Advertisement

The Intersection of Gang Definition and Group Process: Concluding Observations

  • Cheryl L. Maxson
  • Finn-Aage Esbensen
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter advances an argument that the issues of street gang definition and group process are more closely related than anticipated. We provide the context for the selection and timeliness of these themes in comparative gang studies. As we discuss the contributions of the foregoing chapters, we reflect on the intersection of these themes insofar as aspects of group process can determine what groups get defined as street gangs. Moreover, components of gang definitions—the basic elements that comprise the way in which we understand street gangs—engage a focus on group process. We consider the implications of this work for directing further research and activity in the Eurogang Program of Research.

Keywords

Group Identity Group Process Gang Member Youth Group Gang Membership 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Decker SH (1996) Collective and normative features of gang violence. Justice Q 13:243–264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Decker SH, Curry GD (2000) Addressing key feature of gang membership: measuring the involvement of young members. J Crim Just 28:473–482CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Decker SH, van Winkle B (1996) Life in the gang: family, friends, and violence. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  4. Fleisher M (1998) Dead end kids: gang girls and the boys they know. University of Wisconsin Press, MadisonGoogle Scholar
  5. Hagedorn JM (1988) People and folks: gangs, crime, and the underclass in a rustbelt city. Lake View, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  6. Huizinga D, Schumann KF (2001) Gang membership in bremen and Denver: comparative longitudinal data. In: Klein MW, Kerner H-J, Maxson CL, Weitekamp EGM (eds) The Eurogang paradox: street gangs and youth groups in the U.S. and Europe. Kluwer, NorwellGoogle Scholar
  7. Huff RC (1989) Youth gangs and public policy. Crime Delinq 35:524–537CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Klein MW (1971) Street gangs and street workers. Prentice-Hall, Englewood CliffsGoogle Scholar
  9. Klein MW (1995) The American street gang: its nature, prevalence, and control. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  10. Klein MW (2001) Resolving the Eurogang paradox. In: Klein MW, Kerner H-J, Maxson CL, Weitekamp EGM (eds) The Eurogang paradox: street gangs and youth groups in the U.S. and Europe. Kluwer, NorwellGoogle Scholar
  11. Klein MW, Maxson CL (2006) Street gang patterns and policies. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  12. Maxson CL, Klein MW (1996) Defining gang homicide: an updated look at member and motive approaches. In: Huff CR (ed) Gangs in America, 2nd edn. Sage Publications, Thousand OaksGoogle Scholar
  13. Miller J (2001) One of the guys: girls, gangs and gender. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  14. Miller W (1973) Race, sex, and gangs: the Molls. Society 11:32–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Moore JW, Vigil JD (1989) Chicano gangs: group norms and individual factors related to adult criminality. Aztlan 18:31–42Google Scholar
  16. Short JF (1996) Gangs and adolescent violence. University of Colorado, Center for the Study and Prevention of Violence, BoulderGoogle Scholar
  17. Short JF, Strodtbeck FL (1965) Group process and gang delinquency. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  18. Spergel IA (1966) Street gang work: theory and practice. Addison-Wesley Publishing Co., ReadingGoogle Scholar
  19. Vigil JD (1988) Barrio gangs: street life and identity in southern California. University of Texas Press, AustinGoogle Scholar
  20. Zatz MS, Portillos EI (2000) Voices from the barrio: Chicano/a gangs, families, and communities. Criminology 38:369–401CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Criminology, Law and SocietyUniversity of CaliforniaIrvineUSA
  2. 2.Department of Criminology and Criminal JusticeUniversity of Missouri-St. LouisSt. LouisUSA

Personalised recommendations