskie mikrolity byt’ pokazatelem migratsionnykh protsessov v Srednej Azii? Drevnosti 19: 25–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ranov, V. A., and G. F. Korobkova 1971 Tutkaul, mnogoslojnoe poselenie Gissarskoj kul’tury v Juzhnom Tadzhikistane. Sovetskaja Arkheologija 2: 133–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ranov, V. A., A. A. Nikonov, and M. M. Pakhomov 1976 Osadnistvo epokhi kamnja u podnozhi Pamiru. Acta Archaeologica Carpathica 16: 5–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Serikov, Ju. B. 1998 Geometricheskie mikrolity Srednego Zaural’ja. Rossijskaja Arkheologija 1: 117–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Szymczak, K., and M. Khudzhanazarov (and with the contribution of Michel Fontugne) 2006a Exploring the Neolithic of the Kyzyl-Kums: Ayakagytma “the Site” and other collections. Swiatowit, Supplement Series P: Prehistory and Middle Ages Vol. XI, Central Asia, Prehistoric Studies 2. Institute of Archaeology, Warsaw University, Warsaw.

    Google Scholar 

  • Szymczak, K., and M. Khudzhanazarov 2006b Bullet-shaped core reduction in Kelteminar culture (Neolithic of Central Asia). In The Stone: Technique and Technology edited by A. Wiśniewski, T. Płonka and J. M. Burdukiewicz, pp. 191–198. Institute of Archaeology, University of Wrocław, Wrocław.

    Google Scholar 

  • Texier, P.-J. 1982 Le Débitage par pression pectorale à la béquille: une approche expérimentale au plus près des paramètres à l’origine de la rupture fragile des roches dures. In Tailler ! Pour quoi faire: Préhistoire et technologie lithique II. Recent progress in microwear studies edited by Daniel Cahen, pp. 57–64. Studia Praehistorica Belgica 2.Koninklijk Museum voor Midden-Afrika, Tervuren.

    Google Scholar 

  • Texier, P.-J. 1984 Un débitage expérimental de silex par pression pectorale à la béquille. Bulletin de la Société préhistorique française 81(1): 25–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tolstov, S. P. 1958 Raboty Khorezmskoj arkheologo-etnograficheskoj ekspeditsii AN SSSR v 1949–1953 gg. In Arkheologicheskie i etnograficheskie raboty khorezmskoj ekspeditsii 1949–1953 edited by S. P. Tolstov pp. 7–258. Trudy khorezmskoj arkheologo-etnograficheskoj ekspeditsii Vol. II. Academy of Sciences of USSR, Moscow.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tolstov, S. P. (editor) 1959 Polevye issledovanija Khorezmskoj ekspeditsii v 1954–1956 gg. Materialy Khorezmskoj ekspeditsii Vol. 1. Academy of Sciences of USSR, Moscow.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vinogradov, A. V. 1957 K voprosu o juzhnykh svjazjakh kel’teminarskoj kul’tury. Sovetskaja Arkheologija 1: 25–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vinogradov, A. V. 1960 Novye neoliticheskie nakhodki Khorezmskoj ekspeditsii AN SSSR 1957 g. In Polevye issledovanija Khorezmskoj ekspeditsii v 1957 godu, edited by S. P. Tolstov, pp. 63–81. Materialy Khorezmskoj ekspeditsii Vol. 4. Academy of Sciences of USSR, Moscow

    Google Scholar 

  • Vinogradov, A. V. 1963 Novye materialy dlja izuchenija Kel’teminarskoj kul’tury. In Polevye issledovanija khorezmskoj ekspeditsii v 1958-1961 gg edited by S. P. Tolstov, pp. 91–102. Materialy Khorezmskoj ekspeditsii vol. 6. Academy of Sciences of USSR, Moscow

    Google Scholar 

  • Vinogradov, A. V. 1968 Neoliticheskie pamjatniki Khorezma. Nauka, Moscow.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vinogradov, A. V. 1981a Drevnie okhotniki i rybolovy Sredneaziatskogo Mezhdurechija. Nauka, Moscow.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vinogradov, A. V. 1981b Novye materialy po periodizatsii i khronologii neolita Kyzylkumov. In Kul’tura i iskusstvo drevnego Khorezm, edited by M. A. Itina, Ju. A. Rapoport, N.S. Sycheva and B. I. Vajnberg, pp. 88–98. Nauka, Moscow.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vinogradov, A. V., and E. D. Mamedov 1975 Pervobytnyj Ljavljakan, etapy drevnejshego zaselenija i osvoenija Vnutrennikh Kyzylkumov. Nauka, Moscow.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zajbert, V. F. 1992 Atbasarskaja kul’tura. Ural Division of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Ekaterinburg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zajbert, V. F. 1993 Eneolit Uralo-Irtyshskogo mezhdurech’ja. Academy of Sciences of the Republic of Kazakhstan, Petropavlovsk.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zajbert, V. F., and T. M. Potemkina 1981 K voprosu o Mezolite lesostepnoj chasti Tobolo-Irtyshkogo mezhdurech’ja. Sovetskaja Arkheologija 3: 107–130.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The results discussed in this article would not have been possible without the support of many colleagues from various research institutes: the Institute of Archaeology of the Academy of Sciences of Uzbekistan (Samarkand), the Al-Farabi Kazakh National University (Almaty), the Margulan Institute of Archaeology of the Academy of Sciences of Kazakhstan (Almaty), the Central State Museum of Kazakhstan (Almaty), the Turco-Kazakh Ahmed Yesevi University (Turkestan), the History Museum (Shymkent), the Institute of Archaeology, History and Ethnology of the Academy of Sciences of Tajikistan (Dushanbe), the Institute for the History of Material Culture of the Russian Academy of Sciences (St. Petersburg), and the Institute of Archaeology of the Russian Academy of Sciences (Moscow). I would like to express here my deep gratitude to all of them for providing me with full access to their scientific material. My grateful thanks are due to the reviewers for helping to improve noticeably the English language quality of the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Frédérique Brunet .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Brunet, F. (2012). The Technique of Pressure Knapping in Central Asia: Innovation or Diffusion?. In: Desrosiers, P. (eds) The Emergence of Pressure Blade Making. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-2003-3_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics