Surface Probe Techniques

Chapter

Abstract

Study of surface properties is of significance in tribology since interaction between objects takes place at surface level and also surface properties are different than the bulk of the material. This chapter discusses about different surface probe techniques which are used to characterize the surface at nanoscale. Depending upon the interaction of the probe (electron/mechanical) with the sample, different techniques are developed. In case electron probe, scanning electron microscope and transmission electron microscope are used to study surface as well as subsurface information. In case of mechanical probes, atomic force microscope and nanoindentation techniques are widely used in nanoscale tribology. Each of the above techniques is discussed in this chapter with the working principle to application along with the limitations. Finally, recent developments in real-time tribological studies or in situ techniques are discussed.

Keywords

Dust Depression Argon Hydrocarbon Tungsten 

References

  1. 1.
    Beilby G (1921) Aggregation and flow of solids. Macmillan, LondonGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bowden F, Hughes TP (1937) Physical properties of surfaces. IV. Polishing, surface flow and the formation of the Beilby layer. Proc Roy Soc Lond A 160:575–587CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bhushan B (2003) Adhesion and stiction: mechanisms, measurement techniques, and methods for reduction. J Vac Sci Technol B 21:2262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Goldstein J et al (2003) Scanning electron microscopy and x-ray microanalysis. Springer Science + business media, New York, NYCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Donald AM (2003) The use of environmental scanning electron microscopy for imaging wet and insulating materials. Nat Mater 2:511–516CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Crockett R, Roos S, Rossbach P, Dora C, Born W, Troxler H (2005) Imaging of the surface of human and bovine articular cartilage with ESEM and AFM. Tribol Lett 19(4):311–317CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Williams DB, Carter CB (2009) Transmission electron microscopy. A textbook for materials science. Springer Science + business media, New York, NYCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bobji MS (1999) Studies in depth sensing indentation, Ph.D. Thesis, Indian Institute of Science, BangaloreGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Tabor D (1951) Hardness of metals. Oxford University Press, New York, NYGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Oliver WC, Pharr GM (1992) An improved technique for determining hardness and elastic modulus using load and displacement sensing indentation experiments. J Mater Res 7(06):1564–1583CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Fischer-Cripps AC (2004) Nanoindentation. Springer, New York, NYCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Li X, Bhushan B (2002) A review nanoindentation continuous stiffness measurement technique and its applications. Mater Charact 48(1):11–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Bhushan B (1999) Handbook of micro/nanotribology, 2nd edn, CRC Press LLC, Boca Raton, FLGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Singer L, Pollock HM (1992) Fundamentals of friction: macroscopic and microscopic processes. Kulwer Academic Publishers, NetherlandsCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Lim SC, Brunton JH (1985) A dynamic wear rig for the scanning electron microscope. Wear 101:81–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Rabea R, Breguetb JM, Schwallera P, Staussa S, Hauga FJ, Patscheidera J, Michlera J (2004) Observation of fracture and plastic deformation during indentation and scratching inside the scanning electron microscope. Thin Solid Films 469–470:206–213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Suh NP (1986) Tribophysics. Prentice-Hall, Inc, Englewood Cliffs, NJGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Rigney DA (1981) Fundamentals of friction and wear of materials. American Society for metals, Metals Park, OHGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Gane N (1970) The direct measurement of strength of metals on a sub-micrometer scale. Proc Roy Soc Lond A 317:367–391CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Wall MA, Dahmen U (1998) An in situ nanoindentation specimen holder for a high voltage transmission electron microscope. Microsc Res Tech 42:248–254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Wall MA, Stach EA, Freeman T, Minor AM, Owen DK, Cumings J, Chraska T, Hull R, Morris JW Jr, Zettl A, Dahmen U (2001) Development of a nanoindenter for in situ transmission electron microscopy. Microsc Microanal 7:507–517Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Minor AM, Morris JW Jr, Stach EA (2001) Quantitative in situ nanoindentation in an electron microscope. Appl Phys Lett 79(11):1625–1627CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Kizuka T (1998) Atomic visualization of deformation in gold. Phys Rev B 57:158–163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Erts D, Lohmus A, Lohmus R, Olin H (2001) Instrumentation of STM and AFM combined with transmission electron microscope. Appl Phys A 72(suppl):S71–S74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Bobji MS, Ramanujan CS, Pethica JB, Inkson BJ (2006) A miniaturized TEM nanoindenter for studying material deformation in situ. Meas Sci Technol 17:1–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Bobji MS, Pethica JB, Inkson BJ (2005) Indentation mechanics of Cu–Be quantified by an in situ transmission electron microscopy mechanical probe. J Mater Res 20(10):2726–2732CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Anantheshwara K, Bobji MS (2010) In-situ transmission electron microscope study of single asperity sliding contacts. Tribol Int 43(5–6):1099–1103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Anantheshwara K, Lockwood AJ, Mishra RK, Inkson BJ, Bobji MS (2012) Dynamical evolution of wear particles in nanocontacts. Tribol Lett 45(2):229–235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Lockwood AJ, Anantheshwara K, Bobji MS, Inkson BJ (2011) Friction formed liquid droplets. Nanotechnology 22:105703CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mechanical EngineeringIndian Institute of ScienceBangaloreIndia

Personalised recommendations