Robust Stabilization and Disturbance Attenuation of Switched Linear Parameter-Varying Systems in Discrete Time

  • Ji-Woong Lee
  • Geir E. Dullerud


Nonconservative analysis of discrete-time switched linear parameter-varying systems is achieved via switching path-dependent Lyapunov and Kalman–Yakubovich–Popov inequalities. Exact convex conditions for the synthesis of a class of state-feedback controllers are then expressed in terms of nested unions of linear matrix inequalities. The resulting controllers are robust in the sense that their coefficients depend solely on a finite number of the most recent past modes and parameters, but not on the current mode or parameter.


Linear Matrix Inequality Mode Sequence Disturbance Attenuation Switch Linear System Active Magnetic Bearing 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. 1.
    Apkarian P, Gahinet P (1995) A convex characterization of gain-scheduled H controllers. IEEE Trans Automat Contr 40(5):853–864MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Blanchini F, Miani S (2003) Stabilization of LPV systems: state feedback, state estimation, and duality. SIAM J Contr Optim 42(1):76–97MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Daafouz J, Bernussou J (2001) Parameter dependent Lyapunov functions for discrete time systems with time varying parametric uncertainties. Syst Contr Lett 43(5):355–359MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    de Oliveira MC, Bernussou J, Geromel JC (1999) A new discrete-time robust stability condition. Syst Contr Lett 37(4):261–265MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Dullerud GE, Lall S (1999) A new approach for analysis and synthesis of time-varying systems. IEEE Trans Automat Contr 44(8):1486–1497MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lee J-W (2006) On uniform stabilization of discrete-time linear parameter-varying control systems. IEEE Trans Automat Contr 51(10):1714–1721CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lee J-W, Dullerud GE (2006) Optimal disturbance attenuation for discrete-time switched and Markovian jump linear systems. SIAM J Contr Optim 45(4):1329–1358MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lee J-W, Dullerud GE (2006) Uniform stabilization of discrete-time switched and Markovian jump linear systems. Automatica 42(2):205–218MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lescher F, Zhao JY, Borne P (2006) Switching LPV controllers for a variable speed pitch regulated wind turbine. Int J Comp Commun Contr 1(4):73–84Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lim S, How JP (2003) Modeling and H control for switched linear parameter-varying missile autopilot. IEEE Trans Contr Syst Technol 11(6):830–838CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lu B, Wu F (2004) Switching LPV control designs using multiple parameter-dependent Lyapunov functions. Automatica 40(11):1973–1980MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lu B, Wu F, Kim SW (2006) Switching LPV control of an F-16 aircraft via controller state reset. IEEE Trans Contr Syst Technol 14(2):267–277CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Shamma JS, Athans M (1991) Guaranteed properties of gain scheduled control for linear parameter-varying plants. Automatica 27(3):559–564MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Zhang L, Shi P (2008) 2 −  model reduction for switched LPV systems with average-dwell time. IEEE Trans Automat Contr 53(10):2443–2448MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Zhang L, Shi P, Boukas EK, Wang C (2006) H control of switched linear discrete-time systems with polytopic uncertainties. Optim Contr Applicat Meth 27(5):273–291MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Electrical EngineeringThe Pennsylvania State UniversityUniversity ParkUSA
  2. 2.Department of Mechanical Science and EngineeringThe University of Illinois at Urbana-ChampaignUrbanaUSA

Personalised recommendations