Skip to main content

Massidea.org: a greener way to innovate

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Green Technologies in Food Production and Processing

Part of the book series: Food Engineering Series ((FSES))

Abstract

This chapter focuses on the very early phase of the innovation process typically named the fuzzy front end (later FFE) of innovation. We challenge our current understanding of innovation practices at the individual but also at the system level by presenting the novel massinnovation concept. Massinnovation may be defined as: When a wide range of people and their different but complementary insights are brought together, novel ideas generated by thinking outside the box are possible. Massidea.org—smashing ideas founded on a series of innovation theories—is a free-of-charge open innovation community in which people can not only share their ideas, but also discuss today’s challenges as well as visions of the future, which are key factors when creating new innovations. By intelligently connecting people and their brainchildren with the help of content recommendation, a creative space that can boost individual and communal creativity is born. In Massidea.org, public, private, and educational sector organizations and nations can collaborate in a green way with a wide range of people. First this chapter introduces the theoretical foundations of massinnovation, and then, the concept of Massidea.org is discussed in detail.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Balabanović, M., and Y. Shoham. 1997. Fab: Content-based, collaborative recommendation. Communications of the ACM 40(3): 66–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bontis, N. 2004. National intellectual capital index: a United Nations initiative for the Arab region. Journal of Intellectual Capital 5(1): 13–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourke, R., and L. Kempfer. 1999. Achieving success with mass customisation: The vital contribution of engineering. Cleveland: Computer-Aided Engineering.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bower, J. L., and C. M. Christensen. Disruptive technologies: Catching the wave. Harvard Business Review 73(1): 43–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cachia, R., R. Compañó, and O. Da Costa. 2007. Grasping the potential of online social networks for foresight. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 74(8): 1179–1203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chesbrough, H. 2003. Open innovation: The new imperative for creating and profiting from technology. Harvard: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cingil, I., A. Dogac, and A. Azgin. 2000. A broader approach to personalisation. Communications of the ACM 43(8): 136–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, R.G. 1988. Predevelopment activities determine new product success. Industrial Market Management 17(2): 237–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, R.G. 2001. Winning at new products: Accelerating the process from idea to launch. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, R.G., and E.J. Kleinschmidt. 1986. An investigation into the new product process: Steps, deficiencies, and impact on performance. Journal of Product Innovation Management 3: 71–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, S.M. 1987. Future perfect. Reading: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Etzkowitz, H., and L. Leydesdorff. 1999. The future location of research and technology transfer. The Journal of Technological Transfer 24(2–3): 111–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Etzkowitz, H., and L. Leydesdorff. 2000. The dynamics of innovation: From national systems and ‘Mode 2’ to a Triple Helix of university-industry-government relations. Research Policy 29: 109–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flink James, J. 1976. The car culture. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, C. 1987. Technology policy and economic performance: Lessons from Japan. London: Pinter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaston-Breton, C., L. Duque, and N. Lado. 2009. What’s keeping people in virtual communities? A survey study of the determinants of participant’s satisfaction. In Proceedings from the 8th international marketing trends conference, Paris, France.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haho, P. 2002. Strategic and operational process innovations in NPD processes applying evolutionary change management. In Continuous innovation in business processes and networks, 4th International CINet 2002 conference, Espoo, Finland, 15–18 Sep 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howe, J. 2006. The rise of crowdsourcing. Wired 14(16). http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/14.06/crowds.html.

  • Huiban, J.P., and Z. Boushina. 1988. Innovation and the quality of labour factor. Small Business Economics 10: 389–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jetter, A. 2003. Educating the Guess: Strategies, Concepts and Tools for the Fuzzy Front End of Product Development. in PICMET 03 Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering and Technology Technology Management for Reshaping the World 2003, Publisher: Portland State Univ, Pages: 261–273.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaivo-oja, J., and T. Santonen. 2010. Open Innovation in a Systemic Innovation Context: Analyzing Online Mass Innovation Process from Systemic Perspectives. in Proc. of The Open Innovation Research Seminar, Kouvola, Finland, 23 August 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katajisto J., and M. Kimari. 2005. Education, Training and Demand for Labour in Finland by 2015. Finnish Helsinki, National Board of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khurana, A., and S.R. Rosenthal. 1998. Towards holistic “front ends” in new product development. The Journal of Product Innovation Management 15(1): 57–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koen, P., G. Ajamian, R. Burkart, A. Clamen, E. Fisher, S. Fountoulakis, A. Johnson, P. Puri, and R. Seibert. 2001. Providing clarity and a common language to the “fuzzy front end”. Research Technology Management 44(2): 46–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohli, A.K., and B.J. Jaworski. 1990. Market orientation: The construct, research propositions, and managerial implications. The Journal of Marketing 54(2): 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Le Borgne-Bachschmidt, F., S. Girieud, M. Leiba, S. de Munck, S. Limonard, M. Poel, L. Kool, N. Helberger, L. Guibault, E. Janssen, N. Van Eijk, C. Angelopoulos, J. Van Hoboken, and E. Swart. 2009. User generated content: Supporting a participative information, Final Report, Society Study for the European Commission DG Information Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leadbeater, C. 2008. We-think: mass innovation, not mass production: The power of mass creativity. London: Profile Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lundvall, B.Å. 2007. National innovation systems—Analytical concept and development tool. Industry and Innovation 14(1): 95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McQuail, D. 2005. McQuail’s mass communication theory. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mobasher, B., R. Cooley, and J. Srivastava. 2000. Automatic personalisation based on Web usage mining. Communications of the ACM 43(8): 142–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, S.A., and V. Kumer. 1997. The front end of new product development: A Canadian survey. R&D Management 27: 5–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Narver, J., and S. Slater. 1990. The effect of a market orientation on business profitability. The Journal of Marketing 54(4): 20–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, R. (ed.). 1993. National innovation systems: A comparative analysis. New York/Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen, J. 1997. Community is dead; long live mega-collaboration. Jakob Nielsen’s Alertbox for 15 Aug 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen, J. 2006. Participation inequality: Encouraging more users to contribute, Jakob Nielsen’s Alertbox, 9 Oct 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nobelius, D., and L. Trygg. 2002. Stop chasing the front end process: Management of the early phases in product development projects. International Journal of Project Management 20(5): 331–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OECD. 2007. Participative Web: User-created content, DSTI/ICCP/IE(2006)7/FINAL, prepared by Sacha Wunsch-Vincent and Graham Vickery, Directorate for science, technology and industry; Committee for information, computer and communications policy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pepper, D., and M. Rogers. 1993. The one to one future. New York: Currency-Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pine, J. 1993. Mass customisation: The new frontier in business competition. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pine, J., D. Peppers, and M. Rogers. 1995. Do you want to keep your customers forever? Harvard Business Review 73(2): 103–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. E. 1998. The Competitive Advantage of Nations. New York: Free Press (First published 1990).

    Google Scholar 

  • Pöyhönen, A., and A. Smedlund. 2004. Assessing intellectual capital creation in regional clusters. Journal of Intellectual Capital 5(3): 351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, E.M. 1962. Diffusion of innovations. Glencoe: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Santonen, T. 2003. The effect of mass customization on demand turbulence. IADIS International Journal on WWW/Internet 1(2): 64–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Santonen, T. 2007. Defining a mass customization strategy for online banking. International Journal of Mass Customisation 2(1/2): 95–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Santonen, T. 2009. Creating the foundations for mass innovation implementing national open innovation system (NOIS) as a part of higher education. In Proceedings of the 2nd ISPIM innovation symposium—Stimulating recovery—The role of innovation management, eds. K.R.E. Huizingh, S. Conn, M. Torkkeli, and I. Bitran. New York, 6–9 Dec 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • Santonen, T. 2011. Intercultural virtual student teams open innovating via online social networks, in The 4th ISPIM Innovation Symposium - Managing Innovation for Sustained Productivity: Creating Advantage and Resilience - New Zealand on 29 November–2 December 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Santonen, T., and M. Lehtelä. 2010. Higher education student’s motivation to participate in online mass innovation. in The XXI ISPIM Conference - The Dynamics of Innovation - Bilbao, Spain on 6–9 June 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Santonen, T., and K. Karhu. 2010. Massidea.org: Defining a digital business ecosystem (DBE) for massinnovation: in The 3rd ISPIM Innovation Symposium - Managing the Art of Innovation: Turning Concepts into Reality - Quebec City, Canada on 12–15 December 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Santonen, T., and D. Schallmo. 2011. Evaluating Industry Business Model Innovation Stage-Gate Process: Case Massidea.org: in the The XXII ISPIM Conference – Sustainability in Innovation: Innovation Management Challenges - Hamburg, Germany on 12–15 June 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Santonen, T., J. Kaivo-oja, and J. Suomala. 2007. Introduction to National Open Innovation System (NOIS) paradigm: A preliminary concept for interchange. Turku: Finland Futures Research Centre, Turku School of Economics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Santonen, T., J. Kaivo-Oja, J. Suomala. 2008a. Brief Intorduction to National Open Innovation System (NOIS) Paradigm: Integrating Online Social Networks and the Triple Helix Model, In: “Proceedings of the 2nd International Multi-Conference on Society, Cybernetics and Informatics: The 6th International Conference on Politics and Information Systems, Technologies and Applications: PISTA 2008, Volume III”, Edited by Friedrich Welsch, Jose Vicente Carrasquero, Angel Oropeza, Chie Bein Chen, ISBN-10: 1-934272-48-5 (Volume III), Orlando, Florida, USA, June 29th – July 2nd 2008, pp.126–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Santonen, T., J. Suomala, J. Kaivo-Oja. 2008b. Brief Introduction to the National Open Innovation System (NOIS) Paradigm: Supporting individual creativity in an online social network with content recommendation, In: K.R.E. Huizingh, M. Torkkeli, S. Conn and I. Bitran (eds). Proc. of the XIX ISPIM Annual Conference. Open Innovation: Creating Products and Services through Collaboration. Tours, France, 15–18 June 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  • Santonen, T., J. Kaivo-Oja, M. Antikainen. 2011. National Open, Innovation System (NOIS): Defining a Solid Reward Model for NOIS, International Journal of Innovation and Regional Development, International Journal of Innovation and Regional Development (IJIRD), Vol 3., No. 1, 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, J. 1934. The theory of economic development: An inquiry into profits, capital, credit, interest and the business cycle. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, C., R. Hal, Varian. 1998. Information Rules: A Strategic Guide to the Network Economy, Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, P.G., and D.G. Reinertsen. 1991. Developing products in half the time. New York: van Nostrand Reinhold.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ståhle, P., A. Poyhonen, and K. Kylakeiko. 2004. Towards operationalization of dynamic capabilities. In Internet economy: Opportunities and challenges for the developed and developing regions of the world, ed. Y. Hosni. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, G.A., and J. Burley. 1997. 3000 raw ideas equals 1 commercial success! Research Technology Management 40(3): 16–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suomala, J., V. Taatila, R. Siltala, and S. Keskinen. 2006. Chance discovery as a first step to economic innovation. In Proceedings of the twenty-eighth annual conference of the cognitive science society, ed. R. Sun and N. Miyake. Mahwah: LEA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taatila, V., J. Suomala, R. Siltala, and S. Keskinen. 2006. Framework to study the social innovation net-works. European Journal of Innovation Management 9(3): 312–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tapscott, D., and A.D. Williams. 2006. Wikinomics: How mass collaboration changes everything. New York: Portfolio Hardcover.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thagard, P. 1999. How scientists explain disease. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thagard, P., and D. Croft. 1999. Scientific discovery and technological innovation: Ulcers, dinosaur extinction, and the programming language JAVA. In Model-based reasoning in scientific discovery, ed. L. Magnani, N. Nersessian, and P. Thagard. New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toffler, A. 1970. Future shock. New York: Bantam Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tuomi, I. 2002. Networks of innovation. Change and meaning in the age of Internet. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Urabe, K. 1988. Innovation and the Japanese management system. In Innovation and management: International comparisons, ed. K. Urabe, J. Child, and T. Kagono. Berlin: De Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Urban, G., and E. von Hippel. 1988. Lead user analyses for the development of new industrial products. Management Science 34(5): 569–582.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • von Hippel, E. 1986. Lead users: A source of novel product concepts. Management Science 32(7): 791–805.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, L., and S. Ehrenmann. 2010. How diversity management supports the fuzzy front end of innovation. In Proceedings of the XXI ISPIM conference. the dynamics of innovation, eds. K.R.E. Huizingh, S. Conn, M. Torkkeli, and I. Bitran, Bilbao, Spain, 6–9 June 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, Q., and W.J. Doll. 2001. The fuzzy front end and success of new product development: A causal model. European Journal of Innovation Management 4(2): 95–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Teemu Santonen .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

5WA4 format example

5WA4 format example

Massidea.org is a good tool to stimulate collaboration before, during, and after conferences and other events. Massidea.org brings complimentary insights together and boosts creativity by intelligently connecting people and their insights. Especially scientific conferences, which are typically limited to face-to-face interaction and linear content format could expand collaboration possibilities with the help of Massidea.org.

1.1 What is the idea?

Massinnovation occurs when a wide range of people and their different but complimentary insights are brought together and novel ideas generated by thinking outside the box are generated. Massidea.org (www.massidea.org) is an open innovation community for sharing challenges, ideas and visions. It boosts individual and communal creativity by intelligently connecting people and their insights.

Because in Massidea.org people’s posts (i.e., insights) are cumulative of users’ knowledge portfolio, it helps them to build their collaboration network based on their insights while promoting their expertise to others. Interaction before, during, and after the conference is possible when combing these individual persons and their insights as groups such as scientific conferences.

1.2 Why might the idea work?

Scientific and other academic-oriented conferences in particular mainly rely on face-to-face interaction. This limits collaboration because the interaction is restricted to conference members and small groups during the conference days. This traditional process is also founded on linear content production and usage process (i.e., the process does not include interaction). Following linear process most likely results in expected findings. However, the possibility to discover unexpected findings increases when following nonlinear and interactive content reading processes. Unexpected findings have been identified as an important tool to generate novel innovations.

1.3 At whom is the idea aimed?

This idea should interest especially scientific conference organizers (or other written document–based events) and the participants for these events. Because the majority of the required content is already created, there is limited extra work required to exploit this possibility. Massidea.org is free of charge so there is no extra cost to run it.

1.4 Where can the idea be used?

Implementing this idea in practice expands the events from the physical world to the digital online environment. Thus, even a very local event can have a global audience. The automated translation tools in Massidea.org also enable the usage of one’s mother tongue. This lowers the barrier to interact with a global audience.

1.5 When can the idea be used?

Before the event: Using Massidea.org should start well in advance before the actual conference. The main idea is to start collaboration and group building preferably weeks before the event. As a result, when the conference members enter into the conference venue, they will already be familiar with those members who are interested in the same issues. Because the collaboration is based on people’s insights and linkages (even unexpected) between insights, this helps building up the right network.

During the event: Massidea.org will also act as a tool to collect insights during the conference presentations. Typical academic format includes 15–25 min’ presentation time and then a few minutes for a couple of questions. With the help of Massidea.org participants are able to give comments during the presentation. Now not only the session participants, but also other conference members and the rest of the world are able to “hear” what questions the topic raised. Also, if questions are raised before a session, the person giving the presentation can note them during the presentation. This process also enables a kind of simultaneous participation to multiple sessions, which is impossible in the face-to-face–based operating model.

After the event: All the insights, comments, and user profiles can be used as for networking interface after the event. Because Massidea.org collects different topics, including both academic and practical insights, this also links one event to the rest of the world.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Her Majesty the Queen, in Right of Canada

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Santonen, T. (2012). Massidea.org: a greener way to innovate. In: Boye, J., Arcand, Y. (eds) Green Technologies in Food Production and Processing. Food Engineering Series. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-1587-9_20

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics