Skip to main content

Higher Education and Postindustrial Society: New Ideas About Teaching, Learning, and Technology

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Next Generation of Distance Education

Abstract

Online learning offers the opportunity to examine and rethink the teaching and learning enterprise in education broadly. Online learning can be conceived of as the new distance education, where issues such as interaction and dialogue are introduced back into the distance education model. However, regardless of education delivery mode—face-to-face, online, distance, or some combination through blended learning—teaching (and learning) is changing. Online learning, whether synchronous or asynchronous, offers a range of pedagogical practices previously unavailable in both distance and face-to-face higher education.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Aslanian, C. B. (2001). Adult students today. New York: The College Board.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beaudoin, M. F. (2003). Distance education leadership: An appraisal of research and practice. In M. G. Moore & W. G. Anderson (Eds.), Handbook of distance education (pp. 519–530). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • CCI Research Inc. (2009). Measures of student engagement in postsecondary education: Theoretical basis and applicability to Ontario’s colleges. Toronto: Higher Education Quality Council of Ontario. Retrieved from January 5, 2012 http://www.ontla.on.ca/library/repository/mon/23008/294772.pdf.

  • Chickering, A., & Ehrmann, S. E. (1996). Implementing the seven principles: Technology as lever. AAHE Bulletin, October, pp. 3–6. Retrieved from April, 2009 http://www.tltgroup.org/programs/seven.html.

  • Chickering, A. W., & Gamson, Z. F. (1987). Seven principles of good practice in undergraduate education. American Association for Higher Education Bulletin, 39(March), 3–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cleveland-Innes, M., & Emes, C. (2005). Principles of a learner centered curriculum: Responding to the call for change in higher education. Canadian Journal of Higher Education, 35(4), 85–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cleveland-Innes, M. F., & Garrison, D. R. (Eds.). (2010). An introduction to distance education: Understanding teaching and learning in a new era. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Entwistle, N. J. (2000). Approaches to studying and levels of understanding: The influences of teaching and assessment. In J. C. Smart (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (pp. 156–218). New York: Agathon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, T., & Nation, D. (2003). Globalization and the reinvention of distance education. In M. G. Moore & W. G. Anderson (Eds.), Handbook of distance education (pp. 777–792). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garrison, D. R. (2000). Theoretical challenges for distance education in the 21st century: A shift from structural to transactional issues. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 1(1), 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garrison, D. R. (2007). Online community of inquiry review: Social, cognitive, and teaching presence issues. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 11(1), 61–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2001). Critical thinking, cognitive presence, and computer conferencing in distance education. American Journal of Distance Education, 15(1), 7–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garrison, D. R., & Cleveland-Innes, M. (2010). Conclusion. In M. F. Cleveland-Innes & D. R. Garrison (Eds.), An introduction to distance education: Understanding teaching and learning in a new era (pp. 137–164). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garrison, D. R., & Vaughan, N. (2008). Blended learning in higher education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant, M. R., & Thornton, H. R. (2007). Best practices in undergraduate adult-centered online learning: Mechanisms for course design and delivery. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 3(4), 346–362. Retrieved from http://jolt.merlot.org/vol3no4/grant.htm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gudea, S. R. (2008). Expectations and demands in online teaching: Practical experiences. Pennsylvania: IGI Publishing.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gumport, P., & Chun, M. (2005). The states and higher education. In P. Altbach et al. (Eds.), American higher education in the 21st century (pp. 393–424). Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ice, P. (2010). The future of learning technologies: Transformational developments. In M. F. Cleveland-Innes & D. R. Garrison (Eds.), An introduction to distance education: Understanding teaching and learning in a new era (pp. 137–164). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ickenberry, S. (2001). Forward. In C. Latchem & D. Hanna (Eds.), Leadership for 21st century learning: Global perspectives from educational perspectives. Sterling: Stylus Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanuka, H., & Brooks, C. (2010). Distance education in a post-Fordist time: Negotiating difference. In M. F. Cleveland-Innes & D. R. Garrison (Eds.), An introduction to distance education: Understanding teaching and learning in a new era (pp. 69–90). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keller, G. (2008). Higher education and the new society. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuh, G. D. (2003). What we’re learning about student engagement from NSSE: Benchmarks for effective educational practices. Change, 35(2), 24–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore, M. G. (1991). Editorial: Distance education theory. American Journal of Distance Education, 5(3), 1–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newlin, M. H., & Wang, A. Y. (2002). Integrating technology and pedagogy: Web instruction and seven principles of undergraduate education. Teaching of Psychology, 29(4), 325–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pond, W. K. (2003). Lifelong learning—The changing face of higher education. eLearning Summit. La Quinta Resort, California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants. On the Horizon, 9(5), 1–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramsden, P. (2003). Learning to teach in higher education (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, J. C., & Swan, K. (2003). Examining social presence in online courses in relation to students’ perceived learning and satisfaction. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 7(1), 68–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rourke, L., & Kanuka, H. (2007). Barriers to online critical discourse. Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 2, 105–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shale, D. (2010). Beyond boundaries: The evolution of distance education. In M. F. Cleveland-Innes & D. R. Garrison (Eds.), An introduction to distance education: Understanding teaching and learning in a new era (pp. 91–107). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swan, K. (2002). Immediacy, social presence, and asynchronous discussion. In J. Bourne & J. C. Moore (Eds.), Elements of quality online education (Vol. 3, pp. 157–172). Needham: Sloan Center for Online Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swan, K. (2010). Teaching and learning in post-industrial distance education. In M. F. Cleveland-Innes & D. R. Garrison (Eds.), An introduction to distance education: Understanding teaching and learning in a new era (pp. 108–135). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swan, K., Shen, J., & Hiltz, S. R. (2006). Assessment and collaboration in online learning. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 10(1), 45–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Twigg, C. (2001). Innovations in online learning. Moving beyond no significant difference. The PEW Learning and Technology Program. (symposium monograph). Troy, NY: Center for Academic Transformation. Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Twigg, C. A. (2003). Improving learning and reducing costs: New models of online learning. Educause Review, 38, 28–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of Education. (2009). Evaluation of evidence-based practices in online learning. Retrieved from May, 2010 http://www.ed.gov/rschstat/eval/tech/evidence-based-practices/finalreport.pdf.

  • Webster’s Collegiate Dictionary. (2002). Springfield, Mass.: Merriam Webster Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zemsky, R., Wegner, G. R., & Massy, W. P. (2005). Remaking the American university: Market-smart and mission-centered. Piscataway: Rutgers University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Martha Cleveland-Innes Ph.D .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Cleveland-Innes, M., Garrison, D.R. (2012). Higher Education and Postindustrial Society: New Ideas About Teaching, Learning, and Technology. In: Moller, L., Huett, J. (eds) The Next Generation of Distance Education. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-1785-9_15

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics