Abstract
The USDL has been designed as a means to describe services so that they can be traded via the Internet. The previous parts outlined the status-quo of service description research and practice and highlighted by feature comparison that USDL outstands related approaches in various concerns. However, for evaluating the actual worthiness of a modeling language such as USDL, potential users will consider the fit of the language with the contingent influences their organizations have to deal with. To fill this gap, the purpose of this chapter is to identify requirements for a service description language from potential USDL users. The presented research takes a semiotic theory perspective to the design of modeling languages. Through a Delphi study approach, i.e., an anonymous, written multi-stage survey process, the chapter elaborates a set of requirements. The requirements can be used to ex-post test if the features of the USDL actually address the users’ needs and to recheck the underlying assumptions of the USDL design and development process. While finding broad consent with most requirements, we also observed differentiated needs related to the intended use of the USDL.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
J. Becker and P. Delfmann. Reference Modeling. Efficient Information Systems Design Through Reuse of Information Models. Physica, Berlin, Germany, 2007.
A. F. Blackwell. Pictorial representation and metaphor in visual language design. J. Vis. Lang. Comput., 12(3):223–252, 2001.
N. Dalkey. An experimental study of group opinion: The delphi method. Futures, 1(5):408 – 426, 1969.
E. Davidson. Technology frames and framing: A socio-cognitive investigation of requirements determination. MIS Quarterly, 26(4):329–358, 2002.
A. L. Delbecq, A. H. van De Ven, and D. H. Gustafson. Group Techniques for Program Planning: A guide to nominal group and Delphi processes. Scott. Foresman, Gleview, IL, USA, 1975.
G. Guizzardi. Ontological foundations for structural conceptual models. PhD thesis, CTIT, Centre for Telematics and Information Technology, University of Twente, Enschede, 2005.
G. Guizzardi, L. F. Pires, and M. J. van Sinderen. On the role of domain ontologies in the design of domain-specific visual modeling languages. In J.-P. Tolvanen, J. Gray, and M. Rossi, editors, Proceedings of the 2nd OOPSLA Workshop on Domain-Specific Visual Modeling Language, pages 25–38, 2002.
D. Gupta and N. Prakash. Engineering methods from method requirements specifications. Requir. Eng., 6(3):135–160, 2001.
J. Holmström and S. Sawyer. Requirements engineering blinders: exploring information systems developers’ black-boxing of the emergent character of requirements. EJIS, 20(1):34–47, 2011.
M. Karow. Business Process Documentation in CreativeWork Systems. PhD thesis, University of Münster, Germany, 2011.
R. Knackstedt. Fachkonzeptionelle Referenzmodellierung einer Managementunterstützung mit quantiativen und qualitativen Daten. Methodische Konzepte zur Konstruktion und Anwendung. PhD thesis, University of Münster, Germany, 2006.
P. P. Maglio, S. L. Vargo, N. Caswell, and J. Spohrer. The service system is the basic abstraction of service science. Inf. Syst. E-Business Management, 7(4):395–406, 2009.
S. T. March and G. F. Smith. Design and natural science research on information technology. Decision Support Systems, 15(4):251 – 266, 1995.
D. L. Moody. Theoretical and practical issues in evaluating the quality of conceptual models: current state and future directions. Data Knowl. Eng., 55(3):243–276, 2005.
C. W. Morris. Foundations of the theory of signs. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, USA, 1938.
J. Mylopoulos. Information modeling in the time of the revolution. Inf. Syst., 23(3-4):127–155, 1998.
D. Pfeiffer. Semantic Business Process Analysis — Building Block-based Construction of Automatically Analyzable Business Process Models. PhD thesis, University of Münster, 2008.
J. Ralyté, C. Rolland, and R. Deneckère. Towards a meta-tool for change-centric method engineering: A typology of generic operators. In A. Persson and J. Stirna, editors, Advanced Information Systems Engineering, 16th International Conference, CAiSE 2004, Riga, Latvia, June 7-11, 2004, Proceedings, volume 3084 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 202–218. Springer, 2004.
M. Rossi, J.-P. Tolvanen, B. Ramesh, K. Lyytinen, and J. Kaipala. Method rationale in method engineering. In 33rd Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS- 33), 4-7 January, 2000, Maui, Hawaii, Track 2: Decision Technologies for Management. IEEE Computer Society, 2000.
H. Sackman. Delphi assessment: expert opinion, forecasting and group process. Technical Report AD0786878, Rand Corp., Santa Monica, CA, USA, Apr 1974.
R. C. Schmidt. Managing delphi surveys using nonparametric statistical techniques. Decision Sciences, 28(3):763–774, 1997.
K. Siau and M. Rossi. Evaluation techniques for systems analysis and design modelling methods — a review and comparative analysis. Inf. Syst. J., 21(3):249–268, 2011.
J. Spohrer, S. L. Vargo, N. Caswell, and P. P. Maglio. The service system is the basic abstraction of service science. In 41st Hawaii International International Conference on Systems Science (HICSS-41 2008), Proceedings, 7-10 January 2008, Waikoloa, Big Island, HI, USA, pages 1530–1605. IEEE Computer Society, 2008.
H. Stachowiak. Allgemeine Modelltheorie. Springer, Wien, 1973.
Y. Wand, D. E. Monarchi, J. Parsons, and C. C. Woo. Theoretical foundations for conceptual modelling in information systems development. Decision Support Systems, 15(4):285 – 304, 1995.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Matzner, M., Becker, J. (2012). Requirements for a Service Description Language — Findings from a Delphi Study. In: Barros, A., Oberle, D. (eds) Handbook of Service Description. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-1864-1_20
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-1864-1_20
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-1863-4
Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-1864-1
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)