The Double Effect: In Theory and in Practice
It is not always possible to perform clinical interventions that benefit a patient without also triggering some degree of harm. The double effect (DE) is both a moral and pragmatic principle to determine whether the good outcome resulting from an action outweighs any detrimental secondary effects. The principle’s underpinnings are lodged in medieval, theological thought, and the continuing clinical significance of DE to a diverse, technological society is the subject of much debate among scientists and philosophers. In the scientific literature, DE is most often invoked to address questions of what is moral and ethical in end-of-life care.
KeywordsPalliative Care Respiratory Depression Patient Autonomy Double Effect Hippocratic Oath
Beth Dove of Dove Medical Communications, Salt Lake City, Utah, contributed technical writing and manuscript review. (Note: Please note the spelling of Dove – not Dover – Medical Communications).
- 1.Mangan J. An historical analysis of the principle of double effect. Theol Stud. 1949;10:41–61.Google Scholar
- 2.Aquinas T. (13th c). Summa Theologica II-II, Q. 64, art. 7, “Of Killing”. In: Baumgarth WP, Richard J, Regan SJ, editors. On law, morality, and politics. Indianapolis/Cambridge: Hackett Publishing Co; 1988. p. 226–7.Google Scholar
- 6.Tauber AI. Patient autonomy and the ethics of responsibility. Cambridge: MIT Press; 2005.Google Scholar
- 9.McGee A. Double effect in the criminal code 1899 (QLD): a critical appraisal. QUT Law Just J. 2004;4(1):46–57.Google Scholar
- 13.Vacco v. Quill, 117 S.Ct. 2293. 1997.Google Scholar
- 14.Washington v. Glucksberg, 117 S.Ct. 2258. 1997.Google Scholar
- 17.Reality check on the pain relief promotion act. Secretariat for Pro-Life Activities, United States Conference of Catholic Bishops, 3211 4th Street, N.E., Washington, DC 20017–1194 (202) 541–3070. http://www.nccbuscc.org/prolife/issues/euthanas/reality2.htm. Accessed 17 Aug 2006.
- 20.The use of opioids for the treatment of chronic pain: a consensus statement from American Academy of Pain Medicine and American Pain Society. Approved by the AAPM Board of Directors on 29 June 1996. Approved by the APS Executive Committee on 20 Aug 1996. http://www.ampainsoc.org/advocacy/opioids.htm. Accessed 19 July 2005. Under review.
- 23.Webster LR, Grant BJB, Choi Y. Sleep apnea associated with methadone and benzodiazepine therapy [abstract]. Poster presented at the 22nd annual meeting of the American Academy of Pain Medicine (AAPM), San Diego, 2006.Google Scholar
- 28.McIntyre A. Doctrine of double effect. In: Edward NZ, editors. The stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. Summer 2006 ed. 2006. http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2006/entries/double-effect/. Accessed August 20, 2012.
- 30.Cahana A. Is optimal pain relief always optimal? Bioethical considerations of interventional pain management at the end of life. Am Pain Soc Bull. 2002;12(3):1–4.Google Scholar