Skip to main content

Part of the book series: SpringerBriefs in Electrical and Computer Engineering ((BRIEFSELECTRIC))

  • 640 Accesses

Abstract

Medical images can be described properly only by using a set of specific words. In practice, this constraint can be satisfied by the usage of ontologies. In this chapter, we focus on the existing definitions for ontologies and usability. Several design criteria and development tools are presented to illustrate the means available for creating and maintaining ontologies. Ontologies are frequently used in medical domain, and for this reason, several aspects related to the applicability of the ontology in this domain are presented. Existing ontologies are provided in formats that are not always easy to interpret and use. A high flexibility is obtained when an ontology is created from scratch using a custom approach. Because of this, we are describing a custom approach for obtaining an ontology using a medical source of information like MeSH. The content of an ontology needs to be stored in a specific format. The Topic Maps standard was proved to be an efficient mechanism that can be successfully used to represent the content of our ontology.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 34.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 49.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Moriya N, Hasharon R Ontology. The specification of a shared conceptualization, A review document source. http://www.iqlue.com/prosearch/ProSearchOntology.jsp?type=CMP. Accessed 26 Aug 2011

  2. Staab S, Studer R (eds) (2009) Handbook on ontologies, 2nd edn. Series: International handbooks on information systems, Springer, Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  3. Gruber TR (1993) A translation approach to portable ontology specifications. Knowl Acquis 5:199–220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Noy NF, McGuinness DL (2001) Ontology development 101: a guide to creating your first ontology, Stanford University, Stanford. http://www-ksl.stanford.edu/people/dlm/papers/ontology101/ontology101-noy-mcguinness.html

  5. The Generalized Upper Model. http://www.fb10.uni-bremen.de/anglistik/langpro/webspace/jb/gum/index.htm. Accessed 26 Aug 2011

  6. Sensus ontology. http://www.isi.edu/natural-language/projects/ONTOLOGIES.html. Accessed 21 Aug 2011

  7. Penman Upper Model. http://www.fb10.uni-bremen.de/anglistik/langpro/kpml/um89/um89-root.htm. Accessed 26 Aug 2011

  8. Van Der P, Vet EP, Speel P, Mars NJI (1994) The Plinius ontology of ceramic materials. Workshop notes ECAI’94 workshop comparison of implemented ontologies: 187–205

    Google Scholar 

  9. Frame ontology. http://www-ksl.stanford.edu/knowledge-sharing/ontologies/html/frame-ontology/index.html. Accessed 21 Aug 2011

  10. Thomas RG (1993) Toward principles for the design of ontologies used for knowledge sharing. In: Guarino N, Poli R (eds) Formal ontology in conceptual analysis and knowledge representation. Kluwer Academic, Deventer

    Google Scholar 

  11. Uschold M, Gruninger M (1996) Ontologies: principles, methods and applications. Knowl Eng Rev 11(2):93–137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Gennari J, Musen MA, Fergerson RW, Grosso WE, Crubezy M, Eriksson H, Noy NF, Tu SW (2003) The evolution of Protégé: an environment for knowledge-based systems development. Int J Hum Comp Stud 58(1):89–123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Knublauch H, Fergerson RW, Noy NF, Musen MA (2004) The Protégé OWL plugin: an open development environment for semantic web applications. In: 3rd international semantic web conference, Hiroshima, 2004

    Google Scholar 

  14. Web Ontology Language (OWL). http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-features/. Accessed 10 Aug 2011

  15. Resource Description Framework (RDF). http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Resource_Description_Framework. Accessed 10 Aug 2011

  16. DIG Interface. http://dig.sourceforge.net/. Accessed 10 Aug 2011

  17. RacerPro. http://www.racer-systems.com/. Accessed 10 Aug 2011

  18. FaCT++. http://owl.cs.manchester.ac.uk/fact++/. Accessed 10 Aug 2011

  19. KAON2. http://kaon2.semanticweb.org/. Accessed 10 Aug 2011

  20. Jena. http://jena.sourceforge.net/. Accessed 15 July 2011

  21. Kalyanpur A, Parsia B, Sirin E, Cuenca-Grau B, Hendler J (2005) SWOOP, a web ontology editing browser. J Web Semantics 4(2):144–153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Rector AL, Rogers JE, Zanstra PE, Van Der Haring E. OpenGALEN: open source medical terminology and tools. In: Proceedings of the AMIA Symposium, Washington DC, 2003, p 982

    Google Scholar 

  23. Gangemi A, Pisanelli DM, Geri S (1999) An overview of the ONIONS project: applying ontologies to the integration of medical terminologies. Data Knowl Eng 31:183–220

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. http://lhncbc.nlm.nih.gov/cgsb_site/servlet/Turbine/template/research%2Cmedterm%2COntology.vm. Accessed 15 July 2011

  25. The Gene Ontology Consortium (2000) Gene ontology: tool for the unification of biology. Nat Genet 25:25–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. The Gene Ontology Consortium (2001) Creating the gene ontology resource: design and implementation. Genome Res 11(8):1425–1433

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Rosse C, Mejino JLV (2003) A reference ontology for bioinformatics: the foundational model of anatomy. J Biomed Inform 36:478–500

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Topic Maps. http://www.topicmaps.org/. Accessed 15 July 2011

  29. XTM syntax. http://www.topicmaps.org/xtm/. Accessed 20 July 2011

  30. LTM. http://www.ontopia.net/download/ltm.html. Accessed 20 July 2011

  31. AsTMa. http://astma.it.bond.edu.au/. Accessed 20 July 2011

  32. Omigator. http://www.ontopia.net/solutions/omnigator.html. Accessed 20 July 2011

  33. Empolis K42. http://notendur.hi.is/joner/eaps/cs_empo.htm. Accessed 20 July 2011

  34. TM4L. http://compsci.wssu.edu/iis/nsdl/. Accessed 29 Aug 2011

  35. Nelson SJ, Johnston D, Humphreys BL (2001) Relationships in medical subject headings. In: Bean CA, Green R (eds) Relationships in the organization of knowledge. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 171–184

    Google Scholar 

  36. http://www.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/2010/mesh_browser/MeSHtree.html. Accessed 20 Aug 2011

  37. http://www.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/filelist.html. Accessed 20 Aug 2011

  38. TMNav. http://tm4j.org/tmnav.html. Accessed 20 Aug 2011

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Liana Stanescu .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Stanescu, L., Burdescu, D.D., Brezovan, M., Mihai, C.G. (2012). Ontologies. In: Creating New Medical Ontologies for Image Annotation. SpringerBriefs in Electrical and Computer Engineering(). Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-1909-9_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-1909-9_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-1908-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-1909-9

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics