Abstract
The skills of some blind humans orienting in their environment through the auditory analysis of reflections from self-generated sounds have received only little scientific attention to date. Here we present data from a series of formal psychophysical experiments with sighted subjects trained to evaluate features of a virtual echo-acoustic space, allowing for rigid and fine-grain control of the stimulus parameters. The data show how subjects shape both their vocalisations and auditory analysis of the echoes to serve specific echo-acoustic tasks. First, we show that humans can echo-acoustically discriminate target distances with a resolution of less than 1 m for reference distances above 3.4 m. For a reference distance of 1.7 m, corresponding to an echo delay of only 10 ms, distance JNDs were typically around 0.5 m. Second, we explore the interplay between the precedence effect and echolocation. We show that the strong perceptual asymmetry between lead and lag is weakened during echolocation. Finally, we show that through the auditory analysis of self-generated sounds, subjects discriminate room-size changes as small as 10%.
In summary, the current data confirm the practical efficacy of human echolocation, and they provide a rigid psychophysical basis for addressing its neural foundations.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Blauert J, Xiang N (1993) Binaural scale modelling for auralization and prediction of acoustics in auditoria. J Appl Acoust 38:267–290
Denzinger A, Schnitzler HU (1998) Echo SPL, training experience, and experimental procedure influence the ranging performance in the big brown bat, Eptesicus fuscus. J Comp Physiol A 183:213–224
Goerlitz HR, Geberl C, Wiegrebe L (2010) Sonar detection of jittering real targets in a free-flying bat. J Acoust Soc Am 128:1467–1475
Kellogg WN (1962) Sonar system of the blind. Science 137:399–404
Litovsky RY (1997) Developmental changes in the precedence effect: estimates of minimum audible angle. J Acoust Soc Am 102:1739–1745
Litovsky RY et al (1999) The precedence effect. J Acoust Soc Am 106:1633–1654
Palmer SE (1999) Vision Science: Photons to Phenomenology. MIT Press, Cambridge
Rice CE (1967) Human echo perception. Science 155:656–664
Rice CE, Feinstein SH (1965) Sonar system of the blind: size discrimination. Science 148:1107–1108
Schenkman BN, Nilsson ME (2010) Human echolocation: blind and sighted persons’ ability to detect sounds recorded in the presence of a reflecting object. Perception 39:483–501
Simmons JA (1973) The resolution of target range by echolocating bats. J Acoust Soc Am 54: 157–173
Teng S, Puri A, Whitney D (2011) Ultrafine spatial acuity of blind expert human echolocators. Exp Brain Res 216:483–488
Tollin DJ, Henning GB (1998) Some aspects of the lateralization of echoed sound in man. I. The classical interaural-delay based precedence effect. J Acoust Soc Am 104:3030–3038
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the ‘Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft’ (Wi 1518/9 to Lutz Wiegrebe), the ‘Studienstiftung des Deutschen Volkes’ (Stipend to Ludwig Wallmeier), and the Danish Research Foundation.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this paper
Cite this paper
Schörnich, S. et al. (2013). Psychophysics of Human Echolocation. In: Moore, B., Patterson, R., Winter, I., Carlyon, R., Gockel, H. (eds) Basic Aspects of Hearing. Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology, vol 787. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-1590-9_35
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-1590-9_35
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-1589-3
Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-1590-9
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)