Skip to main content

Representing USDL for Humans and Tools

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

This chapter deals with technical aspects of how USDL service descriptions can be read from and written to different representations for use by humans and tools. A combination of techniques for representing and exchanging USDL have been drawn from Model-Driven Engineering and Semantic Web technologies. The USDL language’s structural definition is specified as a MOF meta-model, but some modules were originally defined using the OWL language from the Semantic Web community and translated to the meta-model format. We begin with the important topic of serializing USDL descriptions into XML, so that they can be exchanged between editors, repositories, and other tools. The following topic is how USDL can be made available through the Semantic Web as a network of linked data, connected via URIs. Finally, consideration is given to human-readable representations of USDL descriptions, and how they can be generated, in large part, from the contents of a stored USDL model.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. B. Adida, M. Birbeck, S. McCarron, and S. Pemberton. RDFa in XHTML: Syntax and Processing. http://www.w3.org/TR/rdfa-syntax/, October 2008.

  2. J. F. Allen. Maintaining knowledge about temporal intervals. Communications of the ACM, 26(11):832-843, 1983.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. C. Baumann and C. Loes. Formalizing copyright for the internet of services. In G. Kot­ sis, D. Taniar, E. Pardede, I. Saleh, and I. Khalil, editors, iiWAS'2010 - The 12th International Conference on Information Integration and Web-based Applications and Services, 8-10 November 2010, Paris, France, pages 714-721. ACM, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  4. C. Bizer, T. Heath, and T. Berners-Lee. Linked data - the story so far. Int. J. Semantic Web Inj. Syst., 5(3):1-22, 2009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. D. Brickley and R. V. Guha. RDF Vocabulary Description Language 1.0: RDF Schema, 2002. http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-schema.

  6. D. Brickley and L. Miller. FOAF Vocabulary Specification 0.98. http://xrulns.com/foaf/spec/, August 2010. Last Visited:July 2011.

  7. J. Clark and S. DeRose. XML Path Language (XPath) Version 1.0. Recommendation, W3C, November 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  8. M. Dean, G. Schreiber, S. Bechhofer, F. van Hannelen, J. Hendler, I. Horrocks, D. McGuin­ ness, P. F. Patel-Schneider, and L. A Stein. OWL Web Ontology Language Reference. http://www.w3.org/TR/ow1-ref/, February 2004. Last Visited: March 2005.

  9. T. Heath and C. Bizer. Linked Data: Evolving the Web into a Global Data Space, volume 1 of Synthesis Lectures on the Semantic Web: Theory and Technology. Morgan & Claypool, 1st edition edition, 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  10. M. Hepp. Goodrelations: An ontology for describing products and services offers on the web. In 16th International Conference on Knowledge Engineering and Knowledge Management (EKAW2008), volume 5268 of LNCS,pages 332-347, Acitrezza, Italy, October 2008. Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  11. J. R. Hobbs and F. Pan. Time Ontology in OWL. Available at http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-time/, September 2006.

  12. R. Iannella, H. Halpin, R. Iannella, B. Suda, and N. Walsh. Representing vcard objects in rdf. Member submission, W3C, January 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  13. ISO. Information technology- Document Schema Definition Languages (DSDL)- Part 3: Rule-based validation- Schematron. ISO/IEC 19757-3, June 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  14. I. Jacobs and N. Walsh. Architecture of the world wide web, volume one. Recommendation, W3C, December 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  15. T. Kiemes and D. Oberle. Generic modeling and management of price plans in the internet of services. In K.-P. Famrich and B. Franczyk, editors, Informatik 2010: Service Science- N eue Perspektivenfur die Informatik, Beitrage der 40. Jahrestagung der GesellschaftfUr Iriformatik e.V (GI), Band I, 27.09. - 1.10.2010, Leipzig, volume 175 of LNI, pages 533-538. GI, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  16. J. Lieberman, R. Singh, and C. Goad. W3c geospatial vocabulary. Incubator group report, W3C, October 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  17. D. Martin, M. Burstein, J. Hobbs, 0. Lassila, D. McDermott, S. Mcllraith, S. Narayanan, M. Paolucci, B. Parsia, T. Payne, E. Sirin, N. Srinivasan, and K. Sycara. OWL-S: Semantic Markup for Web Services. Member submission, W3C, 2004. W3C Member Submission 22 November 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  18. A Miles and S. Bechhofer. SKOS Simple Knowledge Organization System Reference. Recommendation, W3C, August 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Object Management Group. Meta Object Facility (MOP) Core Specification Version 2.4. OMG Document No. formal/2008-12-10, December 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  20. B. Pandit, V. Popescu, and V. Smith. Service modeling language interchange format, version 1.1. Recommendation, W3C, May 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  21. B. Pandit, V. Popescu, and V. Smith. Service modeling language, version 1.1. Recommendation, W3C, May 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  22. C. Pedrinaci, D. Liu, M. Maleshkova, D. Lambert, J. Kopecky, and J. Domingue. iServe: a Linked Services Publishing Platform. In Proceedings of Ontology Repositories and Editors for the Semantic Web at 7th ESWC, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  23. V. Presutti. Part whole design pattern.

    Google Scholar 

  24. A Rector, C. Welty, N. Noy, and E. Wallace. Simple part-whole relations in owl ontologies. Editor's draft, W3C, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  25. D. Reynolds. An organization ontology. http://www.epimorphics.com/public/vocabulary/org.html, October 2010.

  26. Richard Soley. Model Driven Architecture. OMG Document No. formal/2000-11-05, November 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  27. P van Eck, J. Gordijn, and R. Wieringa. Value-based design of collaboration processes for e-commerce. In 2004 IEEE International Conference on e-Technology, e-Commerce, and e-Services (EEE 04), 29-31 March 2004, Taipei, Taiwan, pages 349- 358. IEEE Computer Society, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  28. T. Vitvar, J. Kopecky, J. Viskova, and D. Fensel. WSMO-Lite Annotations for Web Services. In M. Hauswirth, M. Koubarakis, and S. Bechhofer, editors, Proceedings if the 5th European Semantic Web Conference, LNCS, Berlin Heidelberg, June 2008. Springer Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Keith Duddy .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Duddy, K. et al. (2012). Representing USDL for Humans and Tools. In: Barros, A., Oberle, D. (eds) Handbook of Service Description. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-1864-1_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-1864-1_14

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-1863-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-1864-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics