Skip to main content

Predictability and Specification in Models of Exchange Rate Determination

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Recent Advances and Future Directions in Causality, Prediction, and Specification Analysis

Abstract

We examine a class of popular structural models of exchange rate determination and compare them to a random walk with and without drift. Given almost any set of conditioning variables, we find parametric specifications fail. Our findings are based on a broad entropy function of the whole distribution of variables and forecasts. We also find significant evidence of nonlinearity and/or “higher moment” influences which seriously questions the habit of forecast and model evaluation based on mean-variance criteria. Taylor rule factors may improve out of sample “forecasts” for some models and exchanges, but do not offer similar improvement for in-sample (historical) fit. We estimate models of exchange rate determination nonparametrically so as to avoid functional form issues. Taylor rule and some other variables are smoothed out, being statistically irrelevant in sample. The metric entropy tests suggest significant differences between the observed densities and their in- and out- of sample forecasts and fitted values. Much like the Diebold-Mariano approach, we are able to report statistical significance of the differences with our more general measures of forecast performance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    It might be interesting to evaluate the performance of the “hybrid” model by using the metric entropy criterion, but we leave that to future studies.

  2. 2.

    The detailed information about the structural models and the out-of-sample forecasting methodology will be provided in the following section.

  3. 3.

    Meese and Rogoff (1983) also uses monthly data in their chapter, while some studies such as Engel and West (2005); Cheung et al. (2005), and Gourinchas and Rey (2007) use quarterly data.

  4. 4.

    Variables in parentheses denote the foreign country counterparts.

  5. 5.

    See Molodtsova and Papell (2009) and Wang and Wu (2010) for the derivation of the models. A specification search approach to these models may be a worthy topic of research. The appropriate approach in that setting would be the data snooping techniques proposed by White (2000) in which no model may be correctly specified. This realism is an enduring aspect of techniques developed by Hal White. The object of inference in such settings would be the “pseudo parameters” which are afforded a compelling and clear definition based on entropy concepts such as the ones employed in this chapter.

  6. 6.

    Rogoff and Stavrakeva (2008) argue that CW test statistics cannot be used to evaluate forecasting performance as it is not testing the null of equal predictive accuracy, hence they suggest to use bootstrapped critical values. There is less evidence in favor of Taylor-rule based models when CW test statistics with bootstrapped critical values are used.

  7. 7.

    Metric entropy measurements are done in R by using the np package (Hayfield and Racine (2008))

References

  • Berger, David W. and Chaboud, Alain P. and Chernenko, Sergey V. and Howorka, Edward and Jonathan H. Wright (2008). “Order Flow and Exchange Rate Dynamics in Electronic Brokerage System Data”, Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 75(1), pages 93–109, May.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berkowitz, Jeremy (2001). “Testing Density Forecasts with Applications to Risk Management”, Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 19, 465–474.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheung, Yin-Wong & Chinn, Menzie D. & Antonio G. Pascual (2005).“Empirical Exchange Rate Models of the Nineties: Are any Fit to Survive?” Journal of International Money and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 24(7), pages 1150–1175, November.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chinn, Menzie D. & Michael J. Moore (2011).“Order Flow and the Monetary Model of Exchange Rates: Evidence from a Novel Data Set”, Forthcoming in Journal of Money, Credit and Banking.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, Todd E. & Michael W. McCracken (2001).“Tests of Equal Forecast Accuracy and Encompassing for Nested Models”, Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 105(1), pages 85–110, November.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, Todd E. & Kenneth D. West (2006).“Using out-of-sample Mean Squared Prediction Errors to Test the Martingale Difference Hypothesis”, Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 135(1–2), pages 155–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clements, Michael P. & Jeremy Smith (2000). “Evaluating the Forecast Densities of Linear and Non-Linear Models: Applications to Output Growth and Unemployment”, Journal of Forecasting, 19, 255–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corradi, Valentina & Norman R. Swanson (2006). “Predictive Density Evaluation”, in: Handbook of Economic Forecasting, eds. Clive W.J. Granger, Graham Elliot and Allan Timmerman, Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp. 197–284.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diebold, Francis X & Gunther, Todd A. & Anthony S. Tay (1998).“Evaluating Density Forecasts with Applications to Financial Risk Management”, International Economic Review, vol. 39(4), pages 863–83, November.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diebold, Francis X & Roberto S. Mariano (1995).“Comparing Predictive Accuracy”, Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, American Statistical Association, vol. 13(3), pages 253–63, July.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diebold, Francis X & James A. Nason (1990).“Nonparametric Exchange Rate Prediction?” Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 28(3–4), pages 315–332, May.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engel, Charles & Mark, Nelson C. & Kenneth D. West (2007).“Exchange Rate Models are not as Bad as You Think”, NBER Chapters, in: NBER Macroeconomics Annual 2007, Volume 22, pages 381–441 National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engel, Charles & Kenneth D. West (2005). “Exchange Rates and Fundamentals”, Journal of Political Economy, vol. 113(3), pages 485–517, June.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, M.D.D. & Richard K. Lyons (2002). “Order Flow and Exchange Rate Dynamics”, Journal of Political Economy, vol. 110(1), 170–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans, M.D.D. & Richard K. Lyons (2005). “Meese and Rogoff Redux: Micro-Based Exchange Rate Forecasting”, American Economic Review, vol. 95(2), pages 405–414, May.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faust, Jon & Rogers, John H. & Jonathan H. Wright (2003).“Exchange Rate Forecasting: The Errors We’ve Really Made”, Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 60(1), pages 35–59, May.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giannnerini, Simone & Dagum, Estela B. & Esfandiar Maasoumi (2011).“A Powerful Entropy Test for Linearity Against Nonlinearity in Time Series”, Working Paper Series.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gourinchas, Pierre-Olivier & Helene Rey (2007).“International Financial Adjustment”, Journal of Political Economy, vol. 115(4), pages 665–703.

    Google Scholar 

  • Granger, Clive W. J. & Maasoumi, Esfandiar & Jeff Racine (2004).“A Dependence Metric For Possibly Nonlinear Processes”, Journal of Time Series Analysis, 25, Issue 5, pp. 649–669.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayfield, Tristen & Jeffrey S. Racine (2008). “Nonparametric Econometrics: The np Package”, Journal of Statistical Software, Volume 27 (5).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hsiao, Cheng & Li, Qi & Jeffrey S. Racine (2007).“A Consistent Model Specification Test with Mixed Discrete and Continuous Data”, Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 140(2), pages 802–826, October.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, Qi & Jeffrey S. Racine (2007). Nonparametric Econometrics: Theory and Practice, Princeton University Press, ISBN: 0691121613, 768 Pages.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maasoumi, Esfandiar & Jeff Racine (2002).“Entropy and Predictability of Stock Market Returns”, Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 107(1–2), pages 291–312, March.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mark, Nelson C. (1995).“Exchange Rates and Fundamentals: Evidence on Long-Horizon Predictability”, American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 85(1), pages 201–18, March.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meese, Richard A. & Kenneth Rogoff (1983).“Empirical Exchange Rate Models of the Seventies : Do They Fit out of Sample?” Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 14(1–2), pages 3–24, February.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meese, Richard A & Andrew K. Rose (1991).“An Empirical Assessment of Non-linearities in Models of Exchange Rate Determination”, Review of Economic Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 58(3), pages 603–19, May.

    Google Scholar 

  • Molodtsova, Tanya & David H. Papell (2009).“Out-of-sample Exchange Rate Predictability with Taylor Rule Fundamentals”, Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 77(2), pages 167–180, April.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nikolsko-Rzhevskyy, Alex & Ruxandra Prodan (2011).“Markov Switching and Exchange Rate Predictability”, Forthcoming in International Journal of Forecasting.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogoff, Kenneth S. & Vania Stavrakeva (2008).“The Continuing Puzzle of Short Horizon Exchange Rate Forecasting”, NBER Working Papers 14071, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skaug, H. & Dag Tjøstheim (1996). “Testing for Serial Independence Using Measures of Distance Between Densities”, in P. Robinson & M. Rosenblatt, eds, Athens Conference on Applied Probability and Time Series, Springer Lecture Notes in Statistics, Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Su, Liangjun & Halbert White (2008). “Nonparametric Hellinger Metric Test for Conditional Independence”, Econometric Theory, vol. 24, pages 829–864.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Jian & Jason J. Wu (2010).“The Taylor Rule and Forecast Intervals for Exchange Rates”, Forthcoming in Journal of Money, Credit and Banking.

    Google Scholar 

  • West, Kenneth D. (1996).“Asymptotic Inference about Predictive Ability”, Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 64(5), pages 1067–84, September.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, Halbert (2000). “A Reality Check for Data Snooping”, Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 68(5), pages 1097–1126, September.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Esfandiar Maasoumi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Maasoumi, E., Bulut, L. (2013). Predictability and Specification in Models of Exchange Rate Determination. In: Chen, X., Swanson, N. (eds) Recent Advances and Future Directions in Causality, Prediction, and Specification Analysis. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-1653-1_16

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics