Skip to main content

Supporting USDL by a Governance Framework

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Handbook of Service Description

Abstract

The previous chapter introduced service marketplaces as fundamental tool that enables and benefits service ecosystems. The application of service marketplaces for enterprise resource planning is a growing market. The operation of such an online marketplace requires a governance approach that lies adjacent to the requirements of a SOA and the more general governance of IT. It also has requirements of its own, especially when it comes to the description of services with languages such as USDL. In this chapter, we propose four building blocks as a basis for a governance framework that is capable of supporting the operation of a service marketplace. The research is based on existing frameworks and also takes into consideration the particularities of emerging SOA Governance approaches. We emphasize the processes required for the management of service descriptions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. SOA Governance: Beherrschen Sie Ihre SOA. Business white paper, Software AG,2005. http://www.softwareag.com/de/Images/WP_SOA_Governance_D_tcm17-22130.pdf.

  2. Service Lifecycle Governance: Timely Policies and Enforcement Help Companies Reap the Full Benefits of SOA. BEA white paper. BEA Systems, Inc., 2006. http://www.itworldcanada.com/Admin/Pages/Assets/DisplayAssetaspx?id=e0a24263-a10a-4887-8d45-582261587176.

  3. SOA Governance: Balancing Flexibility and Control Within an SOA. A systinet white paper, Systinet, 2006. http://www.webservices.org/content/download/83830/1225383/file/SOA_Gov906.pdf.

  4. SOA Governance: Enabling Sustainable Success with SOA. Technical report, webMethods, Inc., 2006. http://www.cioindex.com/nm/articlefiles/44428-SOA_Governance.pdf.

  5. 2007 Survey on SOA Governance. Technical report, WebLayers SOA Forum, 2007. http://www.bitpipe.com/detail/RES/1209665671_580.html.

  6. CObIT 4.1: Control Objectives for Information and Related Technology. Technical report, IT Governance Institute, Rolling Meadows, IL, USA, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  7. ITIL v3: Information Technology Infrastructure Library Version 3. Core OGC titles, Office of Governance Commerce, The Stationery Office, London, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  8. SOA Governance: Balancing Flexibility and Control within an SOA. Technical report, Hewlett-Packard, 2007. http://hp.com/go/soa.

  9. Five Steps for Building the Business Case for SOA Governance. Business white paper, Software AG, 2008. http://www.softwareag.com/de/images/BusCase_SOA_WP_Nov08-web_tcm17-45795.pdf.

  10. CMMI Models and Reports. Technical report, Software Engineering Institute, 2009. http://www.sei.cmu.edu/cmmi/models/.

  11. SOA Governance Framework. Technical standard, The Open Group, 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  12. TOGAF 9: The Open Group Architecture Framework. Technical report, The Open Group, 2009. http://www.opengroup.org/architecture/togaf9-doc/arch/index.html.

  13. M. Afshar. SOA Governance: Framework and Best Practices. An Oracle White Paper. An Oracle white paper, 2007. http://www.oracle.com/technologies/soa/docs/oracle-soa-governance-best-practices.pdf.

  14. PAllen. SOA Governance: Challenge or Opportunity? CEDI Journal, 7:20-31, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  15. A. Arsanjani and K. Holley. Increase Flexibility with the Service Integration Maturity Model (SIMM). Technical report, IBM developerWorks, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  16. A. P Barros and M. Dumas. The rise of web service ecosystems. IT Professional, 8(5):31-37, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  17. J. Bernhardt and D. Seese. A conceptual framework for the governance of service-oriented architectures. In G. Feuerlicht and W. Lamersdorf, editors, Service-Oriented Computing - ICSOC 2008 Workshops, ICSOC 2008 International Workshops, Sydney, Australia, December 1st, 2008, Revised Selected Papers, volume 5472 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 327-338. Springer, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  18. N. Bieberstein, S. Bose, M. Fiammante, K. Jones, and R. Shah. Service-oriented Architecture Compass: Business Value, Planning, and Enterprise Roadmap. IBM Press, Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  19. N. Bieberstein, S. Bose, L. Walker, and A. Lynch. Impact of service-oriented architecture on enterprise systems, organizational structures, and individuals. IBM Systems Journal, 44(4):691-708, 2005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. J. Bloomberg. SOA Governance: IT Governance in the Context of Service Orientation. Zap Think, LLC, Baltimore, MD, USA, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  21. B. Brauer and S. Kline. SOA governance:a key ingredient of the adaptive enterprise. Whitepaper, HP, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  22. W. Brown, R. Laird, C. Gee, and T. Mitra. SOA Governance: Achieving and Sustaining Business and IT Agility. IBM Press, Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  23. P Derler and R. Weinreich. Models and Tools for SOA Governance. In D. Draheim and G. Weber, editors, Trends in Enterprise Application Architecture, 2nd International Conference, TEAA 2006, Berlin, Germany, November 29- December I, 2006, Revised Selected Pa pers, volume 4473 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 112-126. Springer, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  24. T. Erl. Service-oriented Architecture: Concepts, Technalogy, and Design. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  25. D. Herron and D. Garmus. Identifying your organization's best practices. CrossTalk: Journal of Defense Software Engineering, 19:22-25, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  26. K. Holley, J. Palistrant, and S. Graham. Effective SOA Governance. IBM White Paper, 2006. ftp://ftp.software.ibm.com/software/uk/flexible/wp/effective_soa_governance.pdf.

  27. C. Janiesch, M. Niemann, and R. Steinmetz. The TEXO Governance Framework. Technical report, SAP Research White Paper, 2011. http://www.internet-of-services.com.

  28. W. Johannsen and M. Goeken. Referen:mwdelle für IT-Govemance: Strategische Effektivitd.tund Effizienz mit CO BIT,ITIL & Co. dpunkt, Heidelberg, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  29. N. Josuttis. SOA in Practice: The Art of Distributed System Design. O'Reilly Media, Sebastopol, CA, USA, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  30. R. Kaplan and D. Norton. Translating Strategy into Action: The Balanced Scorecard. Harvard Business School, Boston, MA, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  31. O. Kohnke, T. Scheffler, and C. Hock. SOA-Governance-Ein Ansatz zum Management serviceorientierter Architekturen. Wirtschaftsinformatik, 50(5):408-412, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  32. E. Marks. Service-Oriented Architecture Govemancefor the Services Driven Enterprise. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  33. M. Matsumara. The Definitive Guide to SOA Governance and Lifecycle Management. Technical report, 2007. http://www.scribd.com/doc/7056416/Guide-to-SOA-Governance.

  34. G. McBride. The Role of SOA Quality Management in SOA Service Lifecycle Management. IBM developerWorks, 2007. ftp://ftp.software.ibm.com/software/rational/web/articles/soa_quality.pdf.

  35. T. Mitra. A Case for SOA Governance. IBM developerWorks, 2005. http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/webservices/library/ws-soa-govern/.

  36. B. Moreland and M. Afshar. The Path to SOA (Part I of III). http://www.ebizq.net/topics/systems_management/features/7193.html, 2006.

  37. M. Muriankara. SOA Governance Framework and Solution Architecture. IBM de-veloperWorks, 2008. http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/webservices/library/ws-soa-govframe/.

  38. A. Picot, R. Reichwald, and R. Wigand. Die grenzenlose Untemehmung: Information, Organisation und Management. Gabler, Wiesbaden, 4th edition, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  39. A. Pugsley. Assessing your SOA Program. HP White Paper, Hewlett Packard, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  40. J. Quantz. SOAin der Praxis: Wie Unternehmen SOA erfolgreich einsetzen. Berlecon report, BerleCon Research, Mar 2006. http://www.berlecon.de/studien/downloads/Berlecon_SOA.pdf.

  41. D. Rane and G. Lomow. SOA Governance:More than just Registries and Repositories. Technical report, BearingPoint, 2008. http://www.digitalgovernment.com/media/Knowledge-Centers/asset_upload_file77_1753.pdf.

  42. I. Rieger and R. Bruns. SOA-Govemance und -Rollen: Sichern des Mehrwerts einer serviceorientierten Architektur. pages 20-24, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  43. J. Schelp, 0. Schmitz, J. Schulz, and M. Stutz. Governance des IT-Sourcing bei einem Finanzdienstleister. HMD- Praxis Wirtschaftsinform., 250, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  44. T. G. J. Schepers, M.-E. Iacob, and P. van Eck. A lifecycle approach to SOA governance. In R. L. Wainwright and H. Haddad, editors, Proceedings of the 2008 ACM Symposium on Applied Computing (SAC), Fortaleza, Ceara, Brazil, March 16-20, 2008, pages 1055-1061. ACM, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  45. B. Schmid. Elektronische Markte: Merkmale, Organisation und Potentiale. In A. Hermanns and M. Sauter, editors, Management-Handbuch Electronic Commerce: Grundlagen, Strategien, Praxisbeispiele. Vahlen, Munich, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  46. I. Sommerville. Software Engineering. Addison-Wesley, Harlow, 8th edition, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  47. A. S. Vedamuthu, D. Orchard, F. Hirsch, M. Hondo, P. Yendluri, T. Boubez, and U. Yalcinalp. Web services policy 1.5 -framework. W3C Recommendation, http://www.w3.org/TR/ws-policy/2007.

  48. P Weill and J. Ross. IT Governance: How Top Performers Manage IT Decision Rig hts for Superior Results. Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA, USA, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  49. P Windley. Governing SOA. InfoWorld.com, Jan 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  50. P Windley. SOA Governance: Rules of the Game. InfoWorld.com, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  51. P Windley. Teaming up for SOA. InfoWorld.com, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  52. B. Woolf. Introduction to SOA Governance. IBM developerWorks, 2007. http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/library/ar-servgov/.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christian Janiesch .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Janiesch, C., Niemann, M. (2012). Supporting USDL by a Governance Framework. In: Barros, A., Oberle, D. (eds) Handbook of Service Description. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-1864-1_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-1864-1_16

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-1863-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-1864-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics