Abstract
In this chapter, we reflect on the utility of the Eurogang definition across a number of research projects in which it has been employed. We suggest that “street orientation” aspect of the definition might more properly be considered a descriptive—rather than defining—criterion, and raise validity concerns in relation to the key aspect of the Eurogang definition: that the group’s “involvement in illegal activity” is part of its “group identity.” In particular, using case studies, we describe three types of delinquent youth group that we argue should not be considered gangs, but which would be using the Eurogang definition. Finally, we raise for discussion and debate the possibility for an alternative definitional criterion: that gangs are groups with a reputation for violence or its threat, even if rarely enacted.
This research was supported in part by a grant from the UK Economic and Social Research Council (RES-000-23-0615).
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Aldridge J, Medina J (2008) Youth gangs in an English city: social exclusion, drugs and violence (No. ESRC RES-000–23–0615)
Aldridge J, Medina J, Ralphs R (2008) Dangers and problems of doing ‘gang’ research in the UK. In: van Gemert F, Peterson D, Lien I-L (eds) Street gangs, migration and ethnicity. Willan, Cullompton, pp 31–46
Aldridge J, Shute J, Ralphs R, Medina J (2009) Blame the parents? Challenges for parent-focussed programmes for families of gang-involved young people. Child Soc 25:371–381
Aldridge J, Measham F, Williams L (2011a). Routledge, London
Aldridge J, Ralphs R, Medina J (2011b) Collateral damage: gang territory and policing in an English city. In: Goldson B (ed) Youth in crisis? ‘Gangs’, territoriality and violence. Routledge, London, pp 72–88
Decker SH, Van Winkle B (1996) Life in the gang. Cambridge University Press, New York
Erikson EH (1963) Childhood and society. Norton, New York
Esbensen FA, Weerman FM (2005) Youth gangs and troublesome youth groups in the United States and the Netherlands: a cross-national comparison. Eur J Criminol 2:5
Hennigan KM, Spanovic M (2012) Gang dynamics through the lens of social identity theory. In: Esbensen FA, Maxson CL (eds) Youth gangs in international perspective: tales from the Eurogang program of research. Springer, New York
Klein MW, Maxson CL (2006) Street gang patterns and policies. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Maher, J (2007) Angels with dirty faces: youth gangs and troublesome youth groups in South Wales. PhD thesis, University of Glamorgan
Matsuda KN, Esbensen FA, Carson DC (2012) Putting the “gang” in “Eurogang”: characteristics of delinquent youth groups by different definitional approaches. In: Esbensen FA, Maxson CL (eds) Youth gangs in international perspective: tales from the Eurogang program of research. Springer, New York
Matza D (1964) Delinquency and drift. Wiley, New York
Maxson CL, Klein M (1995) Investigating gang structures. J Gang Res 3:33–40
Medina J, Ralphs R, Aldridge J (2010) Mentoring siblings of gang members: a template for reaching families of gang members? Child Soc. doi:10.1111/j.1099-0860.2010.00307.x, Online First
Medina J, Aldridge J, Ralphs R (2011) Gang transformation, changes or demise: evidence from an English city. In: Hazen JM, Rodgers D (eds) Global gangs: comparative perspectives. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis
Omole T (2011) Drug use. In: Fuller E (ed) Smoking, drinking and drug use among young people in England in 2010. Information Centre for Health and Social Care, London, NATCEN
Ralphs R, Medina J, Aldridge J (2009) Who needs enemies with friends like these? The importance of place for young people living in known gang areas. J Youth Stud 12:483–500
Sharp C, Aldridge J, Medina J (2006) Delinquent youth groups and offending behaviour: findings from the 2004 offending, crime and justice survey. Home Office, London
Shiner M, Newburn T (1997) Definitely, maybe not? The normalisation of recreational drug use amongst young people. Sociology 31:511–529
Tajfel H (1978) Differentiation between social groups. Academic, London
Thrasher F (1927) The gang. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Tita GE, Cohen J, Engberg J (2005) An ecological study of the location of gang “set space”. Soc Probl 52:272–299
Vigil JD (1988) Group processes and street identity: adolescent chicano gang members. Ethos 16:421–445
Vigil JD (2002) A rainbow of gangs, street cultures in the mega-city. University of Texas Press, Austin
Weerman F, Maxson CL, Esbensen FA, Aldridge J, Medina J, Van Gemert F (2009) Eurogang Program Manual: Background, development, and use of the Eurogang instruments in multi-site, multi-method comparative research. http://www.umsl.edu/~ccj/eurogang/Eurogang_20Manual.pdf
Wood J, Alleyne E (2010) Street gang theory and research: where are we now and where do we go from here? Aggress Violent Behav 15:100–111
Yablonsky L (1960) The violent gang. Commentary 30:125–130
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Aldridge, J., Medina-Ariz, J., Ralphs, R. (2012). Counting Gangs: Conceptual and Validity Problems with the Eurogang Definition. In: Esbensen, FA., Maxson, C. (eds) Youth Gangs in International Perspective. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-1659-3_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-1659-3_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-1658-6
Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-1659-3
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawSocial Sciences (R0)