Case Study: International Financial Architecture and Standards

  • Elias G. Carayannis
  • Ali Pirzadeh
  • Denisa Popescu
Part of the Innovation, Technology, and Knowledge Management book series (ITKM, volume 13)


Considering what has occurred at the global level for the past 20 years, it must be apparent that the time has come for many economies to acknowledge the globalization paradigm and consider economic policies that are suited for the twenty first century global market. Today, virtually all countries are functionally integrated into the prevailing global system and within global framework.


Corporate Governance Knowledge Transfer Absorptive Capacity Global Governance Epistemic Community 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Cohen, W.M., & Levinthal, D.A. (1990). Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly. 35(1), 128–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Darr E, Kurtzberg T (2000) An investigation of partner similarity dimensions on knowledge transfer. Organizational Behavior andGoogle Scholar
  3. Davenport, T.H., & Prusak, L. (1998). Working Knowledge. Boston: Harvard Business.Google Scholar
  4. Eatwell, J. (2002). The New International Financial Architecture: Promise or Threat?. Cambridge Endowment for Research in Finance (CERF).Google Scholar
  5. Eichengreen BJ (1999) Toward a New International Financial Architecture: A Practical Post-Asia Agenda. Washington, D. C.: Institute for International Economics.Google Scholar
  6. Financial Stability Forum (FSF). (2000). Report of the follow-up group on incentives to foster implementation of standards, Meeting of the Financial Stability Forum 7/8 September 2000.Google Scholar
  7. Haycox, A., Bagust,A.,Walley.T.(1999, February). Clinical Guidelines the Hidden Costs. (318,391–393).B.M.J Kenen, P.B.(2001). The International Financial Architecture: What’s New? What’s Missing?. Washington, D. C., Institute for International Economics.Google Scholar
  8. Hegarty, J., Gielen, F. & Barros, A.C.H (2004). Implementation of International Accounting and Auditing Standards: Lessons Learned from the World Bank’s Accounting and Auditing ROSC Program. September 2004. World Bank Group.Google Scholar
  9. Hox, J.J. (2005). Multilevel Analysis, Techniques and Applications. Mahwah: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  10. Leebron,D.W. (1996). Lying Down with Procrustes: An Analysis of Harmonization Claims. In J. Bhagwati, & R.E. Hudec (Eds.),Fair Trade and Harmonization: Prerequisites for Free Trade(41–118).Google Scholar
  11. OECD (2003) The OECD report on regulatory reform, Volume 1, OECD, Paris.Google Scholar
  12. Penaranda F E (1996) Meet your partners and your enemies: the Federal sector. Proc. of the Technology Transfer Metrics Summit, Santa Fe, NMGoogle Scholar
  13. Popescu D (2010) Effective Transfer of International Regulatory Standards. LAP LAMBERT Academic PublishingGoogle Scholar
  14. Rosen, A. and Proctor, E.K. (2003). Developing Practice Guidelines for Social Work Intervention. Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Roubini, N., & Uzan, M. (2005). New International Financial Architecture. Elgar Publishing Press.Google Scholar
  16. Schneider B (2002) The Road to Financial Stability: Are Key financial Standards the Answer? Paper presented at conference on International Standards and Codes: The Developing Country Perspective, 21 June 2002, Overseas Development InstituteGoogle Scholar
  17. Shannon, C. E., & Weaver, W. (1949). The Mathematical Theory of Communication. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
  18. Soederberg, S. (2005). The New International Financial Architecture. In A. Baker, & T. Sowell (1974). Classical Economics Reconsidered. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Szulanski, G and Jensen, R. (2004). Stickiness and the adaptation of organizational practices in cross-border knowledge transfers. Journal of International Business Studies, 35 (6), 508–523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Szulanski, G. (1996). Exploring internal stickiness: impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17 (Winter Special Issue), 27–43.Google Scholar
  21. Szulanski, G. (2000). The process of knowledge transfer: a diachronic analysis of stickiness. Organizational Behaviour and Human Decision Processes, 82 (1), 9–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Thakur,R., & Weiss,T.G. (2005). The UN and Global Governance: An Idea and its Prospects, at
  23. Zander U, Kogut B (1995) Knowledge and the speed of transfer and imitation of organizational capabilities. Organization Science 6:76–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Elias G. Carayannis
    • 1
  • Ali Pirzadeh
    • 2
  • Denisa Popescu
    • 3
  1. 1.School of BusinessGeorge Washington UniversityWashingtonUSA
  2. 2.Independent ConsultantWashingtonUSA
  3. 3.World Bank GroupWashingtonUSA

Personalised recommendations