Gang Member: Who Says? Definitional and Structural Issues



Owing to a number of high-profile shootings in the UK over the past decade, there has been a significant amount of media and political interest in youth gangs. This chapter reports on a study conducted in 2009 in a large city in the North of England. It discusses the structure and formation of gangs in this city from the view of the young people identified as gang members and those responsible for this identification, i.e., police officers. Findings demonstrated that few of the young people viewed themselves as belonging to a gang; indeed, many were scathing of such an attribution, contesting its applicability. A more accurate description of these young people is of a rather loose and fluid, interlinked but informal social network of friends and associates. There was evidence that the authorities’ labeling of some young people as gang members and adoption and use of gang names attributed coherence and identity to what was often only fluid and transitional youth group formations. This may have created the very circumstances it sought to challenge.


Young People Police Officer Young Person Family Firm Gang Member 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Aldridge J, Medina J (2008) Youth gangs in an English city: social exclusion, drugs and violence. University of Manchester. Research report ESRC RES-000–23–0615. 16–01–2008Google Scholar
  2. Alexander C (2008) Re-thinking “gangs”. Report prepared for the Runnymeade Trust. Retrieved from
  3. Bennett T, Holloway K (2004) Gang membership, drugs and crime in the UK. Br J Criminol 44:305–323CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bullock K, Tilley N (2002) Shootings, gangs and violent incidents in Manchester: developing a crime reduction strategy. Crime reduction research series paper 13, Home Office, LondonGoogle Scholar
  5. Decker SH (2001) The impact of organizational features on gang activities and relationships. In: Klein MW, Kerner HJ, Maxson CL, Weitekamp EGM (eds) The Eurogang paradox: street gangs and youth groups in the U.S. and Europe. Kluwer Academic Publishers, London, pp 21–39Google Scholar
  6. Decker S, Kempf-Leonard K (1991) Constructing gangs: the social definition of youth activities. Crim Just Policy Rev 5:271CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Ekblom P (1999) Can we make crime prevention adaptive by learning from other evolutionary struggles. Stud Crime Crime Prevent 8:27–51 (Cited in M. Felson (2006) Crime and Nature. Thousand Oaks: Sage)Google Scholar
  8. Esbensen F-A, Weerman FM (2005) Youth gangs and troublesome youth groups in the United States and the Netherlands: a cross national comparison. Eur J Criminol 2:5–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hallsworth S, Young T (2008) Gang talk and gang talkers: a critique. Crime, Media, Culture 4:175–195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. HM Inspectorate of Prisons (2010) The management of gang issues among children and young people in prison custody and the community: a joint thematic review. HM Inspectorate of Prisons, LondonGoogle Scholar
  11. Hobbs D (2001) The firm: organizational logic and the criminal culture on a shifting terrain. Br J Criminol 4:549–560CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Howell JC (2007) Menacing or mimicking? Realities of youth gangs. Juvenile Fam Court 58:39–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kemshall H, Mackenzie G, Wood J, Bailey R, Yates, J (2005) Strengthening multi-agency public protection arrangements (MAPPAs). Home Office Development and Practice Report. Home Office, LondonGoogle Scholar
  14. Kintrea K, Bannister J, Pickering J, Reid M, Suzuki N (2008) Young people and territoriality in British cities. Joseph Rowntree Foundation, LondonGoogle Scholar
  15. Klein M (2001) Resolving the Eurogang paradox. In: Klein MW, Kerner HJ, Maxson CL, Weitekamp EGM (eds) The Eurogang paradox: street gangs and youth groups in the US and Europe. Kluwer Academic Publishers, LondonGoogle Scholar
  16. Klein MW, Maxson CL (2006) Street gang patterns and policies. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  17. Klein MW, Weerman F, Thornberry TP (2006) Street gang violence in Europe. Eur J Criminol 3:413–437CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Mares D (2001) Gangstas or lager louts? Working class street gangs in Manchester. In: Klein MW, Kerner H-J, Maxson C, Weitekamp EGM (eds) The paradox: street gangs and youth groups in the U.S. and Europe. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 153–164Google Scholar
  19. Office H (2004) Delinquent youth groups and offending behaviour: findings from the 2004 offending, crime and justice survey. HMSO, LondonGoogle Scholar
  20. Office H (2008) Tackling gangs: a practical guide for local authorities, CDRPs and other local partners. HMSO, LondonGoogle Scholar
  21. Ralphs R, Medina J, Aldridge J (2009) Who needs enemies with friends like these? The importance of place for young people living in known gang areas. J Youth Stud 12:483–500CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Stelfox P (1998) Policing lower levels of organised crime in England and Wales. Howard J 37:393–406CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. The Centre for Social Justice (2009) Dying to belong: an in-depth review of street gangs in Britain. The Centre for Social Justice, LondonGoogle Scholar
  24. Weerman FM, Maxson CL, Esbensen F, Aldridge J, Medina J, Gemert F (2009) Eurogang program manual: background, development, and use of the instruments in multi-site, multi-method comparative research. Retrieved from
  25. Youth Justice Board (2007) Groups, gangs and weapons. Youth Justice Board, LondonGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hannah Smithson
    • 1
  • Leanne Monchuk
    • 2
  • Rachel Armitage
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of SociologyManchester Metropolitan UniversityManchesterUK
  2. 2.Applied Criminology CentreUniversity of HuddersfieldHuddersfieldUK

Personalised recommendations